CACC: A Congestion-Aware Control Mechanism to Reduce INT Overhead and PFC Pause Delay

IF 4.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1109/TNSM.2024.3449699
Xiwen Jie;Jiangping Han;Guanglei Chen;Hang Wang;Peilin Hong;Kaiping Xue
{"title":"CACC: A Congestion-Aware Control Mechanism to Reduce INT Overhead and PFC Pause Delay","authors":"Xiwen Jie;Jiangping Han;Guanglei Chen;Hang Wang;Peilin Hong;Kaiping Xue","doi":"10.1109/TNSM.2024.3449699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) is gaining popularity in data centers for low CPU overhead, high throughput, and ultra-low latency. As one of the state-of-the-art RDMA Congestion Control (CC) mechanisms, HPCC leverages the In-band Network Telemetry (INT) features to achieve accurate control and significantly shortens the Flow Completion Time (FCT) for short flows. However, there exists redundant INT information increasing the processing latency at switches and affecting flows’ throughput. Besides, its end-to-end feedback mechanism is not timely enough to help senders cope well with bursty traffic, and there still exists a high probability of triggering Priority-based Flow Control (PFC) pauses under large-scale incast. In this paper, we propose a Congestion-Aware (CA) control mechanism called CACC, which attempts to push CC to the theoretical low INT overhead and PFC pause delay. CACC introduces two CA algorithms to quantize switch buffer and egress port congestion, separately, along with a fine-grained window size adjustment algorithm at the sender. Specifically, the buffer CA algorithm perceives large-scale congestion that may trigger PFC pauses and provides early feedback, significantly reducing the PFC pause delay. The egress port CA algorithm perceives the link state and selectively inserts useful INT data, achieving lower queue sizes and reducing the average overhead per packet from 42 bytes to 2 bits. In our evaluation, compared with HPCC, PINT, and Bolt, CACC shortens the average and tail FCT by up to 27% and 60.1%, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13423,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management","volume":"21 6","pages":"6382-6397"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10646375/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) is gaining popularity in data centers for low CPU overhead, high throughput, and ultra-low latency. As one of the state-of-the-art RDMA Congestion Control (CC) mechanisms, HPCC leverages the In-band Network Telemetry (INT) features to achieve accurate control and significantly shortens the Flow Completion Time (FCT) for short flows. However, there exists redundant INT information increasing the processing latency at switches and affecting flows’ throughput. Besides, its end-to-end feedback mechanism is not timely enough to help senders cope well with bursty traffic, and there still exists a high probability of triggering Priority-based Flow Control (PFC) pauses under large-scale incast. In this paper, we propose a Congestion-Aware (CA) control mechanism called CACC, which attempts to push CC to the theoretical low INT overhead and PFC pause delay. CACC introduces two CA algorithms to quantize switch buffer and egress port congestion, separately, along with a fine-grained window size adjustment algorithm at the sender. Specifically, the buffer CA algorithm perceives large-scale congestion that may trigger PFC pauses and provides early feedback, significantly reducing the PFC pause delay. The egress port CA algorithm perceives the link state and selectively inserts useful INT data, achieving lower queue sizes and reducing the average overhead per packet from 42 bytes to 2 bits. In our evaluation, compared with HPCC, PINT, and Bolt, CACC shortens the average and tail FCT by up to 27% and 60.1%, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CACC:减少 INT 开销和 PFC 暂停延迟的拥塞感知控制机制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management Computer Science-Computer Networks and Communications
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
325
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management will publish (online only) peerreviewed archival quality papers that advance the state-of-the-art and practical applications of network and service management. Theoretical research contributions (presenting new concepts and techniques) and applied contributions (reporting on experiences and experiments with actual systems) will be encouraged. These transactions will focus on the key technical issues related to: Management Models, Architectures and Frameworks; Service Provisioning, Reliability and Quality Assurance; Management Functions; Enabling Technologies; Information and Communication Models; Policies; Applications and Case Studies; Emerging Technologies and Standards.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Table of Contents Guest Editors’ Introduction: Special Issue on Robust and Resilient Future Communication Networks A Novel Adaptive Device-Free Passive Indoor Fingerprinting Localization Under Dynamic Environment HSS: A Memory-Efficient, Accurate, and Fast Network Measurement Framework in Sliding Windows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1