Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Obesity: A Meta‐Analysis

Tanner J. Diemer, Douglas P. Nanu, Shaun A. Nguyen, Badr Ibrahim, Ted A. Meyer, Mohamed Abdelwahab
{"title":"Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients With Obesity: A Meta‐Analysis","authors":"Tanner J. Diemer, Douglas P. Nanu, Shaun A. Nguyen, Badr Ibrahim, Ted A. Meyer, Mohamed Abdelwahab","doi":"10.1002/lary.31751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo systematically review polysomnographic and cephalometric data in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) treated with maxillomandibular advancement (MMA).Data SourcesScopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and The COCHRANE Library.Review MethodsA search was performed from inception until April 3, 2024, in each database.ResultsA total of 14 studies (143 subjects) were included. The mean age was 44.3 years (range: 17–69), 80.2% males (95% CI: 72.5–86.5), mean BMI of 35.3 (95% CI: 33.1–37.5), and mean duration to follow‐up post‐MMA was 13.7 months (95% CI: 10.1–17.3). All objective outcomes improved significantly; overall, apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI) decreased by −57.3 ([95% CI: −71.5 to −43.2], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001) lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) increased by 14.1% ([95% CI: 9.9 to 18.3], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) decreased by −9.4 ([95% CI: −13.5 to −5.2], <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.0001). Surgical cure was 39.2% (95% CI: 20.3–60.0), and surgical success was 85.6% (95% CI: 77.8–91.5). Comparing percent reduction in class 3 obesity (−92.9%) as compared to class 1 (−85.5%) and class 2 (−83.6%) exhibited a significant difference (1 vs 3 <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.0012, 2 vs 3 <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.015).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MMA significantly improves subjective and objective outcomes in OSA amongst patients with obesity with results comparable to the overall population. Success rates remained above 80% in studies with the highest mean BMI. In addition, patients with class 3 obesity yielded a significantly increased benefit based on percent reduction in AHI compared with class 1 and 2.Level of Evidence1 <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024","PeriodicalId":501696,"journal":{"name":"The Laryngoscope","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo systematically review polysomnographic and cephalometric data in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥30 kg/m2) treated with maxillomandibular advancement (MMA).Data SourcesScopus, PubMed, CINAHL, and The COCHRANE Library.Review MethodsA search was performed from inception until April 3, 2024, in each database.ResultsA total of 14 studies (143 subjects) were included. The mean age was 44.3 years (range: 17–69), 80.2% males (95% CI: 72.5–86.5), mean BMI of 35.3 (95% CI: 33.1–37.5), and mean duration to follow‐up post‐MMA was 13.7 months (95% CI: 10.1–17.3). All objective outcomes improved significantly; overall, apnea‐hypopnea index (AHI) decreased by −57.3 ([95% CI: −71.5 to −43.2], p < 0.0001) lowest oxygen saturation (LSAT) increased by 14.1% ([95% CI: 9.9 to 18.3], p < 0.0001), and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) decreased by −9.4 ([95% CI: −13.5 to −5.2], p < 0.0001). Surgical cure was 39.2% (95% CI: 20.3–60.0), and surgical success was 85.6% (95% CI: 77.8–91.5). Comparing percent reduction in class 3 obesity (−92.9%) as compared to class 1 (−85.5%) and class 2 (−83.6%) exhibited a significant difference (1 vs 3 p = 0.0012, 2 vs 3 p = 0.015).ConclusionsOur findings suggest that MMA significantly improves subjective and objective outcomes in OSA amongst patients with obesity with results comparable to the overall population. Success rates remained above 80% in studies with the highest mean BMI. In addition, patients with class 3 obesity yielded a significantly increased benefit based on percent reduction in AHI compared with class 1 and 2.Level of Evidence1 Laryngoscope, 2024
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
上颌前突治疗肥胖症患者的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停:元分析
目的系统回顾肥胖(体重指数[BMI]≥30 kg/m2)阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者接受上颌下颌前突矫正术(MMA)治疗后的多导睡眠图和头颅测量数据.数据来源Scopus、PubMed、CINAHL和The COCHRANE Library.回顾方法在各数据库中进行从开始到2024年4月3日的检索.结果共纳入14项研究(143名受试者)。平均年龄为 44.3 岁(范围:17-69),80.2% 为男性(95% CI:72.5-86.5),平均体重指数为 35.3(95% CI:33.1-37.5),MMA 后平均随访时间为 13.7 个月(95% CI:10.1-17.3)。所有客观结果均有明显改善;总体而言,呼吸暂停-低通气指数(AHI)降低了-57.3([95% CI: -71.5 to -43.2],p < 0.0001)最低血氧饱和度(LSAT)增加了 14.1%([95% CI:9.9 至 18.3],p < 0.0001),埃普沃思嗜睡量表(ESS)减少了 -9.4([95% CI:-13.5 至 -5.2],p < 0.0001)。手术治愈率为 39.2%(95% CI:20.3-60.0),手术成功率为 85.6%(95% CI:77.8-91.5)。比较 3 级肥胖(-92.9%)与 1 级(-85.5%)和 2 级(-83.6%)的减少百分比,显示出显著差异(1 vs 3 p = 0.0012,2 vs 3 p = 0.015)。结论我们的研究结果表明,MMA 能显著改善肥胖患者 OSA 的主观和客观疗效,其效果与总体人群相当。在平均体重指数(BMI)最高的研究中,成功率保持在 80% 以上。此外,与 1 级和 2 级肥胖症患者相比,3 级肥胖症患者在 AHI 降低百分比方面的获益明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi-subgroup Meta-analysis. JAK-inhibitor Tofacitinib in Severe Laryngeal Sarcoidosis: A Case Report. The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach Impact of Biologics on Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps and Allergic Fungal Sinusitis High‐Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1