Efficacy and safety of 10-day versus 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Najam Gohar, Zoya Ejaz, Faizan Ahmed, Abdul Rafay, Abdullah Humayun, Momna Nisar, Ali Mushtaq, Aanusha Ghouri, Fatima Zafar, Hira Khalid, Sania Afzal, Muhammad Hammad Khan, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Muhammad Shahzil, Essam Rashad, Rehmat Ullah Awan, Prasun K Jalal
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of 10-day versus 14-day bismuth-containing quadruple therapy for H. pylori eradication: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Najam Gohar, Zoya Ejaz, Faizan Ahmed, Abdul Rafay, Abdullah Humayun, Momna Nisar, Ali Mushtaq, Aanusha Ghouri, Fatima Zafar, Hira Khalid, Sania Afzal, Muhammad Hammad Khan, Huzaifa Ahmad Cheema, Muhammad Shahzil, Essam Rashad, Rehmat Ullah Awan, Prasun K Jalal","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.18.24312061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nNearly half of the world population is infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) has shown favorable outcomes. This study compares 10-day and 14-day BQT regimens to evaluate their efficacy, safety, and compliance rates. Methods\nWe searched electronic databases from their inception until May 2024 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 10-day and 14-day BQT regimens for H. pylori eradication. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Dichotomous outcomes were compared using risk ratio (RR). Results\nSeven RCTs and a total of 2,424 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the intention-to-treat eradication rate (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94, 1.01) and the per-protocol eradication rate (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93, 1.00) between the 10-day BQT and 14-day BQT groups. Commonly reported adverse events in both groups were epigastric pain and discomfort, nausea, and vomiting. There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the two groups (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63, 1.02). There was no significant difference in the compliance rate between the two groups (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04).\nConclusion The eradication rates, risk of adverse events, and compliance rates were comparable between the two groups. Future research comparing similar drug doses with larger sample sizes and longer patient follow-ups can improve the quality of results.","PeriodicalId":501258,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.18.24312061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Nearly half of the world population is infected by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) has shown favorable outcomes. This study compares 10-day and 14-day BQT regimens to evaluate their efficacy, safety, and compliance rates. Methods We searched electronic databases from their inception until May 2024 to retrieve all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared 10-day and 14-day BQT regimens for H. pylori eradication. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4. Dichotomous outcomes were compared using risk ratio (RR). Results Seven RCTs and a total of 2,424 patients were included in the meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the intention-to-treat eradication rate (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.94, 1.01) and the per-protocol eradication rate (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.93, 1.00) between the 10-day BQT and 14-day BQT groups. Commonly reported adverse events in both groups were epigastric pain and discomfort, nausea, and vomiting. There was no significant difference in the risk of adverse events between the two groups (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63, 1.02). There was no significant difference in the compliance rate between the two groups (RR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00, 1.04). Conclusion The eradication rates, risk of adverse events, and compliance rates were comparable between the two groups. Future research comparing similar drug doses with larger sample sizes and longer patient follow-ups can improve the quality of results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
10天与14天含铋四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的有效性和安全性:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景世界上近半数人口感染了幽门螺旋杆菌(H. pylori)。含铋四联疗法(BQT)显示出良好的疗效。本研究比较了 10 天和 14 天的 BQT 方案,以评估其疗效、安全性和依从率。方法我们检索了从开始到2024年5月的电子数据库,检索了所有比较10天和14天BQT根除幽门螺杆菌疗法的随机对照试验(RCT)。使用Review Manager 5.4进行了元分析。使用风险比 (RR) 对二分法结果进行比较。结果共有七项 RCT 和 2424 名患者被纳入荟萃分析。10 天 BQT 组和 14 天 BQT 组的意向治疗根除率(RR 0.97;95% CI 0.94,1.01)和按协议根除率(RR 0.96;95% CI 0.93,1.00)没有明显差异。两组常见的不良反应均为上腹痛和不适、恶心和呕吐。两组的不良事件风险无明显差异(RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.63, 1.02)。结论 两组的根除率、不良事件风险和依从率相当。未来的研究如果能通过更大的样本量和更长时间的患者随访来比较相似的药物剂量,就能提高研究结果的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Gut microbiome shifts in adolescents after sleeve gastrectomy with increased oral-associated taxa and pro-inflammatory potential Development of a machine-learning model for therapeutic efficacy prediction of preoperative treatment for esophageal cancer using single nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes Why Symptoms Linger in Quiescent Crohn's Disease: Investigating the Impact of Sulfidogenic Microbes and Sulfur Metabolic Pathways Evidence that extracellular HSPB1 contributes to inflammation in alcohol-associated hepatitis Large language models outperform traditional natural language processing methods in extracting patient-reported outcomes in IBD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1