Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s13246-024-01478-x
Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites
{"title":"Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry","authors":"Tarafder Shameem, Nick Bennie, Martin Butson, David Thwaites","doi":"10.1007/s13246-024-01478-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Radiochromic film, evaluated with flatbed scanners, is used for practical radiotherapy QA dosimetry. Film and scanner component effects contribute to the Lateral Response Artefact (LRA), which is further enhanced by light polarisation from both. This study investigates the scanner bed’s contribution to LRA and also polarisation from the mirrors for widely used EPSON scanners, as part of broader investigations of this dosimetry method aiming to improve processes and uncertainties. Alternative scanner bed materials were compared on a modified EPSON V700 scanner. Polarisation effects were investigated for complete scanners (V700, V800, on- and off-axis, and V850 on-axis), for a removed V700 mirror system, and independently using retail-quality single mirror combinations simulating practical scanner arrangements, but with varying numbers (0–5) and angles. Some tests had no film present, whilst others included films (EBT3) irradiated to 6 MV doses of 0–11.3 Gy. For polarisation analysis, images were captured by a Canon 7D camera with 50 mm focal length lens. Different scanner bed materials showed only small effects, within a few percent, indicating that the normal glass bed is a good choice. Polarisation varied with scanner type (7–11%), increasing at 10 cm lateral off-axis distance by around a further 6%, and also with film dose. The V700 mirror system showed around 2% difference to the complete scanner. Polarization increased with number of mirrors in the single mirror combinations, to 14% for 4 and 5 mirrors, but specific values depend on angles and mirror quality. Novel film measurement methods could reduce LRA effect corrections and associated uncertainties.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-024-01478-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiochromic film, evaluated with flatbed scanners, is used for practical radiotherapy QA dosimetry. Film and scanner component effects contribute to the Lateral Response Artefact (LRA), which is further enhanced by light polarisation from both. This study investigates the scanner bed’s contribution to LRA and also polarisation from the mirrors for widely used EPSON scanners, as part of broader investigations of this dosimetry method aiming to improve processes and uncertainties. Alternative scanner bed materials were compared on a modified EPSON V700 scanner. Polarisation effects were investigated for complete scanners (V700, V800, on- and off-axis, and V850 on-axis), for a removed V700 mirror system, and independently using retail-quality single mirror combinations simulating practical scanner arrangements, but with varying numbers (0–5) and angles. Some tests had no film present, whilst others included films (EBT3) irradiated to 6 MV doses of 0–11.3 Gy. For polarisation analysis, images were captured by a Canon 7D camera with 50 mm focal length lens. Different scanner bed materials showed only small effects, within a few percent, indicating that the normal glass bed is a good choice. Polarisation varied with scanner type (7–11%), increasing at 10 cm lateral off-axis distance by around a further 6%, and also with film dose. The V700 mirror system showed around 2% difference to the complete scanner. Polarization increased with number of mirrors in the single mirror combinations, to 14% for 4 and 5 mirrors, but specific values depend on angles and mirror quality. Novel film measurement methods could reduce LRA effect corrections and associated uncertainties.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平板扫描仪的镜面系统和扫描床对放射性变色胶片剂量测定中横向响应伪影的影响
使用平板扫描仪评估的放射性变色胶片可用于实际的放射治疗剂量质量保证。胶片和扫描仪组件效应会产生侧向响应伪影(LRA),而这两种效应产生的偏振光又会进一步增强侧向响应伪影。本研究调查了扫描床对 LRA 的影响,以及广泛使用的 EPSON 扫描仪反射镜产生的偏振,这是对该剂量测定方法进行更广泛调查的一部分,旨在改进流程和不确定性。在改进型 EPSON V700 扫描仪上比较了其他扫描仪床材料。对整台扫描仪(V700、V800、轴向和非轴向扫描仪,以及 V850 轴向扫描仪)、拆除的 V700 镜系统,以及单独使用零售质量的单镜组合模拟实际扫描仪排列,但数量(0-5)和角度各不相同的偏振效果进行了研究。有些测试中没有胶片,而其他测试中则包括照射剂量为 0-11.3 Gy 的 6 MV 胶片 (EBT3)。为了进行偏振分析,图像由配备 50 毫米焦距镜头的佳能 7D 相机拍摄。不同的扫描床材料对偏振的影响很小,仅在百分之几的范围内,这表明普通玻璃床是个不错的选择。偏振随扫描仪类型的不同而变化(7-11%),在 10 厘米横向离轴距离处又增加了约 6%,同时也随胶片剂量的不同而变化。V700 镜系统与整台扫描仪的偏振率相差约 2%。偏振随着单镜组合中镜子数量的增加而增加,4 个和 5 个镜子的偏振增加到 14%,但具体数值取决于角度和镜子质量。新颖的薄膜测量方法可以减少 LRA 效应修正和相关的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
期刊最新文献
PET/CT-based 3D multi-class semantic segmentation of ovarian cancer and the stability of the extracted radiomics features. PPG2RespNet: a deep learning model for respirational signal synthesis and monitoring from photoplethysmography (PPG) signal Ecg signal watermarking using QR decomposition Effect of mirror system and scanner bed of a flatbed scanner on lateral response artefact in radiochromic film dosimetry A deep learning phase-based solution in 2D echocardiography motion estimation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1