Needs, preferences, and patient participation for a randomized controlled trial on postneoadjuvant complete tumor response: A qualitative study of patients with esophageal cancer

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Supportive Care in Cancer Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s00520-024-08845-0
Manuel Czornik, Joachim Weis, Andrea Kiemen, Claudia Schmoor, Julian Hipp, Jens Hoeppner
{"title":"Needs, preferences, and patient participation for a randomized controlled trial on postneoadjuvant complete tumor response: A qualitative study of patients with esophageal cancer","authors":"Manuel Czornik, Joachim Weis, Andrea Kiemen, Claudia Schmoor, Julian Hipp, Jens Hoeppner","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08845-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>For patients with clinical complete response of non-metastatic esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the two treatment options obligate postneoadjuvant surgery as the current standard treatment (surgery on principle) versus active surveillance with surgery as needed only in recurring loco-regional tumor as a possible future alternative or standard exist. Since these treatments are presumably equivalent in terms of overall survival, patient-centered information can encourage the discussion with the treating physician and can make it easier for patients to make trade-offs between the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment alternatives in a highly distressed situation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A qualitative prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to create patient-centered information material that is based on patients’ preferences, needs, and concerns regarding the two treatment options, and to investigate the potential participation in a consecutive randomized controlled trial (RCT). Therefore, EC patients (<i>N</i> = 11) were asked about their attitudes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Concerns about the surgery and possible postoperative impairments in quality of life were identified as most mentioned negative aspects of surgery on principle, and recurrence and progression fear and the concern that surgery cannot be avoided anyways as most named negative aspects of surgery as needed. In regard to the participation in an RCT, making a contribution to science and the hope that the novel therapy would be superior to the established one were relevant arguments to participate. On the other hand, the lack of a proactive selection of treatment was named an important barrier to participation in an RCT.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The importance of adapting medical conversations to the patients’ lack of expertise and their exceptional cognitive and emotional situation is stressed. Results of this study can be used to improve patient-centered information and the recruitment of patients in RCTs in cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08845-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

For patients with clinical complete response of non-metastatic esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT), the two treatment options obligate postneoadjuvant surgery as the current standard treatment (surgery on principle) versus active surveillance with surgery as needed only in recurring loco-regional tumor as a possible future alternative or standard exist. Since these treatments are presumably equivalent in terms of overall survival, patient-centered information can encourage the discussion with the treating physician and can make it easier for patients to make trade-offs between the advantages and disadvantages of the treatment alternatives in a highly distressed situation.

Methods

A qualitative prospective cross-sectional study was conducted to create patient-centered information material that is based on patients’ preferences, needs, and concerns regarding the two treatment options, and to investigate the potential participation in a consecutive randomized controlled trial (RCT). Therefore, EC patients (N = 11) were asked about their attitudes.

Results

Concerns about the surgery and possible postoperative impairments in quality of life were identified as most mentioned negative aspects of surgery on principle, and recurrence and progression fear and the concern that surgery cannot be avoided anyways as most named negative aspects of surgery as needed. In regard to the participation in an RCT, making a contribution to science and the hope that the novel therapy would be superior to the established one were relevant arguments to participate. On the other hand, the lack of a proactive selection of treatment was named an important barrier to participation in an RCT.

Conclusion

The importance of adapting medical conversations to the patients’ lack of expertise and their exceptional cognitive and emotional situation is stressed. Results of this study can be used to improve patient-centered information and the recruitment of patients in RCTs in cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于新辅助治疗后肿瘤完全反应的随机对照试验的需求、偏好和患者参与情况:食管癌患者的定性研究
目的对于新辅助化放疗(nCRT)或新辅助化疗(nCT)后临床完全反应的非转移性食管癌(EC)患者,有两种治疗方案可供选择,一种是将新辅助治疗后手术作为当前的标准治疗(原则上手术),另一种是进行积极监测,仅在局部区域肿瘤复发时才进行手术,作为未来可能的替代治疗或标准治疗。由于这些治疗方法在总生存期方面可能是等同的,因此以患者为中心的信息可以鼓励患者与主治医生进行讨论,并使患者在高度痛苦的情况下更容易权衡治疗方案的利弊。方法:我们开展了一项前瞻性横断面定性研究,根据患者对两种治疗方案的偏好、需求和顾虑制作以患者为中心的信息资料,并调查参与连续随机对照试验(RCT)的可能性。结果发现,对手术和术后可能出现的生活质量下降的担忧是原则上最常提及的手术负面因素,而对复发和进展的恐惧以及对无论如何都无法避免手术的担忧则是最常提及的手术负面因素。至于参与 RCT,为科学做出贡献以及希望新疗法优于既有疗法是参与 RCT 的相关理由。另一方面,缺乏主动选择治疗方法被认为是参与 RCT 的一个重要障碍。本研究的结果可用于改善以患者为中心的信息以及癌症 RCT 患者的招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
期刊最新文献
Co-creating a yoga program for women diagnosed with gynecologic cancer: a consensus study The impacts of cancer treatment on lifestyle habits and mental health in Vietnamese women: an exploratory qualitative study Needs, preferences, and patient participation for a randomized controlled trial on postneoadjuvant complete tumor response: A qualitative study of patients with esophageal cancer A large population-based and validated study on the follow-up management and supportive strategy of locally advanced rectal cancer patients Clinical efficacy of a rehabilitation management protocol for urinary incontinence after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1