Demographic and socio-economic inequalities in subjective wellbeing: analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys in England 2010–2019

IF 3.6 4区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-09-09 DOI:10.1093/pubmed/fdae247
C Castelletti, F Ogunlayi, M Miret, E Lara,   Oyebode
{"title":"Demographic and socio-economic inequalities in subjective wellbeing: analysis of repeated cross-sectional health surveys in England 2010–2019","authors":"C Castelletti, F Ogunlayi, M Miret, E Lara,   Oyebode","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdae247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Good subjective wellbeing (SWB) is a key societal aspiration. The study of SWB determinants is of increasing interest. The present study aimed to examine national inequalities in SWB, and trends in these inequalities, for England across five demographic (sex and age) and socio-economic (educational level, household income and living alone) characteristics. Method The relative index of inequalities (RII) and slope index of inequalities (SII) were calculated from repeated cross-sectional data from the Health Survey for England from 2010 to 2019 (excluding 2017 and 2018 as our outcome variable was not collected in these years), in a total of 90 236 participants aged 16+. SWB was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), treated as a dichotomous variable with high and low levels of SWB > 40 and ≤ 40, respectively. Results There were significant inequalities in SWB by income (RII from 1.086 to 1.116), educational level (RII from 0.893 to 0.941) and between people living alone or not (RII from 0.908 to 0.937). The RII and SII trends were not statistically significant. Conclusions Higher socio-economic status could play a protective role for SWB, and people in the most deprived socio-economic positions may be at higher risk for low SWB. These associations have remained stable over time.","PeriodicalId":16904,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdae247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Good subjective wellbeing (SWB) is a key societal aspiration. The study of SWB determinants is of increasing interest. The present study aimed to examine national inequalities in SWB, and trends in these inequalities, for England across five demographic (sex and age) and socio-economic (educational level, household income and living alone) characteristics. Method The relative index of inequalities (RII) and slope index of inequalities (SII) were calculated from repeated cross-sectional data from the Health Survey for England from 2010 to 2019 (excluding 2017 and 2018 as our outcome variable was not collected in these years), in a total of 90 236 participants aged 16+. SWB was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), treated as a dichotomous variable with high and low levels of SWB > 40 and ≤ 40, respectively. Results There were significant inequalities in SWB by income (RII from 1.086 to 1.116), educational level (RII from 0.893 to 0.941) and between people living alone or not (RII from 0.908 to 0.937). The RII and SII trends were not statistically significant. Conclusions Higher socio-economic status could play a protective role for SWB, and people in the most deprived socio-economic positions may be at higher risk for low SWB. These associations have remained stable over time.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主观幸福感中的人口和社会经济不平等:2010-2019 年英格兰重复横断面健康调查分析
背景良好的主观幸福感(SWB)是社会的一个重要愿望。对主观幸福感决定因素的研究日益受到关注。本研究旨在考察英格兰五个人口(性别和年龄)和社会经济(教育水平、家庭收入和独居)特征方面的主观幸福感的全国性不平等以及这些不平等的趋势。方法 从 2010 年至 2019 年(不包括 2017 年和 2018 年,因为我们的结果变量没有在这两年收集)英格兰健康调查的重复横截面数据中计算出不平等的相对指数(RII)和不平等的斜率指数(SII),共收集了 90 236 名 16 岁以上的参与者。SWB采用沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表(WEMWBS)进行评估,作为二分变量处理,SWB的高水平和低水平分别为> 40和≤40。结果 收入(RII 从 1.086 到 1.116)、教育水平(RII 从 0.893 到 0.941)以及独居或非独居人群(RII 从 0.908 到 0.937)之间的 SWB 存在明显的不平等。RII 和 SII 的趋势在统计学上并不显著。结论 较高的社会经济地位可能会对自立能力起到保护作用,而处于最贫困社会经济地位的人可能会有较高的自立能力低下的风险。这些关联随着时间的推移保持稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health
Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Previous Title Zeitschrift für Gesundheitswissenschaften, Previous Print ISSN 0943-1853, Previous Online ISSN 1613-2238. The Journal of Public Health: From Theory to Practice is an interdisciplinary publication for the discussion and debate of international public health issues, with a focus on European affairs. It describes the social and individual factors determining the basic conditions of public health, analyzing causal interrelations, and offering a scientifically sound rationale for personal, social and political measures of intervention. Coverage includes contributions from epidemiology, health economics, environmental health, management, social sciences, ethics, and law. ISSN: 2198-1833 (Print) 1613-2238 (Online)
期刊最新文献
How does health visiting in the first year of life vary by family characteristics? A longitudinal analysis of administrative data The correlates of environmental initiatives in sports organizations with climate change attitudes and subjective well-being Enhancing vitamin D levels in care homes: the role of healthy building design in preventing respiratory infections ‘Sleeping with the enemy’: a cross-sectional study on psychological and emotional violence among couples living in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic Association between neonatal mortality and births not weighed among 400 thousand institutional deliveries in 32 low- and middle-income countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1