Systematic Review of Robotic‐Assisted Peripheral and Central Lymphatic Surgery

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Journal of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/jso.27866
Imholz Carlotta, Grünherz Lisanne, Lindenblatt Nicole
{"title":"Systematic Review of Robotic‐Assisted Peripheral and Central Lymphatic Surgery","authors":"Imholz Carlotta, Grünherz Lisanne, Lindenblatt Nicole","doi":"10.1002/jso.27866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundRobotic‐assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.MethodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.ResultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full‐text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient‐related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic‐assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient‐related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery.","PeriodicalId":17111,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27866","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundRobotic‐assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.MethodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.ResultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full‐text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient‐related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic‐assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.ConclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient‐related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic‐assisted lymphatic surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助外周和中央淋巴手术的系统回顾
背景在过去几年中,机器人辅助淋巴重建术受到越来越多的关注。目的本研究旨在根据目前已发表的文献,系统地研究机器人辅助淋巴手术的益处。方法根据PRISMA指南,对外周或中央淋巴系统受损患者的可行性、手术方面以及客观和主观改善进行了系统综述评估。结果文献检索在去除重复文章后共获得 328 篇文章,随后对 29 篇文章进行了全文审阅,其中共有 11 篇相关文章被认为符合条件。其中,7 篇采用回顾性设计,4 篇采用前瞻性设计。所有纳入的研究都证实了机器人辅助淋巴手术的可行性,并报告了在技术方面和患者相关结果方面的良好结果。然而,目前只有少数研究将机器人辅助方法与人工方法进行了直接比较,而且这些研究的统计分析结果有限。要进一步确定机器人辅助淋巴手术的未来发展方向,还需要进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
367
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Oncology offers peer-reviewed, original papers in the field of surgical oncology and broadly related surgical sciences, including reports on experimental and laboratory studies. As an international journal, the editors encourage participation from leading surgeons around the world. The JSO is the representative journal for the World Federation of Surgical Oncology Societies. Publishing 16 issues in 2 volumes each year, the journal accepts Research Articles, in-depth Reviews of timely interest, Letters to the Editor, and invited Editorials. Guest Editors from the JSO Editorial Board oversee multiple special Seminars issues each year. These Seminars include multifaceted Reviews on a particular topic or current issue in surgical oncology, which are invited from experts in the field.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The Impact of Intraoperative Anesthesiology Provider Handovers on Postoperative Complications After Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) Surgery. Comment On: "Factors Influencing Prophylactic Surgical Intervention in Women With Genetic Predisposition for Breast Cancer". Impact of Preoperative Counseling and Education on Decreasing Anxiety in Patients With Gynecologic Tumors: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Care Patterns and Outcomes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma by Rurality of Patient Residence in a Midwestern State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1