Comparative Analysis of Countries in Terms of Sustainable and Green Transportation Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1007/s12205-024-1697-9
Nuriye Kabakus, Merve Eyuboglu
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Countries in Terms of Sustainable and Green Transportation Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach","authors":"Nuriye Kabakus, Merve Eyuboglu","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-1697-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The escalating concern regarding irreversible environmental damage has stimulated a global interest in sustainable transportation systems. Green transportation, as a sub-branch of sustainable transportation, aims to enhance economic empowerment of governing bodies, promote active utilization of natural resources, minimize emissions, safeguard the environment, and foster cleaner surroundings. This paper presents a methodology for assessing and comparing countries in terms of sustainable and green transportation using the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM). The dataset employed for the analysis comprises three primary criteria: environment, transportation, and economy, further divided into eight sub-criteria, encompassing population, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, number of motor vehicles, number of electric vehicles, bicycle usage, share of renewable energy sources, and gross domestic product. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to weigh these criteria, followed by ranking countries through the Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of the Ratio Analysis (MOORA) method. The findings reveal that Holland secures the top rank, while Türkiye ranks last concerning sustainable and green transportation. Based on the comparative results, it is recommended that countries positioned lower in the list can improve their standing by prioritizing various parameters such as bicycle transportation, pedestrian-friendly measures, eco-friendly vehicles, public transportation, energy conservation, and economic strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":17897,"journal":{"name":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-1697-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The escalating concern regarding irreversible environmental damage has stimulated a global interest in sustainable transportation systems. Green transportation, as a sub-branch of sustainable transportation, aims to enhance economic empowerment of governing bodies, promote active utilization of natural resources, minimize emissions, safeguard the environment, and foster cleaner surroundings. This paper presents a methodology for assessing and comparing countries in terms of sustainable and green transportation using the multi-criteria decision-making method (MCDM). The dataset employed for the analysis comprises three primary criteria: environment, transportation, and economy, further divided into eight sub-criteria, encompassing population, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, number of motor vehicles, number of electric vehicles, bicycle usage, share of renewable energy sources, and gross domestic product. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) is employed to weigh these criteria, followed by ranking countries through the Multi-Objective Optimization on the basis of the Ratio Analysis (MOORA) method. The findings reveal that Holland secures the top rank, while Türkiye ranks last concerning sustainable and green transportation. Based on the comparative results, it is recommended that countries positioned lower in the list can improve their standing by prioritizing various parameters such as bicycle transportation, pedestrian-friendly measures, eco-friendly vehicles, public transportation, energy conservation, and economic strength.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用多标准决策方法对各国可持续和绿色交通进行比较分析
对不可逆转的环境破坏的担忧不断升级,激发了全球对可持续交通系统的兴趣。绿色交通作为可持续交通的一个分支,旨在增强管理机构的经济能力,促进自然资源的积极利用,最大限度地减少排放,保护环境,营造更清洁的环境。本文介绍了一种采用多重标准决策法(MCDM)对各国可持续绿色交通进行评估和比较的方法。用于分析的数据集包括三个主要标准:环境、交通和经济,并进一步分为八个子标准,包括人口、空气质量、温室气体排放、机动车数量、电动汽车数量、自行车使用率、可再生能源比例和国内生产总值。采用层次分析法(AHP)对这些标准进行权衡,然后通过基于比率分析的多目标优化法(MOORA)对各国进行排名。研究结果表明,在可持续绿色交通方面,荷兰排名第一,而土耳其排名最后。根据比较结果,建议排名靠后的国家可以通过优先考虑自行车交通、行人友好措施、环保车辆、公共交通、节能和经济实力等各种参数来提高其排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering is a technical bimonthly journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. The journal reports original study results (both academic and practical) on past practices and present information in all civil engineering fields. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering, which includes, but are not limited to, the following: coastal and harbor engineering, construction management, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, highway engineering, hydraulic engineering, information technology, nuclear power engineering, railroad engineering, structural engineering, surveying and geo-spatial engineering, transportation engineering, tunnel engineering, and water resources and hydrologic engineering
期刊最新文献
A Novel Rockburst Tendency Index Based on LURR BIM and TLS Point Cloud Integration for Information Management of Underground Coal Mines: A Case Study in Nui Beo Underground Coal Mining in Vietnam Experimental Study on Anisotropic Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of Red-Bed Mudstone Analysis of the Active Earth Pressure of Sandy Soil under the Translational Failure Mode of Rigid Retaining Walls Near Slopes A Hybrid Numerical-ML Model for Predicting Geological Risks in Tunneling with Electrical Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1