Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) predation on unionid mussels in the Salmon and Little Salmon rivers in northern New York

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES River Research and Applications Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1002/rra.4368
John E. Cooper
{"title":"Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) predation on unionid mussels in the Salmon and Little Salmon rivers in northern New York","authors":"John E. Cooper","doi":"10.1002/rra.4368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Muskrat (<jats:italic>Ondatra zibethicus</jats:italic>) predation on unionid mussels has been documented since the late 1800s. More recent studies have examined size‐specific predation and potential effects of predation on mussel populations. This study was part of a larger endeavor that examined the effects of dam removal in the Salmon and Little Salmon rivers in northern New York. Muskrat middens were searched for from 2005 through 2012 and all mussel shells were identified, measured, and evaluated for evidence of muskrat predation. Ten species of consumed mussels were collected from 37 middens. Three species of living mussels that were in low abundance were not found in middens. Distribution of middens was uneven in both rivers and few middens were used in more than 1 year. Muskrats did not consume mussels &lt;37 mm shell length in the Salmon River (SR) and &lt;28 mm in the Little Salmon River (LSR). Shell length distribution of living mussels was similar to that of mussels in middens. Shell length of living SR mussels (based on mean ranks) were significantly longer than living mussels in the LSR as were consumed mussels. Size‐selection may be indicated for <jats:italic>Elliptio complanata</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>Lampsilis radiata</jats:italic> but relative abundance might also be a factor. Dry empty shell weight and thickness were not significantly correlated to percent predation marks. The muskrat population in these rivers could be small as few middens were used in more than 1 year and there was no evidence of muskrat trapping. If so, muskrat predation would have a limited effect on the unionid population.","PeriodicalId":21513,"journal":{"name":"River Research and Applications","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"River Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.4368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) predation on unionid mussels has been documented since the late 1800s. More recent studies have examined size‐specific predation and potential effects of predation on mussel populations. This study was part of a larger endeavor that examined the effects of dam removal in the Salmon and Little Salmon rivers in northern New York. Muskrat middens were searched for from 2005 through 2012 and all mussel shells were identified, measured, and evaluated for evidence of muskrat predation. Ten species of consumed mussels were collected from 37 middens. Three species of living mussels that were in low abundance were not found in middens. Distribution of middens was uneven in both rivers and few middens were used in more than 1 year. Muskrats did not consume mussels <37 mm shell length in the Salmon River (SR) and <28 mm in the Little Salmon River (LSR). Shell length distribution of living mussels was similar to that of mussels in middens. Shell length of living SR mussels (based on mean ranks) were significantly longer than living mussels in the LSR as were consumed mussels. Size‐selection may be indicated for Elliptio complanata and Lampsilis radiata but relative abundance might also be a factor. Dry empty shell weight and thickness were not significantly correlated to percent predation marks. The muskrat population in these rivers could be small as few middens were used in more than 1 year and there was no evidence of muskrat trapping. If so, muskrat predation would have a limited effect on the unionid population.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
麝鼠(Ondatra zibethicus)捕食纽约州北部鲑鱼河和小鲑鱼河中的联盟贻贝
麝鼠(Ondatra zibethicus)对贻贝的捕食早在 19 世纪末就有记载。最近的研究考察了捕食贻贝的大小特征以及捕食对贻贝种群的潜在影响。这项研究是纽约州北部鲑鱼河和小鲑鱼河大坝拆除影响研究的一部分。从 2005 年到 2012 年,我们一直在寻找麝鼠的栖息地,并对所有贻贝壳进行鉴定、测量和评估,以寻找麝鼠捕食的证据。从 37 个贻贝坑中收集了 10 种被捕食的贻贝。在贻贝坑中没有发现三种数量较少的生活贻贝。两条河流中的贻贝窝分布不均,很少有贻贝窝被使用超过一年。在鲑鱼河(SR)和小鲑鱼河(LSR),麝鼠没有吃掉贝壳长度分别为 37 毫米和 28 毫米的贻贝。生活贻贝的贝壳长度分布与贻贝堆中的贝壳长度分布相似。活体SR贻贝的贝壳长度(基于平均等级)明显长于活体LSR贻贝,消耗掉的贻贝也是如此。对于Elliptio complanata和Lampsilis radiata来说,尺寸选择可能是一个因素,但相对丰度也可能是一个因素。空壳干重和厚度与捕食痕迹的百分比没有明显的相关性。这些河流中的麝鼠数量可能很少,因为很少有人在一年以上的时间里使用过麝鼠标本,而且也没有证据表明曾经诱捕过麝鼠。如果是这样的话,麝鼠捕食对乌贼数量的影响将是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
River Research and Applications
River Research and Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: River Research and Applications , previously published as Regulated Rivers: Research and Management (1987-2001), is an international journal dedicated to the promotion of basic and applied scientific research on rivers. The journal publishes original scientific and technical papers on biological, ecological, geomorphological, hydrological, engineering and geographical aspects related to rivers in both the developed and developing world. Papers showing how basic studies and new science can be of use in applied problems associated with river management, regulation and restoration are encouraged as is interdisciplinary research concerned directly or indirectly with river management problems.
期刊最新文献
Scenario Planning Management Actions to Restore Cold Water Stream Habitat: Comparing Mechanistic and Statistical Modeling Approaches Environmental Factors Associated With Fish Reproduction in Regulated Rivers Stream Restoration Effects on Habitat and Abundance of Native Cutthroat Trout Simulation‐Based Assessment of Fine Sediment Transport to Support River Restoration Measures Going to the archives: Combining palaeoecological and contemporary data to support river restoration appraisals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1