A new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity: fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve

IF 1.8 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Frontiers of Earth Science Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s11707-024-1100-7
Junjian Zhang, Anan Xu, Chengjin Zhao, Wei Wang, Youlu Jiang, Veerle Vandeginste, Zhengbao Xue, Yuqiang Guo, Heyao Miao
{"title":"A new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity: fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve","authors":"Junjian Zhang, Anan Xu, Chengjin Zhao, Wei Wang, Youlu Jiang, Veerle Vandeginste, Zhengbao Xue, Yuqiang Guo, Heyao Miao","doi":"10.1007/s11707-024-1100-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Pressure mercury intrusion test is (MIP) one of the most commonly used methods to characterize pore-fracture structure. Here, we use the fractal dimension of the mercury intrusion curve to analyze the heterogeneity of pore and fracture distribution. Differing from the intrusive mercury curve, the extrusive curve provides a better representation of the seepage capacity of a reservoir. In this paper, the division method of sample types using both mercury invasive parameters (pore volume, pore volume percentage, porosity, permeability) and extrusive parameters (mercury removal efficiency) is discussed. The fractal dimension values of mercury intrusive and extrusive curves are calculated for all samples using the Menger, Thermodynamics, and Multifractal fractal models. Moreover, the fractal significance of the mercury withdrawal curve is examined. The results are as follows. 1) The samples can be divided into three types based on the mercury removal efficiency and total pore volume. Type A is characterized by lower total pore volume (&lt; 0.08 cm<sup>3</sup>·g<sup>−1</sup>) and removal efficiency (&lt; 30%), type B has lower total pore volume (&lt; 0.08 cm<sup>3</sup>·g<sup>−1</sup>) and higher removal efficiency (&gt; 30%), and type C has larger total pore volume (&gt; 0.08 cm<sup>3</sup>·g<sup>−1</sup>) and higher removal efficiency(&gt; 30%). 2) Mercury removal efficiency does not correlate with the mineral composition or total pore volume, but it does show a clear positive correlation with pore volume in the range of 100 to 1000 nm. Unlike the Menger model, the mercury removal curve analyzed using the thermodynamics and multifractal model shows good fractal characteristics. 3) In contrast to the injective curves, the fractal dimension of mercury removal curves exhibits an obvious linear negative correlation with pore structure parameters and mercury removal efficiency. Moreover, the multifractal dimensions <i>D</i><sub>0</sub>–<i>D</i><sub>10</sub> obtained from the mercury removal curves show a negative correlation with porosity and permeability. This indicates that fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve can be used as a new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48927,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Earth Science","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-024-1100-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pressure mercury intrusion test is (MIP) one of the most commonly used methods to characterize pore-fracture structure. Here, we use the fractal dimension of the mercury intrusion curve to analyze the heterogeneity of pore and fracture distribution. Differing from the intrusive mercury curve, the extrusive curve provides a better representation of the seepage capacity of a reservoir. In this paper, the division method of sample types using both mercury invasive parameters (pore volume, pore volume percentage, porosity, permeability) and extrusive parameters (mercury removal efficiency) is discussed. The fractal dimension values of mercury intrusive and extrusive curves are calculated for all samples using the Menger, Thermodynamics, and Multifractal fractal models. Moreover, the fractal significance of the mercury withdrawal curve is examined. The results are as follows. 1) The samples can be divided into three types based on the mercury removal efficiency and total pore volume. Type A is characterized by lower total pore volume (< 0.08 cm3·g−1) and removal efficiency (< 30%), type B has lower total pore volume (< 0.08 cm3·g−1) and higher removal efficiency (> 30%), and type C has larger total pore volume (> 0.08 cm3·g−1) and higher removal efficiency(> 30%). 2) Mercury removal efficiency does not correlate with the mineral composition or total pore volume, but it does show a clear positive correlation with pore volume in the range of 100 to 1000 nm. Unlike the Menger model, the mercury removal curve analyzed using the thermodynamics and multifractal model shows good fractal characteristics. 3) In contrast to the injective curves, the fractal dimension of mercury removal curves exhibits an obvious linear negative correlation with pore structure parameters and mercury removal efficiency. Moreover, the multifractal dimensions D0D10 obtained from the mercury removal curves show a negative correlation with porosity and permeability. This indicates that fractal dimension based on the mercury extrusion curve can be used as a new parameter for characterizing pore-fracture structure heterogeneity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
表征孔隙-断裂结构异质性的新参数:基于汞挤压曲线的分形维度
压力汞侵入试验(MIP)是表征孔隙-断裂结构最常用的方法之一。在此,我们利用水银侵入曲线的分形维度来分析孔隙和断裂分布的异质性。与侵入汞曲线不同,挤出汞曲线能更好地反映储层的渗流能力。本文讨论了利用汞侵入参数(孔隙体积、孔隙体积百分比、孔隙度、渗透率)和汞外渗参数(汞去除效率)划分样品类型的方法。利用门格尔分形模型、热力学分形模型和多分形分形模型计算了所有样品的汞侵入曲线和汞外侵曲线的分形维度值。此外,还研究了汞退出曲线的分形意义。结果如下1) 根据汞去除效率和总孔隙度,样品可分为三种类型。A 型的特点是总孔隙体积(< 0.08 cm3-g-1)较小,汞去除率(< 30%)较低;B 型的特点是总孔隙体积(< 0.08 cm3-g-1)较小,汞去除率(> 30%)较高;C 型的特点是总孔隙体积(> 0.08 cm3-g-1)较大,汞去除率(> 30%)较高。2) 汞的去除效率与矿物成分和总孔隙体积无关,但在 100 至 1000 nm 范围内,汞的去除效率与孔隙体积呈明显的正相关。与门格尔模型不同,使用热力学和多分形模型分析的汞去除曲线显示出良好的分形特征。3) 与注入曲线相反,汞去除曲线的分形维数与孔隙结构参数和汞去除效率呈明显的线性负相关。此外,从汞去除曲线得到的多分形维数 D0-D10 与孔隙度和渗透率呈负相关。这表明,基于汞挤出曲线的分形维度可作为表征孔隙-断裂结构异质性的新参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Earth Science
Frontiers of Earth Science GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
627
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Earth Science publishes original, peer-reviewed, theoretical and experimental frontier research papers as well as significant review articles of more general interest to earth scientists. The journal features articles dealing with observations, patterns, processes, and modeling of both innerspheres (including deep crust, mantle, and core) and outerspheres (including atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere) of the earth. Its aim is to promote communication and share knowledge among the international earth science communities
期刊最新文献
Case studies of hailstorms in Shandong Province using hail size discrimination algorithm based on dual Polarimetric parameters Experimental analysis of dust deposition and physical weathering intensity in the Gobi Desert Sedimentary architecture of a sandy braided river with seasonal hydrodynamic variations: insights from the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation, Ordos Basin, China Projected changes of runoff in the Upper Yellow River Basin under shared socioeconomic pathways Applying 3D geological modeling to predict favorable areas for coalbed methane accumulation: a case study in the Qinshui Basin
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1