{"title":"A SIMPLE FRAILTY INDEX PREDICTS IN-HOSPITAL MORTALITY.","authors":"Zvi Shimoni,Natan Dusseldorp,Yael Cohen,Izack Barnisan,Paul Froom","doi":"10.1159/000541397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nComparing frailty models in different settings that predict in-hospital mortality might modify patient disposition and treatment, but models are often complex.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nIn the following study we selected all acutely admitted adult patients in 2020- 2021 to the three internal medicine departments at a regional 400-bed hospital. We attempt to determine (a) if a new scale (Laniado-4 scale) that includes only three yes/no questions derived from the Norton scale and the presence of a urinary catheter performs as well as the graded Norton scale (including all five domains), in predicting in-hospital mortality and (b) to determine the predictive value of a simple frailty index that includes the new scale as well as categories of age, serum albumin, and creatinine values. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and c-statistics for the various models predicting in-hospital mortality.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe mean patient age was 73±19 years, and 49.1% (5665/11542) were males. A Laniado-4 scale performed better than the Norton scale for predicting in-hospital mortality. A simple frailty index ranging from 0 to ≥8 points was associated with rates of in-hospital mortality that increased from 0 to 37.7%, with an odds ratio of 2.13(2.03-2.25) per 1 index point. The c-statistic was 0.887 (0.881-0.893).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nWe conclude the Laniado-4 scale performed better than the Norton scale in predicting in-hospital mortality and that a simple frailty index that included the 4-question scale and categories of age, serum creatinine, and serum albumin performed as well or better than more complicated models.","PeriodicalId":12662,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology","volume":"2021 1","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541397","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Comparing frailty models in different settings that predict in-hospital mortality might modify patient disposition and treatment, but models are often complex.
METHODS
In the following study we selected all acutely admitted adult patients in 2020- 2021 to the three internal medicine departments at a regional 400-bed hospital. We attempt to determine (a) if a new scale (Laniado-4 scale) that includes only three yes/no questions derived from the Norton scale and the presence of a urinary catheter performs as well as the graded Norton scale (including all five domains), in predicting in-hospital mortality and (b) to determine the predictive value of a simple frailty index that includes the new scale as well as categories of age, serum albumin, and creatinine values. We calculated odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and c-statistics for the various models predicting in-hospital mortality.
RESULTS
The mean patient age was 73±19 years, and 49.1% (5665/11542) were males. A Laniado-4 scale performed better than the Norton scale for predicting in-hospital mortality. A simple frailty index ranging from 0 to ≥8 points was associated with rates of in-hospital mortality that increased from 0 to 37.7%, with an odds ratio of 2.13(2.03-2.25) per 1 index point. The c-statistic was 0.887 (0.881-0.893).
CONCLUSIONS
We conclude the Laniado-4 scale performed better than the Norton scale in predicting in-hospital mortality and that a simple frailty index that included the 4-question scale and categories of age, serum creatinine, and serum albumin performed as well or better than more complicated models.
期刊介绍:
In view of the ever-increasing fraction of elderly people, understanding the mechanisms of aging and age-related diseases has become a matter of urgent necessity. ''Gerontology'', the oldest journal in the field, responds to this need by drawing topical contributions from multiple disciplines to support the fundamental goals of extending active life and enhancing its quality. The range of papers is classified into four sections. In the Clinical Section, the aetiology, pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of agerelated diseases are discussed from a gerontological rather than a geriatric viewpoint. The Experimental Section contains up-to-date contributions from basic gerontological research. Papers dealing with behavioural development and related topics are placed in the Behavioural Science Section. Basic aspects of regeneration in different experimental biological systems as well as in the context of medical applications are dealt with in a special section that also contains information on technological advances for the elderly. Providing a primary source of high-quality papers covering all aspects of aging in humans and animals, ''Gerontology'' serves as an ideal information tool for all readers interested in the topic of aging from a broad perspective.