The burden of headache disorders in the adult population of Mongolia: estimates, and a health-care needs assessment, from a cross-sectional population-based study

Otgonbayar Luvsannorov, Byambasuren Tsenddorj, Dorjkhand Baldorj, Selenge Enkhtuya, Delgermaa Purev, Andreas Husøy, Timothy J. Steiner
{"title":"The burden of headache disorders in the adult population of Mongolia: estimates, and a health-care needs assessment, from a cross-sectional population-based study","authors":"Otgonbayar Luvsannorov, Byambasuren Tsenddorj, Dorjkhand Baldorj, Selenge Enkhtuya, Delgermaa Purev, Andreas Husøy, Timothy J. Steiner","doi":"10.1186/s10194-024-01856-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Having previously shown headache disorders to be prevalent in Mongolia, here we elaborate on headache as a public-health concern in this country, reporting symptom burden and headache-attributed impaired participation at individual and societal levels, and conducting a health-care needs assessment. The study followed the standardized methodology developed by the Global Campaign against Headache, generating a representative general-population sample through multi-level randomized cluster sampling. Participants aged 18–65 years were interviewed at unannounced household visits by interviewers administering the HARDSHIP questionnaire. Symptom burden was established through questions on frequency, duration and intensity of headache, with proportion of time in ictal state calculated from frequency and duration. Individual impaired participation was established through the HALT questionnaire, enquiring into lost time from paid and household work and from leisure activities. Symptom burden and impaired participation yesterday were also assessed in those reporting headache yesterday. Population-level estimates were derived by factoring in prevalence. The total sample included 2,043 participants. Those reporting any headache in the last year (n = 1,351) spent, on average, 9.7% of all their time with headache, losing 1.3 workdays and 2.4 household days/3 months. These losses were considerably higher among those with probable medication-overuse headache (37.5%, 3.5 workdays, 6.7 household days) or other headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+) (21.9%, 2.4 workdays, 5.1 household days). At population-level (including those with and without headache), 6.2–7.4% of all time was spent with headache, 3.1% with H15+; 0.8 workdays and 1.4 household days/person/3 months were lost to headache, 0.3 workdays and 0.6 household days to migraine (the biggest contributor of all headache types). Our needs assessment estimated that one third (33.2%) of the adult population of Mongolia have headache (mostly migraine or H15+) likely to benefit from health care. This first population-based study on headache burden in Mongolia shows high levels of individual and societal burden, with H15 + the cause of greater burden at population level than migraine and TTH combined. Migraine, however, has the biggest impact on the nation’s productivity. From a purely economic perspective, Mongolia, with limited health resources, would probably be best served by focusing on mitigating migraine-attributed burden.","PeriodicalId":501630,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Headache and Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-024-01856-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Having previously shown headache disorders to be prevalent in Mongolia, here we elaborate on headache as a public-health concern in this country, reporting symptom burden and headache-attributed impaired participation at individual and societal levels, and conducting a health-care needs assessment. The study followed the standardized methodology developed by the Global Campaign against Headache, generating a representative general-population sample through multi-level randomized cluster sampling. Participants aged 18–65 years were interviewed at unannounced household visits by interviewers administering the HARDSHIP questionnaire. Symptom burden was established through questions on frequency, duration and intensity of headache, with proportion of time in ictal state calculated from frequency and duration. Individual impaired participation was established through the HALT questionnaire, enquiring into lost time from paid and household work and from leisure activities. Symptom burden and impaired participation yesterday were also assessed in those reporting headache yesterday. Population-level estimates were derived by factoring in prevalence. The total sample included 2,043 participants. Those reporting any headache in the last year (n = 1,351) spent, on average, 9.7% of all their time with headache, losing 1.3 workdays and 2.4 household days/3 months. These losses were considerably higher among those with probable medication-overuse headache (37.5%, 3.5 workdays, 6.7 household days) or other headache on ≥ 15 days/month (H15+) (21.9%, 2.4 workdays, 5.1 household days). At population-level (including those with and without headache), 6.2–7.4% of all time was spent with headache, 3.1% with H15+; 0.8 workdays and 1.4 household days/person/3 months were lost to headache, 0.3 workdays and 0.6 household days to migraine (the biggest contributor of all headache types). Our needs assessment estimated that one third (33.2%) of the adult population of Mongolia have headache (mostly migraine or H15+) likely to benefit from health care. This first population-based study on headache burden in Mongolia shows high levels of individual and societal burden, with H15 + the cause of greater burden at population level than migraine and TTH combined. Migraine, however, has the biggest impact on the nation’s productivity. From a purely economic perspective, Mongolia, with limited health resources, would probably be best served by focusing on mitigating migraine-attributed burden.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
蒙古成年人口中头痛疾病的负担:一项基于人口的横断面研究的估计值和医疗保健需求评估
此前的研究表明,头痛疾病在蒙古很普遍,在此我们将头痛作为该国的一个公共卫生问题进行详细阐述,报告个人和社会层面的症状负担和头痛导致的参与障碍,并进行医疗保健需求评估。这项研究采用了全球防治头痛运动制定的标准化方法,通过多层次随机分组抽样产生了具有代表性的普通人群样本。年龄在 18-65 岁之间的参与者在突击家访中接受访谈,由访谈员发放 HARDSHIP 问卷。通过询问头痛的频率、持续时间和强度来确定症状负担,并根据频率和持续时间计算处于发作状态的时间比例。个人参与受损情况通过 HALT 问卷确定,该问卷调查有偿工作、家务劳动和休闲活动所损失的时间。对昨天报告头痛的患者的症状负担和参与受损情况也进行了评估。通过计算患病率得出了人群水平的估计值。总样本包括 2,043 名参与者。在过去一年中报告过头痛的参与者(n = 1,351)平均有 9.7% 的时间用于头痛,损失了 1.3 个工作日和 2.4 个家庭日/3 个月。在可能有药物滥用性头痛(37.5%,3.5 个工作日,6.7 个家庭日)或其他头痛超过 15 天/月(H15+)(21.9%,2.4 个工作日,5.1 个家庭日)的人群中,这些损失要高得多。在人口层面(包括有头痛和无头痛的人群),6.2%-7.4%的时间用于头痛,3.1%用于H15+;0.8个工作日和1.4个家庭日/人/3个月损失于头痛,0.3个工作日和0.6个家庭日损失于偏头痛(所有头痛类型中损失最大的)。据我们的需求评估估计,蒙古有三分之一(33.2%)的成年人患有头痛(主要是偏头痛或H15+),可能会从医疗保健中受益。这项首次以人口为基础的蒙古头痛负担研究表明,个人和社会的头痛负担都很重,H15+造成的人口负担比偏头痛和全头痛的总和还要大。然而,偏头痛对国家生产力的影响最大。从纯粹的经济角度来看,蒙古的卫生资源有限,最好的办法可能是集中精力减轻偏头痛造成的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in new daily persistent headache patients: a single arm open label study Involvement of the cerebellum in structural connectivity enhancement in episodic migraine Concordance between venous sinus pressure and intracranial pressure in patients investigated for idiopathic intracranial hypertension Oxytocin shortens spreading depolarization-induced periorbital allodynia Influence of next-generation artificial intelligence on headache research, diagnosis and treatment: the junior editorial board members’ vision – part 1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1