Financial instruments with characteristics of equity: outcomes and value relevance

IF 3.3 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1108/jfra-01-2024-0044
Eduardo Flores, Marco Fasan
{"title":"Financial instruments with characteristics of equity: outcomes and value relevance","authors":"Eduardo Flores, Marco Fasan","doi":"10.1108/jfra-01-2024-0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the motivations behind the issuance of financial instruments with characteristics of equity (FICE), economic consequences associated with their issuance and accounting classifications based on a value-relevance approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a sample of 169 financial and nonfinancial firms from 10 jurisdictions that adopted International Financial Reporting Standards, the authors use a difference-in-differences econometric approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reveal that FICE issuers are more leveraged companies with higher costs of equity and, in some cases, lower effective tax rates. This evidence corroborates the hypothesis that issuers of FICEs seek to increase their book values of equity (accounting treatment as equity) and, simultaneously, generate deductible expenses for tax purposes (tax treatment as liability).</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This finding suggests that market participants do not treat these instruments as regular equity but rather as quasi-equity. The findings suggest that a binary classification of FICE as debt or equity may not be the accounting treatment that best represents the underlying economic substance of these contracts. Furthermore, this study reinforces the IASB indication regarding to increase the FICE disclosure to allow stakeholders to better understand the economic essence of these bonds.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study assesses the economic outcomes and market evaluation of a specific type of FICE that has not been previously studied, which is similar to the examples provided by the IASB in their materials on the subject.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":15826,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfra-01-2024-0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the motivations behind the issuance of financial instruments with characteristics of equity (FICE), economic consequences associated with their issuance and accounting classifications based on a value-relevance approach.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a sample of 169 financial and nonfinancial firms from 10 jurisdictions that adopted International Financial Reporting Standards, the authors use a difference-in-differences econometric approach.

Findings

The findings reveal that FICE issuers are more leveraged companies with higher costs of equity and, in some cases, lower effective tax rates. This evidence corroborates the hypothesis that issuers of FICEs seek to increase their book values of equity (accounting treatment as equity) and, simultaneously, generate deductible expenses for tax purposes (tax treatment as liability).

Practical implications

This finding suggests that market participants do not treat these instruments as regular equity but rather as quasi-equity. The findings suggest that a binary classification of FICE as debt or equity may not be the accounting treatment that best represents the underlying economic substance of these contracts. Furthermore, this study reinforces the IASB indication regarding to increase the FICE disclosure to allow stakeholders to better understand the economic essence of these bonds.

Originality/value

This study assesses the economic outcomes and market evaluation of a specific type of FICE that has not been previously studied, which is similar to the examples provided by the IASB in their materials on the subject.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
具有股权特征的金融工具:结果和价值相关性
本研究旨在调查发行具有股权特征的金融工具(FICE)的动机、与发行这些金融工具相关的经济后果以及基于价值相关性方法的会计分类。研究结果研究结果显示,FICE 发行人是杠杆率更高的公司,股权成本更高,在某些情况下,实际税率更低。这一证据证实了这样一个假设,即金融租赁公司的发行人试图增加其权益的账面价值(会计处理为权益),同时产生可抵扣的税务支出(税务处理为负债)。研究结果表明,将 FICE 二元分类为债务或股权可能不是最能体现这些合同基本经济实质的会计处理方法。此外,本研究还加强了国际会计准则理事会关于增加 FICE 披露的指示,以便利益相关者更好地了解这些债券的经济实质。原创性/价值本研究评估了一种特定类型的 FICE 的经济结果和市场评价,这种类型的 FICE 以前未曾研究过,这与国际会计准则理事会在其相关材料中提供的例子相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
16.00%
发文量
65
期刊最新文献
Does financial statement comparability reduce cost of equity? Evidence in emerging market Navigating uncertainty: the role of auditor demographics in key audit matters reporting amid COVID-19 in Egypt The impact of board diversity on earnings management in Kuwait The development of the European Union auditing research over the past decade: a systematic literature review and future research opportunities Risk disclosure, earnings smoothing and firm perceived risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1