Soil carbon sequestration in rangelands: a critical review of the impacts of major management strategies

IF 1.2 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY Rangeland Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1071/rj24005
Beverley Henry, Diane Allen, Warwick Badgery, Steven Bray, John Carter, Ram C. Dalal, Wayne Hall, Matthew Tom Harrison, Sarah E. McDonald, Hayley McMillan
{"title":"Soil carbon sequestration in rangelands: a critical review of the impacts of major management strategies","authors":"Beverley Henry, Diane Allen, Warwick Badgery, Steven Bray, John Carter, Ram C. Dalal, Wayne Hall, Matthew Tom Harrison, Sarah E. McDonald, Hayley McMillan","doi":"10.1071/rj24005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The agronomic benefits of soil organic matter have been studied for centuries, but contemporary focus has expanded to ask how increasing long-term storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) can contribute to mitigation of climate change. Understanding the potential for SOC sequestration in the vast rangelands is crucial for climate change policy, agricultural land management and carbon market opportunities. In this review, we evaluate the evidence from published field trials and modelling studies for sequestration in Australian rangeland soils managed for livestock grazing. We found few long-term studies with high quality SOC stock change data linked to new management, and our analysis was constrained by data limitations, conflicting results between studies, and highly variable climate, soil and landscape conditions across production systems. Rainfall and soil properties are dominant determinants of variation in SOC stocks in rangelands, and it was difficult to detect management impacts in these environments. However, there was consistent evidence that: (1) Sowing more productive grasses or legumes in existing grass pastures generally increases SOC stocks; (2) Prolonged high stocking is associated with net SOC loss; (3) Destocking or exclusion of grazing results in small SOC increases, especially in degraded soils; (4) Conversion from cropping to permanent pasture results in sequestration, influenced by management history; (5) Rotational grazing strategies show negligible impact on SOC stocks relative to continuous grazing; and (6) Waterponding increased SOC stocks initially but persistence has not been demonstrated. We discuss possible opportunities for SOC sequestration in rangelands in the context of uncertainties and associated benefits and trade-offs for livestock production, and make recommendations to improve the evidence-base for major management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20810,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/rj24005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The agronomic benefits of soil organic matter have been studied for centuries, but contemporary focus has expanded to ask how increasing long-term storage of soil organic carbon (SOC) can contribute to mitigation of climate change. Understanding the potential for SOC sequestration in the vast rangelands is crucial for climate change policy, agricultural land management and carbon market opportunities. In this review, we evaluate the evidence from published field trials and modelling studies for sequestration in Australian rangeland soils managed for livestock grazing. We found few long-term studies with high quality SOC stock change data linked to new management, and our analysis was constrained by data limitations, conflicting results between studies, and highly variable climate, soil and landscape conditions across production systems. Rainfall and soil properties are dominant determinants of variation in SOC stocks in rangelands, and it was difficult to detect management impacts in these environments. However, there was consistent evidence that: (1) Sowing more productive grasses or legumes in existing grass pastures generally increases SOC stocks; (2) Prolonged high stocking is associated with net SOC loss; (3) Destocking or exclusion of grazing results in small SOC increases, especially in degraded soils; (4) Conversion from cropping to permanent pasture results in sequestration, influenced by management history; (5) Rotational grazing strategies show negligible impact on SOC stocks relative to continuous grazing; and (6) Waterponding increased SOC stocks initially but persistence has not been demonstrated. We discuss possible opportunities for SOC sequestration in rangelands in the context of uncertainties and associated benefits and trade-offs for livestock production, and make recommendations to improve the evidence-base for major management strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
牧场土壤固碳:主要管理战略影响的批判性审查
几个世纪以来,人们一直在研究土壤有机质对农艺的益处,但当代的研究重点已扩展到如何增加土壤有机碳(SOC)的长期储存来减缓气候变化。了解广袤牧场中土壤有机碳固存的潜力对于气候变化政策、农业土地管理和碳市场机会至关重要。在本综述中,我们评估了已发表的关于澳大利亚牧场土壤固碳的实地试验和建模研究的证据。我们发现,很少有长期研究能提供与新管理相关联的高质量 SOC 储量变化数据,而且我们的分析受到数据限制、研究结果相互矛盾以及不同生产系统的气候、土壤和地貌条件千差万别等因素的制约。降雨量和土壤特性是牧场中 SOC 储量变化的主要决定因素,因此很难发现管理对这些环境的影响。不过,有一致的证据表明(1) 在现有草场上播种产量更高的禾本科或豆科植物通常会增加 SOC 储量;(2) 长期高存栏量与 SOC 的净损失有关;(3) 禁牧或禁牧会导致 SOC 的少量增加,特别是在退化的土壤中;(4) 从耕作到永久性牧场的转换会导致固碳,但受管理历史的影响;(5) 轮牧策略对 SOC 储量的影响与持续放牧相比微乎其微;(6) 水塘最初会增加 SOC 储量,但持续性尚未得到证实。我们结合畜牧业生产的不确定性、相关效益和权衡,讨论了牧场固碳的可能机会,并提出了改进主要管理策略证据基础的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rangeland Journal
Rangeland Journal 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Rangeland Journal publishes original work that makes a significant contribution to understanding the biophysical, social, cultural, economic, and policy influences affecting rangeland use and management throughout the world. Rangelands are defined broadly and include all those environments where natural ecological processes predominate, and where values and benefits are based primarily on natural resources. Articles may present the results of original research, contributions to theory or new conclusions reached from the review of a topic. Their structure need not conform to that of standard scientific articles but writing style must be clear and concise. All material presented must be well documented, critically analysed and objectively presented. All papers are peer-reviewed. The Rangeland Journal is published on behalf of the Australian Rangeland Society.
期刊最新文献
Managing grazing to increase ground cover in rangelands: using remote sensing to detect change Low-emission beef production in the Southern Rangelands of Western Australia: an analysis of herd structure and stocking rate experiencing droughts Evolving nature-based solutions for Australia’s Indigenous estate in 2024 – opportunities and challenges Carbon farming co-benefits: a review of concepts, policy and potential in Australian landscapes The importance of camel (Camelus dromedaries) in the livelihoods of herders: the case of camel herders’ households in peri-urban N’Djamena and pastoral Fitri, Chad
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1