Developing decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase chemoprevention informed choice and uptake: A retrospective translational science case study

IF 2.1 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.565
Leah G. Pope, Zainab Abedin, Katherine D. Crew, Rita Kukafka, Harold Alan Pincus
{"title":"Developing decision support tools for high-risk women and healthcare providers to increase chemoprevention informed choice and uptake: A retrospective translational science case study","authors":"Leah G. Pope, Zainab Abedin, Katherine D. Crew, Rita Kukafka, Harold Alan Pincus","doi":"10.1017/cts.2024.565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective case studies are one approach to help identify processes underlying the translation of successful health interventions. This case study investigates the development of <jats:italic>RealRisks</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Breast Cancer Risk Navigation</jats:italic> (<jats:italic>BNAV</jats:italic>), decision support tools for breast cancer risk assessment, and risk-stratified prevention. Following a recently developed protocol for retrospective translational science case studies, we examined the career trajectory of Dr Katherine Crew as she expanded from basic science to interdisciplinary, patient-oriented research in oncology and began collaboration with Dr Rita Kukafka, a public health informatician focused on communicating risk. Data collection methods included key informant interviews and examination of peer-reviewed publications, funded grants, and news articles associated with the research. Data were analyzed to identify key milestones in the development of <jats:italic>RealRisks</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>BNAV</jats:italic> and to elucidate facilitators and barriers to the translational process. Facilitators to translation included funding and infrastructure provided by a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), the creation of an interdisciplinary team, and broad support from stakeholders including patient advocacy groups. Barriers to translation included limited mid-career support, ongoing costs for technology, and the time required to establish interdisciplinary, team science efforts. The findings reported here can be used to inform ongoing efforts to develop a more robust science of translation.","PeriodicalId":15529,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2024.565","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Retrospective case studies are one approach to help identify processes underlying the translation of successful health interventions. This case study investigates the development of RealRisks and Breast Cancer Risk Navigation (BNAV), decision support tools for breast cancer risk assessment, and risk-stratified prevention. Following a recently developed protocol for retrospective translational science case studies, we examined the career trajectory of Dr Katherine Crew as she expanded from basic science to interdisciplinary, patient-oriented research in oncology and began collaboration with Dr Rita Kukafka, a public health informatician focused on communicating risk. Data collection methods included key informant interviews and examination of peer-reviewed publications, funded grants, and news articles associated with the research. Data were analyzed to identify key milestones in the development of RealRisks and BNAV and to elucidate facilitators and barriers to the translational process. Facilitators to translation included funding and infrastructure provided by a Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA), the creation of an interdisciplinary team, and broad support from stakeholders including patient advocacy groups. Barriers to translation included limited mid-career support, ongoing costs for technology, and the time required to establish interdisciplinary, team science efforts. The findings reported here can be used to inform ongoing efforts to develop a more robust science of translation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为高危妇女和医疗服务提供者开发决策支持工具,以增加化学预防的知情选择和吸收:回顾性转化科学案例研究
回顾性案例研究是帮助确定成功的健康干预措施转化过程的一种方法。本案例研究调查了RealRisks和乳腺癌风险导航(BNAV)的开发过程,这是用于乳腺癌风险评估和风险分层预防的决策支持工具。按照最近制定的转化科学案例回顾性研究协议,我们考察了凯瑟琳-克鲁博士的职业轨迹,她从基础科学扩展到肿瘤学领域以患者为导向的跨学科研究,并开始与专注于风险交流的公共卫生信息学家丽塔-库卡夫卡(Rita Kukafka)博士合作。数据收集方法包括关键信息提供者访谈,以及对同行评议出版物、资助基金和与研究相关的新闻报道的审查。通过对数据进行分析,确定了 RealRisks 和 BNAV 开发过程中的关键里程碑,并阐明了转化过程中的促进因素和障碍。促进转化的因素包括临床和转化科学奖(CTSA)提供的资金和基础设施、跨学科团队的建立以及包括患者权益团体在内的利益相关者的广泛支持。转化的障碍包括有限的中期支持、技术的持续成本以及建立跨学科团队科学工作所需的时间。本文报告的研究结果可用于为正在进行的开发更强大的转化科学的工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
26.90%
发文量
437
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Overview of ACTIV trial-specific lessons learned. Preparing better: Accelerating COVID-19 Therapeutic Interventions and Vaccines (ACTIV) therapeutics trials lessons learned: A call to the future. The future is now: Using the lessons learned from the ACTIV COVID-19 therapeutics trials to create an inclusive and efficient clinical trials enterprise. ACTIV trials: Lessons learned in trial design in the setting of an emergent pandemic. Realizing the potential of social determinants data in EHR systems: A scoping review of approaches for screening, linkage, extraction, analysis, and interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1