Microbial Community of Subsoiling Have a Stronger Ability to Utilize Carbon Sources Across Aggregate Classes in an Anniversary Rotation

IF 3.4 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s42729-024-01983-8
Ruxin Li, Xinkun Liu, Yi Lv, Qisong Gao, Yingxin Yu, Huifang Han
{"title":"Microbial Community of Subsoiling Have a Stronger Ability to Utilize Carbon Sources Across Aggregate Classes in an Anniversary Rotation","authors":"Ruxin Li, Xinkun Liu, Yi Lv, Qisong Gao, Yingxin Yu, Huifang Han","doi":"10.1007/s42729-024-01983-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>The goal of global carbon (C) neutralization has raised concerns about the potential of soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, particularly regarding the role of soil microbial activities across aggregate classes. Reasonable tillage methods drive microbial community within soil aggregates, so have a stronger ability to utilize carbon sources. However, simultaneously studying the effects of tillage methods through microbial activity, functional and structural diversity at the aggregate level is relatively rare, and seasonal changes in the ability to utilize carbon sources of microbial communities remain largely unknown.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Initial from 2002, a 14-year long-term tillage experiment started; then in 2016–2017, we tested the following tillage methods: no tillage (NT), rotary tillage (RT), subsoiling (ST) and conventional tillage (CT).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Compared with CT, ST had the most significant promoting effect on microbial activity across aggregate classes, and microbial activity (ATP and SIR) decreased with the aggregate classes decreasing. ATP and SIR increased by 3.23 µmol·g<sup>− 1</sup> and 15.94 µg CO<sub>2</sub>·g<sup>− 1</sup>·d<sup>− 1</sup> in winter wheat growth, and increased by 2.39 µmol·g<sup>− 1</sup> and 31.16 µg CO<sub>2</sub>·g<sup>− 1</sup>·d<sup>− 1</sup> in summer maize growth. Microbial communities in aggregates under ST and NT had greater diversity and ability to utilize carbon sources compared with CT, and those function showed the order of 5 − 2 &gt; 2-0.25 &gt; 0.25–0.053 mm. The microbial activity and diversity were higher in summer maize growth.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Therefore, ST is a promising tillage method for enhancing the soil microbial activity and diversity. Our study provides a fundamental understanding for the utilization of carbon sources by microbial community whithin aggregate level and highlights the importance of reasonable tillage methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":17042,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-024-01983-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The goal of global carbon (C) neutralization has raised concerns about the potential of soil organic carbon (SOC) storage, particularly regarding the role of soil microbial activities across aggregate classes. Reasonable tillage methods drive microbial community within soil aggregates, so have a stronger ability to utilize carbon sources. However, simultaneously studying the effects of tillage methods through microbial activity, functional and structural diversity at the aggregate level is relatively rare, and seasonal changes in the ability to utilize carbon sources of microbial communities remain largely unknown.

Methods

Initial from 2002, a 14-year long-term tillage experiment started; then in 2016–2017, we tested the following tillage methods: no tillage (NT), rotary tillage (RT), subsoiling (ST) and conventional tillage (CT).

Results

Compared with CT, ST had the most significant promoting effect on microbial activity across aggregate classes, and microbial activity (ATP and SIR) decreased with the aggregate classes decreasing. ATP and SIR increased by 3.23 µmol·g− 1 and 15.94 µg CO2·g− 1·d− 1 in winter wheat growth, and increased by 2.39 µmol·g− 1 and 31.16 µg CO2·g− 1·d− 1 in summer maize growth. Microbial communities in aggregates under ST and NT had greater diversity and ability to utilize carbon sources compared with CT, and those function showed the order of 5 − 2 > 2-0.25 > 0.25–0.053 mm. The microbial activity and diversity were higher in summer maize growth.

Conclusions

Therefore, ST is a promising tillage method for enhancing the soil microbial activity and diversity. Our study provides a fundamental understanding for the utilization of carbon sources by microbial community whithin aggregate level and highlights the importance of reasonable tillage methods.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在周年轮作中,土壤下层微生物群落利用各种骨料类碳源的能力更强
目的 全球碳(C)中和的目标引起了人们对土壤有机碳(SOC)储存潜力的关注,尤其是对不同类别的土壤团聚体中土壤微生物活动的作用的关注。合理的耕作方法能推动土壤团聚体中微生物群落的发展,因此具有更强的利用碳源的能力。然而,通过微生物活动、功能和结构多样性同时研究耕作方法对团聚体的影响的研究相对较少,而且微生物群落利用碳源能力的季节性变化在很大程度上仍是未知的。方法最初从2002年开始,我们进行了为期14年的长期耕作试验;然后在2016-2017年,我们测试了以下耕作方法:免耕(NT)、旋耕(RT)、覆土(ST)和常规耕作(CT)。结果与CT相比,ST对各骨料等级的微生物活性具有最显著的促进作用,微生物活性(ATP和SIR)随着骨料等级的降低而降低。冬小麦生长过程中的 ATP 和 SIR 分别增加了 3.23 µmol-g- 1 和 15.94 µg CO2-g- 1-d-1,夏玉米生长过程中的 ATP 和 SIR 分别增加了 2.39 µmol-g- 1 和 31.16 µg CO2-g- 1-d-1。与 CT 相比,ST 和 NT 条件下聚集体中的微生物群落具有更高的多样性和利用碳源的能力,其功能呈现 5 - 2 > 2-0.25 > 0.25-0.053 mm 的顺序。因此,ST 是一种很有前景的提高土壤微生物活性和多样性的耕作方法。我们的研究从根本上了解了微生物群落在集聚水平上对碳源的利用,并强调了合理耕作方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Soil Science
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
331
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition is an international, peer reviewed journal devoted to publishing original research findings in the areas of soil science, plant nutrition, agriculture and environmental science. Soil sciences submissions may cover physics, chemistry, biology, microbiology, mineralogy, ecology, pedology, soil classification and amelioration. Plant nutrition and agriculture submissions may include plant production, physiology and metabolism of plants, plant ecology, diversity and sustainability of agricultural systems, organic and inorganic fertilization in relation to their impact on yields, quality of plants and ecological systems, and agroecosystems studies. Submissions covering soil degradation, environmental pollution, nature conservation, and environmental protection are also welcome. The journal considers for publication original research articles, technical notes, short communication, and reviews (both voluntary and by invitation), and letters to the editor.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Management Practices for Improving Productivity, Profitability, and Energy-Carbon-Water Use Efficiency of Intensive Rice-toria-Sweet Corn System in Eastern India Enhancing Photosynthesis Pigment, Protein Content, Nutrient Uptake and Yield in Maize (Zea mays L.) Cultivars Using Vermicompost, Livestock Manure and Azotobacter chroococcum Phosphorus Solubilizing Microorganisms: An Eco-Friendly Approach for Sustainable Plant Health and Bioremediation Effect of Exogenous Chitosan on Physiological Characteristics, Photosynthetic Parameters, and Antioxidant Systems of Maize Seedlings Under Salt Stress Auxin-Mediated Modulation of Maize Rhizosphere Microbiome: Insights from Azospirillum Inoculation and Indole-3-Acetic Acid Treatment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1