Optimization of Nanowell-Based Label-Free Impedance Biosensor Based on Different Nanowell Structures

Biosensors Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.3390/bios14090426
Ali Fardoost, Hassan Raji, Mehdi Javanmard
{"title":"Optimization of Nanowell-Based Label-Free Impedance Biosensor Based on Different Nanowell Structures","authors":"Ali Fardoost, Hassan Raji, Mehdi Javanmard","doi":"10.3390/bios14090426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nanowell-based impedance-based label-free biosensors have demonstrated significant advantages in sensitivity, simplicity, and accuracy for detecting cancer biomarkers and macromolecules compared to conventional impedance-based biosensors. Although nanowell arrays have previously been employed for biomarker detection, a notable limitation exists in the photolithography step of their fabrication process, leading to a reduced efficiency rate. Historically, the diameter of these nanowells has been 2 μm. To address this issue, we propose alternative geometries for nanowells that feature larger surface areas while maintaining a similar circumference, thereby enhancing the fabrication efficiency of the biosensors. We investigated three geometries: tube, spiral, and quatrefoil. Impedance measurements of the samples were conducted at 10 min intervals using a lock-in amplifier. The study utilized interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibodies and antigens/proteins at a concentration of 100 nM as the target macromolecules. The results indicated that tube-shaped nanowells exhibited the highest sensitivity for detecting IL-6 protein, with an impedance change of 9.55%. In contrast, the spiral, quatrefoil, and circle geometries showed impedance changes of 0.91%, 0.95%, and 1.62%, respectively. Therefore, the tube-shaped nanowell structure presents a promising alternative to conventional nanowell arrays for future studies, potentially enhancing the efficiency and sensitivity of biosensor fabrication.","PeriodicalId":100185,"journal":{"name":"Biosensors","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosensors","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14090426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nanowell-based impedance-based label-free biosensors have demonstrated significant advantages in sensitivity, simplicity, and accuracy for detecting cancer biomarkers and macromolecules compared to conventional impedance-based biosensors. Although nanowell arrays have previously been employed for biomarker detection, a notable limitation exists in the photolithography step of their fabrication process, leading to a reduced efficiency rate. Historically, the diameter of these nanowells has been 2 μm. To address this issue, we propose alternative geometries for nanowells that feature larger surface areas while maintaining a similar circumference, thereby enhancing the fabrication efficiency of the biosensors. We investigated three geometries: tube, spiral, and quatrefoil. Impedance measurements of the samples were conducted at 10 min intervals using a lock-in amplifier. The study utilized interleukin-6 (IL-6) antibodies and antigens/proteins at a concentration of 100 nM as the target macromolecules. The results indicated that tube-shaped nanowells exhibited the highest sensitivity for detecting IL-6 protein, with an impedance change of 9.55%. In contrast, the spiral, quatrefoil, and circle geometries showed impedance changes of 0.91%, 0.95%, and 1.62%, respectively. Therefore, the tube-shaped nanowell structure presents a promising alternative to conventional nanowell arrays for future studies, potentially enhancing the efficiency and sensitivity of biosensor fabrication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于不同纳米孔结构的无标记纳米孔阻抗生物传感器的优化
与传统的基于阻抗的生物传感器相比,基于纳米孔的阻抗无标记生物传感器在检测癌症生物标记物和大分子的灵敏度、简便性和准确性方面具有显著优势。虽然纳米孔阵列以前曾被用于生物标记物检测,但其制造过程中的光刻步骤存在明显的局限性,导致效率降低。一直以来,这些纳米孔的直径都是 2 微米。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了纳米孔的替代几何形状,它们具有更大的表面积,同时保持相似的周长,从而提高了生物传感器的制造效率。我们研究了三种几何形状:管状、螺旋状和四叶形。使用锁相放大器每隔 10 分钟对样品进行一次阻抗测量。研究使用浓度为 100 nM 的白细胞介素-6(IL-6)抗体和抗原/蛋白质作为目标大分子。结果表明,管状纳米孔检测 IL-6 蛋白的灵敏度最高,阻抗变化率为 9.55%。相比之下,螺旋形、四叶形和圆形的阻抗变化分别为 0.91%、0.95% 和 1.62%。因此,在未来的研究中,管形纳米孔结构有望替代传统的纳米孔阵列,从而提高生物传感器制造的效率和灵敏度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy-Based Microfluidic Biosensor Using Cell-Imprinted Polymers for Bacteria Detection Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Biosensors Based on Allosteric Transcription Factors (aTFs) for Pb2+ Detection Salmonella Detection in Food Using a HEK-hTLR5 Reporter Cell-Based Sensor Paper-Based Microfluidic Device for Extracellular Lactate Detection Recent Electrochemical Advancements for Liquid-Biopsy Nucleic Acid Detection for Point-of-Care Prostate Cancer Diagnostics and Prognostics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1