Evaluating the impact of different point cloud sampling techniques on digital elevation model accuracy – a case study of Kituro, Kenya

IF 2.7 4区 地球科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Earth Science Informatics Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s12145-024-01440-1
Mary Wamai, Qulin Tan
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of different point cloud sampling techniques on digital elevation model accuracy – a case study of Kituro, Kenya","authors":"Mary Wamai, Qulin Tan","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01440-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data are crucial for terrain analysis applications. As established in the literature, higher point density improves terrain representation but requires greater data storage and processing capacities. Therefore, point cloud sampling is necessary to reduce densities while preserving DEM accuracy as much as possible. However, there has been a limited examination directly comparing the effects of various sampling algorithms on DEM accuracy. This study aimed to help fill this gap by evaluating and comparing the performance of three common point cloud sampling methods octree, spatial, and random sampling methods in high terrain. DEMs were then generated from the sampled point clouds using three different interpolation algorithms: inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor (NN), and ordinary kriging (OK). The results showed that octree sampling consistently produced the most accurate DEMs across all metrics and terrain slopes compared to other methods. Spatial sampling also produced more accurate DEMs than random sampling but was less accurate than octree sampling. The results can be attributed to differences in how the sampling methods represent terrain geometry and retain microtopographic detail. Octree sampling recursively subdivides the point cloud based on density distributions, closely conforming to complex microtopography. In contrast, random sampling disregards underlying densities, reducing accuracy in rough terrain. The findings guide optimal sampling and interpolation methods of airborne lidar point clouds for generating DEMs for similar complex mountainous terrains.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01440-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate digital elevation models (DEMs) derived from airborne light detection and ranging (LiDAR) data are crucial for terrain analysis applications. As established in the literature, higher point density improves terrain representation but requires greater data storage and processing capacities. Therefore, point cloud sampling is necessary to reduce densities while preserving DEM accuracy as much as possible. However, there has been a limited examination directly comparing the effects of various sampling algorithms on DEM accuracy. This study aimed to help fill this gap by evaluating and comparing the performance of three common point cloud sampling methods octree, spatial, and random sampling methods in high terrain. DEMs were then generated from the sampled point clouds using three different interpolation algorithms: inverse distance weighting (IDW), natural neighbor (NN), and ordinary kriging (OK). The results showed that octree sampling consistently produced the most accurate DEMs across all metrics and terrain slopes compared to other methods. Spatial sampling also produced more accurate DEMs than random sampling but was less accurate than octree sampling. The results can be attributed to differences in how the sampling methods represent terrain geometry and retain microtopographic detail. Octree sampling recursively subdivides the point cloud based on density distributions, closely conforming to complex microtopography. In contrast, random sampling disregards underlying densities, reducing accuracy in rough terrain. The findings guide optimal sampling and interpolation methods of airborne lidar point clouds for generating DEMs for similar complex mountainous terrains.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估不同点云采样技术对数字高程模型精度的影响--肯尼亚基图罗案例研究
从机载光探测与测距(LiDAR)数据中提取的精确数字高程模型(DEM)对于地形分析应用至关重要。根据文献记载,较高的点密度可以提高地形的代表性,但需要更大的数据存储和处理能力。因此,有必要进行点云采样,以降低密度,同时尽可能保持 DEM 的精度。然而,直接比较各种采样算法对 DEM 精度的影响的研究还很有限。本研究旨在通过评估和比较八叉树、空间和随机三种常见点云采样方法在高地形中的性能,帮助填补这一空白。然后使用三种不同的插值算法:反距离加权 (IDW)、自然邻接 (NN) 和普通克里金 (OK),从采样点云生成 DEM。结果表明,在所有指标和地形坡度方面,与其他方法相比,八叉树采样始终能生成最精确的 DEM。空间取样也比随机取样生成了更精确的 DEM,但精确度低于八叉树取样。这些结果可归因于取样方法在表示地形几何形状和保留微地形细节方面的差异。八叉树采样根据密度分布递归细分点云,与复杂的微地形密切相关。相比之下,随机取样忽略了底层密度,降低了粗糙地形中的精度。这些发现为机载激光雷达点云的最佳采样和插值方法提供了指导,以便为类似的复杂山区地形生成 DEM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Science Informatics
Earth Science Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of the elastic modulus of basaltic rocks using machine learning methods Feature-adaptive FPN with multiscale context integration for underwater object detection Autoregressive modelling of tropospheric radio refractivity over selected locations in tropical Nigeria using artificial neural network Time series land subsidence monitoring and prediction based on SBAS-InSAR and GeoTemporal transformer model Drought index time series forecasting via three-in-one machine learning concept for the Euphrates basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1