Morphometric characteristics of charcoal produced from plants native to the southeastern United States of America (USA)

Richard S Vachula, Thomas M Cullen, Matthew R Galinger, J Conner Welch, Jeremiah Battaglia, Dallyn Smith, Matthew N Waters
{"title":"Morphometric characteristics of charcoal produced from plants native to the southeastern United States of America (USA)","authors":"Richard S Vachula, Thomas M Cullen, Matthew R Galinger, J Conner Welch, Jeremiah Battaglia, Dallyn Smith, Matthew N Waters","doi":"10.1177/09596836241274975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Charcoal shape variations provide insight into past fuel types burned, with charcoal length:width (L:W) being the most popular means of distinguishing fuel types. This paper presents morphometric data (L:W) of charcoal produced from plant taxa (n = 21) native to the southeastern United States of America (USA). These taxa included monocots (n = 3), dicots (n = 12), and gymnosperms (n = 6), which represented a range of growth habits including graminoids, trees, shrubs, and subshrubs. We further divided these taxa into tissues (n = 36 total samples) which included leaves, wood, bark, needles, stems, and a seed pod. Our results show that charcoal produced from plants native to southeastern USA exhibits more variable L:W values than those tested in previous research, but that when aggregated, they broadly agree with published L:W value ranges. Within the dicot group, leaves produced charcoal lower L:W values (median = 1.92, interquartile range (IQR) = 1.33) than wood (median = 2.43, IQR = 3.00), whereas the opposite was true for gymnosperms whose needles produced greater L:W values (median = 2.60, IQR = 3.22) than wood (median = 1.93, IQR = 1.44). The monocot graminoid we tested produced greater L:W values (median = 3.47, IQR = 6.02) than dicot or gymnosperm fuels. Further, our results provide conflicting perspectives on the likelihood of evolutionary relationships as the cause of variations in charcoal L:W values. Last, our results underscore the importance of site-specific experimental charcoal approaches to enable robust paleofire applications of charcoal morphometry.","PeriodicalId":517388,"journal":{"name":"The Holocene","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Holocene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09596836241274975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Charcoal shape variations provide insight into past fuel types burned, with charcoal length:width (L:W) being the most popular means of distinguishing fuel types. This paper presents morphometric data (L:W) of charcoal produced from plant taxa (n = 21) native to the southeastern United States of America (USA). These taxa included monocots (n = 3), dicots (n = 12), and gymnosperms (n = 6), which represented a range of growth habits including graminoids, trees, shrubs, and subshrubs. We further divided these taxa into tissues (n = 36 total samples) which included leaves, wood, bark, needles, stems, and a seed pod. Our results show that charcoal produced from plants native to southeastern USA exhibits more variable L:W values than those tested in previous research, but that when aggregated, they broadly agree with published L:W value ranges. Within the dicot group, leaves produced charcoal lower L:W values (median = 1.92, interquartile range (IQR) = 1.33) than wood (median = 2.43, IQR = 3.00), whereas the opposite was true for gymnosperms whose needles produced greater L:W values (median = 2.60, IQR = 3.22) than wood (median = 1.93, IQR = 1.44). The monocot graminoid we tested produced greater L:W values (median = 3.47, IQR = 6.02) than dicot or gymnosperm fuels. Further, our results provide conflicting perspectives on the likelihood of evolutionary relationships as the cause of variations in charcoal L:W values. Last, our results underscore the importance of site-specific experimental charcoal approaches to enable robust paleofire applications of charcoal morphometry.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美利坚合众国(美国)东南部原生植物所产木炭的形态特征
木炭形状的变化可以让人了解过去燃烧的燃料类型,而木炭的长度:宽度(L:W)是区分燃料类型的最常用方法。本文介绍了原产于美利坚合众国(USA)东南部的植物类群(n = 21)产生的木炭的形态计量数据(长:宽)。这些类群包括单子叶植物(n = 3)、双子叶植物(n = 12)和裸子植物(n = 6),代表了一系列生长习性,包括禾本科、乔木、灌木和亚灌木。我们将这些分类群进一步划分为不同的组织(n = 36 个样本),包括叶、木、树皮、针叶、茎和一个豆荚。我们的研究结果表明,原产于美国东南部的植物所产生的木炭的 L:W 值比以前研究中测试过的木炭的 L:W 值变化更大,但如果汇总起来,它们与已公布的 L:W 值范围基本一致。在双子叶植物组中,叶片产生的木炭 L:W 值(中位数 = 1.92,四分位数间距 (IQR) = 1.33)低于木材(中位数 = 2.43,四分位数间距 = 3.00),而裸子植物则相反,其针叶产生的 L:W 值(中位数 = 2.60,四分位数间距 = 3.22)高于木材(中位数 = 1.93,四分位数间距 = 1.44)。我们测试的单子叶禾本科植物产生的 L:W 值(中位数 = 3.47,IQR = 6.02)高于双子叶或裸子植物燃料。此外,对于木炭 L:W 值变化的原因是否可能是进化关系,我们的研究结果提供了相互矛盾的观点。最后,我们的研究结果强调了针对特定地点的木炭实验方法对于木炭形态计量学的古火灾应用的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sedimentological and geochemical proxies reveal changes in the South Atlantic Convergence Zone in Southeast South America during the Late-Holocene Landscape positioning of Neolithic mustatil stone structures along the margins of the Nefud Desert, Saudi Arabia Holocene hydroclimate synthesis of the Aegean: Diverging patterns, dry periods and implications for climate-society interactions Coprolite diversity from the archeological site Gruta Do Gentio Ll, Unaí, Minas Gerais, Brazil Ecological responses to solar forcing during the Homerian Climate Anomaly recorded by varved sediments from Holzmaar, Germany
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1