Disclosure Decisions of Workers Living with a Chronic Health Condition Causing Disability at Work: Are Decisions to Disclose to Co-workers and Supervisors Different?

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s10926-024-10235-6
Gemma Woticky, Arif Jetha, Emile Tompa, Monique A. M. Gignac
{"title":"Disclosure Decisions of Workers Living with a Chronic Health Condition Causing Disability at Work: Are Decisions to Disclose to Co-workers and Supervisors Different?","authors":"Gemma Woticky, Arif Jetha, Emile Tompa, Monique A. M. Gignac","doi":"10.1007/s10926-024-10235-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>Individuals living with chronic physical or mental health/cognitive conditions must make decisions that are sometimes difficult about whether to disclose health information at work. This research investigated workers’ decisions to not to disclose any information at work, disclosure to a supervisor only, co-workers only, or to both a supervisor and co-workers. It also examined personal, health, and work factors associated with disclosure to different groups compared to not disclosing information.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Employed workers with a physical or mental health/cognitive condition were recruited for a cross-sectional survey from a national panel of Canadians. Respondents were asked about disclosure decisions, demographics, health, working experience, work context, and work perceptions. Multinomial logistic regressions examined predictors of disclosure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There were 882 respondents (57.9% women). Most had disclosed to both co-workers and supervisors (44.2%) with 23.6% disclosing to co-workers only and 7% to a supervisor only. Age, health variability, and number of accommodations used were significant predictors of disclosure for all groups. Job disruptions were associated with disclosure to supervisors only and pain and comfort sharing were associated with co-worker disclosure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The findings highlight that disclosure to co-workers is common despite being an overlooked group in workplace disclosure research. Although many similar factors predicted disclosure to different groups, further research on workplace environments and culture would be useful in efforts to enhance workplace support.</p>","PeriodicalId":48035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10235-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Individuals living with chronic physical or mental health/cognitive conditions must make decisions that are sometimes difficult about whether to disclose health information at work. This research investigated workers’ decisions to not to disclose any information at work, disclosure to a supervisor only, co-workers only, or to both a supervisor and co-workers. It also examined personal, health, and work factors associated with disclosure to different groups compared to not disclosing information.

Methods

Employed workers with a physical or mental health/cognitive condition were recruited for a cross-sectional survey from a national panel of Canadians. Respondents were asked about disclosure decisions, demographics, health, working experience, work context, and work perceptions. Multinomial logistic regressions examined predictors of disclosure.

Results

There were 882 respondents (57.9% women). Most had disclosed to both co-workers and supervisors (44.2%) with 23.6% disclosing to co-workers only and 7% to a supervisor only. Age, health variability, and number of accommodations used were significant predictors of disclosure for all groups. Job disruptions were associated with disclosure to supervisors only and pain and comfort sharing were associated with co-worker disclosure.

Conclusion

The findings highlight that disclosure to co-workers is common despite being an overlooked group in workplace disclosure research. Although many similar factors predicted disclosure to different groups, further research on workplace environments and culture would be useful in efforts to enhance workplace support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有导致工作残疾的慢性病的工人的披露决定:向同事和上司披露的决定是否不同?
目的患有慢性躯体或精神健康/认知疾病的个人必须就是否在工作中披露健康信息做出有时会很困难的决定。本研究调查了工人在工作中决定不披露任何信息、只向主管披露信息、只向同事披露信息或同时向主管和同事披露信息的情况。研究还考察了与向不同群体披露信息和不披露信息相比,与披露信息相关的个人、健康和工作因素。方法从一个全国性的加拿大人小组中招募有身体或精神健康/认知状况的就业者进行横断面调查。受访者被问及披露信息的决定、人口统计学、健康状况、工作经验、工作环境和工作感知。结果共有 882 名受访者(57.9% 为女性)。大多数受访者同时向同事和上司披露了病情(44.2%),23.6%的受访者只向同事披露了病情,7%的受访者只向上司披露了病情。年龄、健康状况的多变性和所使用的便利措施的数量是所有群体披露信息的重要预测因素。工作干扰与仅向主管披露有关,而疼痛和舒适分享与同事披露有关。尽管许多类似的因素都预示着向不同群体的披露,但对工作场所环境和文化的进一步研究将有助于加强工作场所的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
12.10%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original papers on the rehabilitation, reintegration, and prevention of disability in workers. The journal offers investigations involving original data collection and research synthesis (i.e., scoping reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses). Papers derive from a broad array of fields including rehabilitation medicine, physical and occupational therapy, health psychology and psychiatry, orthopedics, oncology, occupational and insurance medicine, neurology, social work, ergonomics, biomedical engineering, health economics, rehabilitation engineering, business administration and management, and law.  A single interdisciplinary source for information on work disability rehabilitation, the Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation helps to advance the scientific understanding, management, and prevention of work disability.
期刊最新文献
Test-Retest Reliability, Clinical Usefulness, and Telephone Application of the Work Limitation Questionnaire in Individuals Who Returned to Work After Stroke. Workplace Accommodations and the Labor Force Status of Persons with Disabilities. The Era of Technology in Healthcare-An Evaluation of Telerehabilitation on Client Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Psychological Service Utilization and its Impact on Return to Work in Vocational Retraining Centers: A Cohort Study Correction: Tensions of Low-Back Pain and Lifting; Bridging Clinical Low-Back Pain and Occupational Lifting Guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1