Outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice

Tetsushi Azami, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Jun Noda, Masataka Yamawaki, Fumitaka Niiya, Naotaka Maruoka, Fumiya Nishimoto, Akira Ishihara, Masatsugu Nagahama
{"title":"Outcomes of percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage versus percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for obstructive jaundice","authors":"Tetsushi Azami, Yuichi Takano, Naoki Tamai, Jun Noda, Masataka Yamawaki, Fumitaka Niiya, Naotaka Maruoka, Fumiya Nishimoto, Akira Ishihara, Masatsugu Nagahama","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.03.24313028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for cases of obstructive jaundice in which the bile duct obstruction is below the confluence of the cystic ducts. The present study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of PTGBD and PTBD in patients with obstructive jaundice. This study enrolled patients who had undergone percutaneous biliary drainage for acute cholangitis and obstructive jaundice at two institutions between January 2017 and March 2024. Fifty-five patients were included in this analysis. However, patients with intrahepatic or hilar bile duct stenosis, post choledocholithiasis, complex cholecystitis, total bilirubin levels < 2.0 mg/dL, and uncorrectable bleeding tendency and those who had undergone the procedure and later discontinued without puncture were excluded. The technical success rates, clinical success rates, and complication rates of the procedure were evaluated. The technical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) in the PTGBD group and 82.1% (13/28) in the PTBD group. The clinical success rates were 85.2% (23/27) in the PTGBD group and 67.9% (19/28) in the PTBD group. The complication rates were 11.1% (3/27) in the PTGBD group and 17.9% (5/28) in the PTBD group. Hence, the two groups did not significantly differ in any of the endpoints. The outcomes of PTGBD were comparable to those of PTBD in patients with obstructive jaundice. Hence, PTGBD is a reasonable treatment option for cases of obstructive jaundice in which PTBD is not feasible.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.03.24313028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) is an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for cases of obstructive jaundice in which the bile duct obstruction is below the confluence of the cystic ducts. The present study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of PTGBD and PTBD in patients with obstructive jaundice. This study enrolled patients who had undergone percutaneous biliary drainage for acute cholangitis and obstructive jaundice at two institutions between January 2017 and March 2024. Fifty-five patients were included in this analysis. However, patients with intrahepatic or hilar bile duct stenosis, post choledocholithiasis, complex cholecystitis, total bilirubin levels < 2.0 mg/dL, and uncorrectable bleeding tendency and those who had undergone the procedure and later discontinued without puncture were excluded. The technical success rates, clinical success rates, and complication rates of the procedure were evaluated. The technical success rates were 96.3% (26/27) in the PTGBD group and 82.1% (13/28) in the PTBD group. The clinical success rates were 85.2% (23/27) in the PTGBD group and 67.9% (19/28) in the PTBD group. The complication rates were 11.1% (3/27) in the PTGBD group and 17.9% (5/28) in the PTBD group. Hence, the two groups did not significantly differ in any of the endpoints. The outcomes of PTGBD were comparable to those of PTBD in patients with obstructive jaundice. Hence, PTGBD is a reasonable treatment option for cases of obstructive jaundice in which PTBD is not feasible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经皮经肝胆囊引流术与经皮经肝胆道引流术治疗梗阻性黄疸的疗效比较
经皮经肝胆囊引流术(PTGBD)是经皮经肝胆管引流术(PTBD)的替代方法,适用于胆管阻塞在胆囊管汇合处以下的梗阻性黄疸病例。本研究旨在评估 PTGBD 和 PTBD 对梗阻性黄疸患者的作用。本研究招募了2017年1月至2024年3月期间在两家机构接受经皮胆道引流术治疗急性胆管炎和梗阻性黄疸的患者。55名患者被纳入本次分析。但是,排除了肝内或肝门胆管狭窄、胆总管结石术后、复杂性胆囊炎、总胆红素水平< 2.0 mg/dL、有无法纠正的出血倾向的患者,以及接受手术后未经穿刺而中止手术的患者。对手术的技术成功率、临床成功率和并发症发生率进行了评估。PTGBD 组的技术成功率为 96.3%(26/27),PTBD 组为 82.1%(13/28)。PTGBD组的临床成功率为85.2%(23/27),PTBD组为67.9%(19/28)。PTGBD 组的并发症发生率为 11.1%(3/27),PTBD 组为 17.9%(5/28)。因此,两组在任何终点上都没有明显差异。在阻塞性黄疸患者中,PTGBD 的疗效与 PTBD 相当。因此,对于阻塞性黄疸而又无法进行局部黄疸切开术的病例,局部黄疸分流术是一种合理的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiome shifts in adolescents after sleeve gastrectomy with increased oral-associated taxa and pro-inflammatory potential Development of a machine-learning model for therapeutic efficacy prediction of preoperative treatment for esophageal cancer using single nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes Why Symptoms Linger in Quiescent Crohn's Disease: Investigating the Impact of Sulfidogenic Microbes and Sulfur Metabolic Pathways Evidence that extracellular HSPB1 contributes to inflammation in alcohol-associated hepatitis Large language models outperform traditional natural language processing methods in extracting patient-reported outcomes in IBD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1