Factors Associated With Improvement Following In‐office Steroid Injections for Vocal Fold Scar

Naomi Tesema, Taylor G. Lackey, Mackenzie O'Connor, Paul E. Kwak, Aaron M. Johnson, Milan R. Amin
{"title":"Factors Associated With Improvement Following In‐office Steroid Injections for Vocal Fold Scar","authors":"Naomi Tesema, Taylor G. Lackey, Mackenzie O'Connor, Paul E. Kwak, Aaron M. Johnson, Milan R. Amin","doi":"10.1002/lary.31734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients receiving in‐office vocal fold steroid injections (VFSI), highlighting relatively new measures around vocal pitch.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of vocal fold scar who received in‐office VFSI from 2013 to 2024 were evaluated. Pre‐ and post‐steroid Voice Handicap Index (VHI‐10) scores, stroboscopic vibratory parameters, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and fundamental frequency coefficient of variation (F0CoV) during sustained phonation were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests and McNemar's tests.ResultsTwenty‐two patients had follow‐up data 1–3 months after steroid injection. The median decrease in VHI‐10 after one injection was 4 points (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02). We found no difference in CPP and F0CoV measures at follow‐up. Forty‐five percent of patients improved in mucosal wave and amplitude of at least one vocal fold. Earlier presentation from vocal injury was associated with improvement in mucosal wave and amplitude of the left vocal fold (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.03). We found no difference in sex, tobacco smoking history, singing status, secondary diagnosis, and baseline VHI‐10 score between patients who improved in vibratory parameters and those who did not.ConclusionThis single‐center study is one of the largest exploring patient outcomes following in‐office VFSI. Though patients reported modest improvement in voice use after VFSI, this may not be as impactful as previously believed. Improvement in videostroboscopy is expected in about half of the patients, with recency from vocal injury a likely predictor of success. These partially negative results provide insight into counseling patients regarding benefits from in‐office VFSI.Level of Evidence4 <jats:italic>Laryngoscope</jats:italic>, 2024","PeriodicalId":501696,"journal":{"name":"The Laryngoscope","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Laryngoscope","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.31734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients receiving in‐office vocal fold steroid injections (VFSI), highlighting relatively new measures around vocal pitch.MethodsPatients with a diagnosis of vocal fold scar who received in‐office VFSI from 2013 to 2024 were evaluated. Pre‐ and post‐steroid Voice Handicap Index (VHI‐10) scores, stroboscopic vibratory parameters, acoustic measures of cepstral peak prominence (CPP), and fundamental frequency coefficient of variation (F0CoV) during sustained phonation were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests and McNemar's tests.ResultsTwenty‐two patients had follow‐up data 1–3 months after steroid injection. The median decrease in VHI‐10 after one injection was 4 points (p = 0.02). We found no difference in CPP and F0CoV measures at follow‐up. Forty‐five percent of patients improved in mucosal wave and amplitude of at least one vocal fold. Earlier presentation from vocal injury was associated with improvement in mucosal wave and amplitude of the left vocal fold (p = 0.03). We found no difference in sex, tobacco smoking history, singing status, secondary diagnosis, and baseline VHI‐10 score between patients who improved in vibratory parameters and those who did not.ConclusionThis single‐center study is one of the largest exploring patient outcomes following in‐office VFSI. Though patients reported modest improvement in voice use after VFSI, this may not be as impactful as previously believed. Improvement in videostroboscopy is expected in about half of the patients, with recency from vocal injury a likely predictor of success. These partially negative results provide insight into counseling patients regarding benefits from in‐office VFSI.Level of Evidence4 Laryngoscope, 2024
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
声带褶皱疤痕在诊室注射类固醇后病情好转的相关因素
本研究旨在评估接受诊室声带类固醇注射(VFSI)的患者的临床疗效,重点关注围绕声带音高的相对较新的测量方法。方法对 2013 年至 2024 年期间接受诊室声带类固醇注射的声带瘢痕患者进行评估。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和 McNemar 检验分析了类固醇注射前后的嗓音障碍指数(VHI-10)评分、频闪振动参数、持续发音时的声学测量栉峰突出度(CPP)和基频变异系数(F0CoV)。注射一次后,VHI-10 的中位数下降了 4 点(p = 0.02)。我们发现随访时的 CPP 和 F0CoV 测量结果没有差异。45%的患者至少一个声带的粘膜波和振幅有所改善。较早出现声带损伤与左侧声带粘膜波和振幅的改善有关(p = 0.03)。我们发现,振动参数改善的患者与未改善的患者在性别、吸烟史、歌唱状况、辅助诊断和基线 VHI-10 评分方面没有差异。尽管患者报告称 VFSI 后嗓音使用情况略有改善,但其影响可能并不像之前认为的那样大。预计约有一半的患者会在视频旋转镜检查中得到改善,而声带损伤的复发时间可能是成功的预测因素。这些部分负面的结果为就诊室内 VFSI 的益处向患者提供咨询提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tonsillectomy Versus Tonsillotomy in Pediatric Sleep-Disordered Breathing: A Systematic Review and Multi-subgroup Meta-analysis. JAK-inhibitor Tofacitinib in Severe Laryngeal Sarcoidosis: A Case Report. The Use of Water Sac Dilation in Resecting Parapharyngeal Space Benign Tumor via Transoral Approach Impact of Biologics on Surgery in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Polyps and Allergic Fungal Sinusitis High‐Riding Innominate Artery: Booby Trap for ICU Tracheotomy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1