Muge Agca, Aslıhan Yucel, Efdal Kaya, Ali İhsan Daloglu, Mert Kayalık, Mevlut Yetkin, Femin Yalcın
{"title":"Machine learning algorithms for building height estimations using ICESat-2/ATLAS and Airborne LiDAR data","authors":"Muge Agca, Aslıhan Yucel, Efdal Kaya, Ali İhsan Daloglu, Mert Kayalık, Mevlut Yetkin, Femin Yalcın","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01429-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Building height information is essential for determining urban morphology, urban planning studies, and manage sustainable growth. This study aims to use machine learning algorithms to estimate building heights from airborne LiDAR and spaceborne ICESat-2/ATLAS data. The performance of different machine learning algorithms was investigated when analyzing ICESat-2/ATLAS and airborne LiDAR data. The accuracy of building height information was compared with field measurements. Machine learning algorithms such as K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Random Sample and Consensus (RANSAC) were used to classify spaceborne and airborne LiDAR data. Among all the algorithms applied to ICESat-2/ATLAS, the RF algorithm provided the best results for the strong and weak beams with 0.9683 and 0.9614, respectively. The K-NN yielded the best result for the airborne LiDAR dataset with 0.9999. Statistical analyzes were applied to both LiDAR datasets. The results of statistical analyzes for the pair of field measurement and ICESat-2 were R<sup>2</sup> = 0.9894, RMSE = 0.4131, MSE = 0.1706, MAE = 0.3184, and ME = 0.0003; for the pair of field measurement and airborne LiDAR: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8368, RMSE = 1.9646, MSE = 3.8597, MAE = 1.0586, and ME = -0.3450; and for the pair of airborne LiDAR and ICESat-2: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8275, RMSE = 1.6664, MSE = 2.7770, MAE = 0.9040, and ME = 0.4598. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the data obtained from the ICESat-2 system was successful in estimating building height and provided reliable data.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01429-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Building height information is essential for determining urban morphology, urban planning studies, and manage sustainable growth. This study aims to use machine learning algorithms to estimate building heights from airborne LiDAR and spaceborne ICESat-2/ATLAS data. The performance of different machine learning algorithms was investigated when analyzing ICESat-2/ATLAS and airborne LiDAR data. The accuracy of building height information was compared with field measurements. Machine learning algorithms such as K-Nearest Neighbors (K-NN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), and Random Sample and Consensus (RANSAC) were used to classify spaceborne and airborne LiDAR data. Among all the algorithms applied to ICESat-2/ATLAS, the RF algorithm provided the best results for the strong and weak beams with 0.9683 and 0.9614, respectively. The K-NN yielded the best result for the airborne LiDAR dataset with 0.9999. Statistical analyzes were applied to both LiDAR datasets. The results of statistical analyzes for the pair of field measurement and ICESat-2 were R2 = 0.9894, RMSE = 0.4131, MSE = 0.1706, MAE = 0.3184, and ME = 0.0003; for the pair of field measurement and airborne LiDAR: R2 = 0.8368, RMSE = 1.9646, MSE = 3.8597, MAE = 1.0586, and ME = -0.3450; and for the pair of airborne LiDAR and ICESat-2: R2 = 0.8275, RMSE = 1.6664, MSE = 2.7770, MAE = 0.9040, and ME = 0.4598. As a result of the analysis, it was seen that the data obtained from the ICESat-2 system was successful in estimating building height and provided reliable data.
期刊介绍:
The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.