Budget impact of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer from a third-party US payer perspective.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Economics Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1080/13696998.2024.2403278
Solomon J Lubinga,Lydia Walder,Mark Burton,Qin Shen
{"title":"Budget impact of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer from a third-party US payer perspective.","authors":"Solomon J Lubinga,Lydia Walder,Mark Burton,Qin Shen","doi":"10.1080/13696998.2024.2403278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nDostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) significantly increased progression-free survival in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) vs CP alone in the RUBY trial (NCT03981796). This analysis estimated the per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP as a treatment alternative from a third-party US payer perspective.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nA budget impact model was developed to estimate the costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP into commercial and Medicare health plans over a 3-year time horizon (2023-2025). Costs were sourced from relevant literature and US-specific databases and were calculated using epidemiology data, clinical inputs, treatment costs, and market share estimates. Clinical inputs were sourced from primary clinical trials for each respective treatment (ie, dostarlimab + CP, CP, pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, bevacizumab + CP, and pembrolizumab + CP). Current and future market shares assumed dostarlimab + CP reduced the market share of CP only. Analyses were performed in mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and overall populations using a US 2023 cost year.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nFor a commercial plan, the model estimated (dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations) that 7 and 26 patients would be treated with dostarlimab + CP, respectively; average annual budget impacts per patient treated were $118,257 and $116,094; average budget impacts per patient treated per month (PPPM) were $9,855 and $9,675; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.02 and $0.06. For a Medicare plan, the model estimated that 28 and 93 patients, respectively, would be treated with dostarlimab + CP. Average annual budget impacts per patient treated and PPPM were the same as those for the commercial plan in both populations; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.07 and $0.22, respectively.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nIntroducing dostarlimab + CP as a first-line treatment for patients with pA/rEC results in minimal budget impact PMPM from a US third-party payers' perspective. Together with the efficacy and safety results from RUBY, these results support the use of dostarlimab + CP as a treatment option.","PeriodicalId":16229,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Economics","volume":"61 1","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2024.2403278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) significantly increased progression-free survival in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) vs CP alone in the RUBY trial (NCT03981796). This analysis estimated the per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP as a treatment alternative from a third-party US payer perspective. MATERIALS AND METHODS A budget impact model was developed to estimate the costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP into commercial and Medicare health plans over a 3-year time horizon (2023-2025). Costs were sourced from relevant literature and US-specific databases and were calculated using epidemiology data, clinical inputs, treatment costs, and market share estimates. Clinical inputs were sourced from primary clinical trials for each respective treatment (ie, dostarlimab + CP, CP, pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, bevacizumab + CP, and pembrolizumab + CP). Current and future market shares assumed dostarlimab + CP reduced the market share of CP only. Analyses were performed in mismatch repair-deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and overall populations using a US 2023 cost year. RESULTS For a commercial plan, the model estimated (dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations) that 7 and 26 patients would be treated with dostarlimab + CP, respectively; average annual budget impacts per patient treated were $118,257 and $116,094; average budget impacts per patient treated per month (PPPM) were $9,855 and $9,675; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.02 and $0.06. For a Medicare plan, the model estimated that 28 and 93 patients, respectively, would be treated with dostarlimab + CP. Average annual budget impacts per patient treated and PPPM were the same as those for the commercial plan in both populations; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.07 and $0.22, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Introducing dostarlimab + CP as a first-line treatment for patients with pA/rEC results in minimal budget impact PMPM from a US third-party payers' perspective. Together with the efficacy and safety results from RUBY, these results support the use of dostarlimab + CP as a treatment option.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从美国第三方支付机构的角度看多司他单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇治疗原发性晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌的预算影响。
目的在 RUBY 试验(NCT03981796)中,多斯他利单抗联合卡铂-紫杉醇(CP)与单用 CP 相比,可显著提高原发性晚期或复发性子宫内膜癌(pA/rEC)患者的无进展生存期。本分析从美国第三方支付方的角度估算了引入多司他利单抗 + CP 作为治疗替代方案的每会员每月 (PMPM) 成本。材料和方法开发了预算影响模型,以估算在 3 年时间跨度(2023-2025 年)内将多司他利单抗 + CP 引入商业和医疗保险健康计划的成本。成本来源于相关文献和美国特定数据库,并通过流行病学数据、临床投入、治疗成本和市场份额估算进行计算。临床投入来源于每种治疗方法(即多司他林单抗 + CP、CP、pembrolizumab、pembrolizumab + lenvatinib、贝伐珠单抗 + CP 和 pembrolizumab + CP)的主要临床试验。目前和未来的市场份额假定多司他利单抗 + CP 仅减少了 CP 的市场份额。使用美国 2023 成本年对错配修复缺陷/微卫星不稳定性高(dMMR/MSI-H)人群和总体人群进行了分析。结果对于商业计划,模型估计(dMMR/MSI-H 和总体人群)将分别有 7 名和 26 名患者接受多司他利单抗 + CP 治疗;每名接受治疗的患者的年均预算影响分别为 118,257 美元和 116,094 美元;每名接受治疗的患者的月均预算影响 (PPPM) 分别为 9,855 美元和 9,675 美元;每名接受治疗的患者的月均预算影响分别为 0.02 美元和 0.06 美元。对于一项医疗保险计划,模型估计将分别有 28 名和 93 名患者接受多司他利单抗 + CP 治疗。结论从美国第三方支付机构的角度来看,将多斯他利单抗+CP 作为 pA/rEC 患者的一线治疗方法对 PMPM 的预算影响极小。结合 RUBY 的疗效和安全性结果,这些结果支持将多斯他利单抗+CP 作为一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Economics
Journal of Medical Economics HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Economics'' mission is to provide ethical, unbiased and rapid publication of quality content that is validated by rigorous peer review. The aim of Journal of Medical Economics is to serve the information needs of the pharmacoeconomics and healthcare research community, to help translate research advances into patient care and be a leader in transparency/disclosure by facilitating a collaborative and honest approach to publication. Journal of Medical Economics publishes high-quality economic assessments of novel therapeutic and device interventions for an international audience
期刊最新文献
The burden of venous thromboembolism in ten countries: a cost-of-illness Markov model on surgical and ICU patients. The impact of KRAS mutational status on patient-reported outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a cross sectional study in France and Germany. The indirect costs of five cancers in Egypt: years of life lost and productivity costs. Healthcare resource utilization and costs among treatment-naïve people with HIV in state Medicaids: analysis of multi-tablet vs. single-tablet antiretroviral regimen initiators with and without concurrent mental health disorders. Cost-utility analysis of newborn screening for spinal muscular atrophy in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1