Development of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the 1‐Year Risk of Reoperation After Lower Limb Oncological Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Based on Data From the PARITY Trial

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/jso.27854
Jiawen Deng, Myron Moskalyk, Matthew Shammas‐Toma, Ahmed Aoude, Michelle Ghert, Sahir Bhatnagar, Anthony Bozzo
{"title":"Development of Machine Learning Models for Predicting the 1‐Year Risk of Reoperation After Lower Limb Oncological Resection and Endoprosthetic Reconstruction Based on Data From the PARITY Trial","authors":"Jiawen Deng, Myron Moskalyk, Matthew Shammas‐Toma, Ahmed Aoude, Michelle Ghert, Sahir Bhatnagar, Anthony Bozzo","doi":"10.1002/jso.27854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOncological resection and reconstruction involving the lower extremities commonly lead to reoperations that impact patient outcomes and healthcare resources. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict this reoperation risk.MethodsThis study was conducted according to TRIPOD + AI. Data from the PARITY trial was used to develop ML models to predict the 1‐year reoperation risk following lower extremity oncological resection and reconstruction. Six ML algorithms were tuned and calibrated based on fivefold cross‐validation. The best‐performing model was identified using classification and calibration metrics.ResultsThe polynomial support vector machine (SVM) model was chosen as the best‐performing model. During internal validation, the SVM exhibited an AUC‐ROC of 0.73 and a Brier score of 0.17. Using an optimal threshold that balances all quadrants of the confusion matrix, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.81. Using a high‐sensitivity threshold, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.68. Total operative time was the most important feature for reoperation risk prediction.ConclusionThe models may facilitate reoperation risk stratification, allowing for better patient counseling and for physicians to implement measures that reduce surgical risks.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27854","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOncological resection and reconstruction involving the lower extremities commonly lead to reoperations that impact patient outcomes and healthcare resources. This study aimed to develop a machine learning (ML) model to predict this reoperation risk.MethodsThis study was conducted according to TRIPOD + AI. Data from the PARITY trial was used to develop ML models to predict the 1‐year reoperation risk following lower extremity oncological resection and reconstruction. Six ML algorithms were tuned and calibrated based on fivefold cross‐validation. The best‐performing model was identified using classification and calibration metrics.ResultsThe polynomial support vector machine (SVM) model was chosen as the best‐performing model. During internal validation, the SVM exhibited an AUC‐ROC of 0.73 and a Brier score of 0.17. Using an optimal threshold that balances all quadrants of the confusion matrix, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.45 and a specificity of 0.81. Using a high‐sensitivity threshold, the SVM exhibited a sensitivity of 0.68 and a specificity of 0.68. Total operative time was the most important feature for reoperation risk prediction.ConclusionThe models may facilitate reoperation risk stratification, allowing for better patient counseling and for physicians to implement measures that reduce surgical risks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 PARITY 试验数据开发机器学习模型,用于预测下肢肿瘤切除术和内假体重建术后 1 年的再手术风险
背景涉及下肢的肿瘤切除和重建通常会导致再次手术,从而影响患者的预后和医疗资源。本研究旨在开发一种机器学习(ML)模型来预测这种再手术风险。本研究按照 TRIPOD + AI 的方法进行,利用 PARITY 试验的数据开发 ML 模型,预测下肢肿瘤切除和重建术后 1 年的再手术风险。在五倍交叉验证的基础上,对六种 ML 算法进行了调整和校准。结果多项式支持向量机(SVM)模型被选为表现最佳的模型。在内部验证过程中,SVM 的 AUC-ROC 为 0.73,Brier 得分为 0.17。使用平衡混淆矩阵所有象限的最佳阈值,SVM 的灵敏度为 0.45,特异度为 0.81。使用高灵敏度阈值时,SVM 的灵敏度为 0.68,特异度为 0.68。总手术时间是预测再次手术风险的最重要特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Intraoperative Anesthesiology Provider Handovers on Postoperative Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery. Comment On: "Factors Influencing Prophylactic Surgical Intervention in Women With Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer". Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1