Evaluation of 16S-Based Metagenomic NGS as Diagnostic Tool in Different Types of Culture-Negative Infections

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Pathogens Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.3390/pathogens13090743
Sara Giordana Rimoldi, Alessandro Tamoni, Alberto Rizzo, Concetta Longobardi, Cristina Pagani, Federica Salari, Caterina Matinato, Chiara Vismara, Gloria Gagliardi, Miriam Cutrera, Maria Rita Gismondo
{"title":"Evaluation of 16S-Based Metagenomic NGS as Diagnostic Tool in Different Types of Culture-Negative Infections","authors":"Sara Giordana Rimoldi, Alessandro Tamoni, Alberto Rizzo, Concetta Longobardi, Cristina Pagani, Federica Salari, Caterina Matinato, Chiara Vismara, Gloria Gagliardi, Miriam Cutrera, Maria Rita Gismondo","doi":"10.3390/pathogens13090743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bacterial infections pose significant global health challenges, often underestimated due to difficulties in accurate diagnosis, especially when culture-based diagnostics fail. This study assesses the effectiveness of 16S-based metagenomic next generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying pathogens in culture-negative clinical samples across various medical settings. Overall, 48% of samples were collected from orthopedics, 15% from neurosurgery, and 12% in cardiac surgery, among others. The detection rate of monomicrobial infections was 68.6%, and 5.7% for polymicrobial infections. In addition, NGS detected bacteria in all samples from the lungs, head and neck, and eye specimens. Cutibacterium acnes (11%, 12/105) was the most frequent microorganism, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (10.4%, 11/105), and Staphylococcus aureus (9.5%, 10/105). In conclusion, 16S-targeted metagenomic sequencing enhances pathogen detection capabilities, particularly in instances where traditional cultures fail. By the combination of NGS and bacterial cultures, microbiologists might provide a more accurate diagnosis, guiding more effective treatments and potentially reducing healthcare costs associated with empirical treatments.","PeriodicalId":19758,"journal":{"name":"Pathogens","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathogens","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13090743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bacterial infections pose significant global health challenges, often underestimated due to difficulties in accurate diagnosis, especially when culture-based diagnostics fail. This study assesses the effectiveness of 16S-based metagenomic next generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying pathogens in culture-negative clinical samples across various medical settings. Overall, 48% of samples were collected from orthopedics, 15% from neurosurgery, and 12% in cardiac surgery, among others. The detection rate of monomicrobial infections was 68.6%, and 5.7% for polymicrobial infections. In addition, NGS detected bacteria in all samples from the lungs, head and neck, and eye specimens. Cutibacterium acnes (11%, 12/105) was the most frequent microorganism, followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (10.4%, 11/105), and Staphylococcus aureus (9.5%, 10/105). In conclusion, 16S-targeted metagenomic sequencing enhances pathogen detection capabilities, particularly in instances where traditional cultures fail. By the combination of NGS and bacterial cultures, microbiologists might provide a more accurate diagnosis, guiding more effective treatments and potentially reducing healthcare costs associated with empirical treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将基于 16S 的元基因组 NGS 作为不同类型培养阴性感染的诊断工具的评估
细菌感染是全球健康面临的重大挑战,由于难以准确诊断,尤其是在培养诊断失败的情况下,细菌感染往往被低估。本研究评估了基于 16S 的元基因组下一代测序(NGS)在不同医疗环境中鉴定培养阴性临床样本中病原体的有效性。总体而言,采集的样本中有 48% 来自骨科,15% 来自神经外科,12% 来自心脏外科等。单微生物感染的检出率为 68.6%,多微生物感染的检出率为 5.7%。此外,NGS 在肺部、头颈部和眼部标本的所有样本中都检测到了细菌。痤疮杆菌(11%,12/105)是最常见的微生物,其次是表皮葡萄球菌(10.4%,11/105)和金黄色葡萄球菌(9.5%,10/105)。总之,16S 靶向元基因组测序提高了病原体检测能力,尤其是在传统培养失败的情况下。通过 NGS 与细菌培养的结合,微生物学家可以提供更准确的诊断,指导更有效的治疗,并有可能降低与经验性治疗相关的医疗成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pathogens
Pathogens Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
1285
审稿时长
17.75 days
期刊介绍: Pathogens (ISSN 2076-0817) publishes reviews, regular research papers and short notes on all aspects of pathogens and pathogen-host interactions. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles.
期刊最新文献
Group B Streptococcus Infections in Non-Pregnant Adults, Italy, 2015–2019 HPV and Penile Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Clinical Insights Parasites Diversity, Abundance, Prevalence, and Richness Infecting Didelphis aurita (Didelphimorphia: Didelphidae) in the Atlantic Rainforest, Brazil The Negative Impact of Maternal HIV Infection on Birth Outcomes—Myth or Reality? First Case Report of Mycotic Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Caused by Campylobacter fetus in Serbia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1