Closed reduction followed by percutaneous fixation of acute femoral neck fractures in young adults: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma Pub Date : 2024-09-05 DOI:10.1097/bot.0000000000002910
Christian Michelitsch,Benedikt Jochum,Andrin Baer,Samuel Haupt,Philipp F Stillhard,Jonathan Copp,Christoph Sommer
{"title":"Closed reduction followed by percutaneous fixation of acute femoral neck fractures in young adults: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Christian Michelitsch,Benedikt Jochum,Andrin Baer,Samuel Haupt,Philipp F Stillhard,Jonathan Copp,Christoph Sommer","doi":"10.1097/bot.0000000000002910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\r\nTo evaluate the surgical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young adults treated with a closed reduction technique as it pertains to reduction quality, rates of union and risk factors for complication.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nDesign: Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and electronic medical record review.\r\n\r\nSETTING\r\nLevel 1 Swiss Trauma center.\r\n\r\nPATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA\r\nBetween 2012 and 2021, young adults with isolated FNF (AO/OTA 31-B1) treated with percutaneous screw fixation were selected. Exclusion criteria were open reduction technique, age over 65 or under 16, pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures.\r\n\r\nOUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS\r\nPrimary outcome was quality of reduction, as assessed by three experienced trauma surgeons' evaluation of, intraoperative and/or first postoperative radiographs using the overall impression, the Garden's alignment index, and Lowell`s criteria. Additionally, clinical outcomes, conversion to arthroplasty and complications following closed reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures was reviewed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nA total of 54 patients with a median (IQR) age of 57.5 (48-60) years were included. Among them, 22 (41%) were female and 32 (59%) were male. The closed reduction technique demonstrated satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases. Major complications occurred in 19%, with 17% requiring conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Unacceptable or borderline acceptable reduction quality correlated significantly with the need for later conversion (p=0.03).\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nThe study supported the use of the closed reduction technique for acute FNF in patients under 65, achieving satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases with comparable complication rates to treatment of young femoral neck fractures with open reduction. Furthermore, it underscored the significance of the surgeon's overall impression of reduction quality, alongside the established reduction criteria, the Garden alignment index and Lowell's criteria, in evaluating the quality of the reduction. Additionally, risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty was associated with worse closed reduction quality.\r\n\r\nLEVEL OF EVIDENCE\r\nTherapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002910","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the surgical outcomes of femoral neck fractures (FNF) in young adults treated with a closed reduction technique as it pertains to reduction quality, rates of union and risk factors for complication. METHODS Design: Retrospective cohort study with radiograph and electronic medical record review. SETTING Level 1 Swiss Trauma center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA Between 2012 and 2021, young adults with isolated FNF (AO/OTA 31-B1) treated with percutaneous screw fixation were selected. Exclusion criteria were open reduction technique, age over 65 or under 16, pathologic fractures, associated femoral head or shaft fractures. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS Primary outcome was quality of reduction, as assessed by three experienced trauma surgeons' evaluation of, intraoperative and/or first postoperative radiographs using the overall impression, the Garden's alignment index, and Lowell`s criteria. Additionally, clinical outcomes, conversion to arthroplasty and complications following closed reduction and fixation of femoral neck fractures was reviewed. RESULTS A total of 54 patients with a median (IQR) age of 57.5 (48-60) years were included. Among them, 22 (41%) were female and 32 (59%) were male. The closed reduction technique demonstrated satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases. Major complications occurred in 19%, with 17% requiring conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Unacceptable or borderline acceptable reduction quality correlated significantly with the need for later conversion (p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS The study supported the use of the closed reduction technique for acute FNF in patients under 65, achieving satisfactory reduction results in up to 87% of cases with comparable complication rates to treatment of young femoral neck fractures with open reduction. Furthermore, it underscored the significance of the surgeon's overall impression of reduction quality, alongside the established reduction criteria, the Garden alignment index and Lowell's criteria, in evaluating the quality of the reduction. Additionally, risk of conversion to total hip arthroplasty was associated with worse closed reduction quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青壮年急性股骨颈骨折闭合复位后经皮固定术:一项回顾性队列研究。
目的 评估采用闭合复位技术治疗青壮年股骨颈骨折(FNF)的手术效果,包括复位质量、愈合率和并发症风险因素:患者选择标准:选择 2012 年至 2021 年期间接受经皮螺钉固定治疗的孤立性 FNF(AO/OTA 31-B1)青壮年患者。结果测量和比较主要结果是复位质量,由三位经验丰富的创伤外科医生使用整体印象、Garden对位指数和Lowell标准对术中和/或术后第一张X光片进行评估。此外,还对股骨颈骨折闭合复位固定术后的临床疗效、转为关节成形术和并发症进行了回顾性分析。其中女性 22 例(41%),男性 32 例(59%)。在多达 87% 的病例中,闭合复位技术取得了令人满意的复位效果。19%的病例出现了重大并发症,其中17%需要转为全髋关节置换术。结论:该研究支持对65岁以下的急性股骨颈骨折患者采用闭合复位术,高达87%的病例取得了满意的复位效果,并发症发生率与采用开放复位术治疗年轻股骨颈骨折的病例相当。此外,该研究还强调了外科医生对复位质量的总体印象以及既定的复位标准、Garden对位指数和Lowell标准在评估复位质量方面的重要性。此外,转为全髋关节置换术的风险与较差的闭合复位质量有关。有关证据等级的完整描述,请参阅 "作者须知"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
The Effects of a Stepped-Care Mental Health Program on Trauma Recidivism at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Tibial Malalignment is an Independent Predictor of Nonunion After Intramedullary Nailing of Tibial Shaft Fractures. Are Drains Associated With Infection After Operative Fixation of High-Risk Tibial Plateau and Pilon Fractures? The Use Of External Beam Radiation Therapy For Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis After Surgical Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. A Retrospective Study of Ballistic Pelvic Fractures With Focus on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1