Success Rate and Predicting Factors for Repeated High‐Dose Intradetrusor Dysport Injections in Children With Neurogenic Bladder: A Retrospective Study

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Neurourology and Urodynamics Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1002/nau.25580
Yossi Ventura, Roy Morag, Tal May, Dmitry Khunovitz, David Ben Meir
{"title":"Success Rate and Predicting Factors for Repeated High‐Dose Intradetrusor Dysport Injections in Children With Neurogenic Bladder: A Retrospective Study","authors":"Yossi Ventura, Roy Morag, Tal May, Dmitry Khunovitz, David Ben Meir","doi":"10.1002/nau.25580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesEvaluating the effectiveness and safety of repeated high‐dose intradetrusor abobotulinumtoxin A (Dysport®) injections for the treatment of pediatric neurogenic bladders refractory to medications.DesignRetrospective interventional study.ParticipantsThe cohort included 37 children (22 boys and 15 girls) of median age 9.2 years. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of neurogenic bladder and failure to respond to medical treatment. Exclusion criteria were augmented bladder, insufficient data, and interval of &gt; 11 months between video‐urodynamic study and Dysport injection.InterventionsAll participants were treated with an intra‐detrusor injection of Dysport 30 IU/kg (up to 1000 IU) under general anesthesia. Repeated (second and third) injections were scheduled (6–12 months) in patients who demonstrated an improvement in cystometric parameters. All participants underwent video urodynamic testing before onset of treatment and 4–5 months after subsequent injection.Main Outcome MeasuresSuccess of treatment was defined as a decrease in end filling pressure (EFP) to &lt; 40 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O and/or a 20% increase in maximal cystometric capacity (MCC). These parameters along with initial bladder features were evaluated for ability to predict treatment success.ResultsNo side effects of Dysport were observed or reported. The overall success rate was 62%. MCC increased by a median of 30% (IQR 200–300, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.001), 37% (IQR 197–310, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.001) and 45% (IQR 245–300, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.025) after the first, second and third injections, respectively. Median EFP decreased from 45 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O to 34 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O (IQR 20–45, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.029), 23 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O (IQR 20–37, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.004), and 20 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O (IQR 12–32, <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.049) after the first, second, and third injections, respectively. No predicting factor of success of treatment were found; However, three of five cases of “end stage” bladder showed improvement.ConclusionsHigh‐dose Dysport injection is safe and effective for the treatment of neurogenic bladder. Studies with larger cohort and a control group would further elucidate which bladders would benefit most. At present, we recommend treating also bladders with “end stage” features with botulinum toxin before considering augmentation.","PeriodicalId":19200,"journal":{"name":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurourology and Urodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.25580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesEvaluating the effectiveness and safety of repeated high‐dose intradetrusor abobotulinumtoxin A (Dysport®) injections for the treatment of pediatric neurogenic bladders refractory to medications.DesignRetrospective interventional study.ParticipantsThe cohort included 37 children (22 boys and 15 girls) of median age 9.2 years. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of neurogenic bladder and failure to respond to medical treatment. Exclusion criteria were augmented bladder, insufficient data, and interval of > 11 months between video‐urodynamic study and Dysport injection.InterventionsAll participants were treated with an intra‐detrusor injection of Dysport 30 IU/kg (up to 1000 IU) under general anesthesia. Repeated (second and third) injections were scheduled (6–12 months) in patients who demonstrated an improvement in cystometric parameters. All participants underwent video urodynamic testing before onset of treatment and 4–5 months after subsequent injection.Main Outcome MeasuresSuccess of treatment was defined as a decrease in end filling pressure (EFP) to < 40 cm H2O and/or a 20% increase in maximal cystometric capacity (MCC). These parameters along with initial bladder features were evaluated for ability to predict treatment success.ResultsNo side effects of Dysport were observed or reported. The overall success rate was 62%. MCC increased by a median of 30% (IQR 200–300, p < 0.001), 37% (IQR 197–310, p = 0.001) and 45% (IQR 245–300, p = 0.025) after the first, second and third injections, respectively. Median EFP decreased from 45 cm H2O to 34 cm H2O (IQR 20–45, p = 0.029), 23 cm H2O (IQR 20–37, p = 0.004), and 20 cm H2O (IQR 12–32, p = 0.049) after the first, second, and third injections, respectively. No predicting factor of success of treatment were found; However, three of five cases of “end stage” bladder showed improvement.ConclusionsHigh‐dose Dysport injection is safe and effective for the treatment of neurogenic bladder. Studies with larger cohort and a control group would further elucidate which bladders would benefit most. At present, we recommend treating also bladders with “end stage” features with botulinum toxin before considering augmentation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经源性膀胱患儿重复大剂量射入器内 Dysport 注射的成功率和预测因素:回顾性研究
目的评估重复高剂量尿道内注射阿博毒素 A (Dysport®) 治疗药物难治性小儿神经源性膀胱的有效性和安全性。纳入标准为诊断为神经源性膀胱且药物治疗无效。排除标准为膀胱增大、数据不充分、视频尿动力学研究与 Dysport 注射之间的时间间隔为 11 个月。干预措施所有参与者都在全身麻醉的情况下接受了 30 IU/kg(最多 1000 IU)的 Dysport 治疗。如果患者的膀胱测量参数有所改善,则安排重复注射(第二次和第三次)(6-12 个月)。主要结果指标治疗成功的定义是充盈末压(EFP)降至 40 cm H2O 和/或最大膀胱容量(MCC)增加 20%。对这些参数以及初始膀胱特征进行了评估,以确定预测治疗成功的能力。结果未发现或报告 Dysport 的副作用。总体成功率为 62%。第一次、第二次和第三次注射后,MCC 的中位数分别增加了 30%(IQR 200-300,p = 0.001)、37%(IQR 197-310,p = 0.001)和 45%(IQR 245-300,p = 0.025)。第一次、第二次和第三次注射后,EFP 中位数分别从 45 cm H2O 降至 34 cm H2O(IQR 20-45,p = 0.029)、23 cm H2O(IQR 20-37,p = 0.004)和 20 cm H2O(IQR 12-32,p = 0.049)。结论大剂量 Dysport 注射治疗神经源性膀胱安全有效。大剂量 Dysport 注射治疗神经源性膀胱是安全有效的。目前,我们建议先用肉毒杆菌毒素治疗具有 "终末期 "特征的膀胱,然后再考虑膀胱增容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurourology and Urodynamics
Neurourology and Urodynamics 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
231
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurourology and Urodynamics welcomes original scientific contributions from all parts of the world on topics related to urinary tract function, urinary and fecal continence and pelvic floor function.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Antibiotic Choice at the Time of Sacral Neuromodulation Implantation on Rates of Surgical Site Infection. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Autologous Mid-Urethral Fascia Slings and Retropubic Mid-Urethral Slings for Women Undergoing a Primary Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Development and Testing of the Spinal Cord Injury Bladder and Bowel Control Questionnaire (SCI-BBC-Q). Growing Up With Neurogenic Bladder: Navigating the Challenges and Controversies in Pediatric to Adult Transition and Lifelong Care: A Report From the Neurogenic Bladder Research Group (NBRG). Preventive Effects of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Treatment on Urinary Bladder and Kidney Damage in Spinal Cord Injured Rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1