Protocol for a scoping review of theorised pathways between home energy decarbonisation and health and health inequalities

Vicki Ponce Hardy, Amy Stevenson, Gerry McCartney, Alison Heppenstall, Petra Meier
{"title":"Protocol for a scoping review of theorised pathways between home energy decarbonisation and health and health inequalities","authors":"Vicki Ponce Hardy, Amy Stevenson, Gerry McCartney, Alison Heppenstall, Petra Meier","doi":"10.1101/2024.08.23.24312045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Access to adequate energy in the home is necessary for a healthy and well life, however current energy use, particularly in high-income countries, is unsustainable. Decarbonisation of home energy can benefit climate mitigation and health but there is the potential to create new, or compound existing, inequalities in health if not implemented equitably. Mapping the theoretical causal pathways between home decarbonisation and health will contribute to further understanding of these mechanisms. Aims: Firstly, to identify theoretical pathways between decarbonisation of home energy and health and health inequalities in high-income countries, and secondly, to synthesise these into a putative causal evidence map. Inclusion criteria: All populations in high-income countries are included, as defined by the World Bank in 2023/24. Included concepts are decarbonisation of home energy, and health and health inequalities. Context for this review comprises of the inclusion of a clear theory linking the concepts. All study designs are included. Methods: This protocol is for a review of theories rather than of intervention effectiveness. Medline/OVID, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched, with no limitation on date. Relevant international policy websites will also be searched. The search is limited to papers in English. Citation tracing may identify further relevant papers. Abstracts and full texts will be screened using Rayyan. At least 10% will be double-screened, and the rest screened by one author, and included full texts will be screened until data saturation is reached. Study inclusion is based on consistency with the inclusion criteria, with some flexibility allowed due to the theoretical nature of this review. Data extracted from papers will be used to develop a diagrammatic map of pathways.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.23.24312045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Access to adequate energy in the home is necessary for a healthy and well life, however current energy use, particularly in high-income countries, is unsustainable. Decarbonisation of home energy can benefit climate mitigation and health but there is the potential to create new, or compound existing, inequalities in health if not implemented equitably. Mapping the theoretical causal pathways between home decarbonisation and health will contribute to further understanding of these mechanisms. Aims: Firstly, to identify theoretical pathways between decarbonisation of home energy and health and health inequalities in high-income countries, and secondly, to synthesise these into a putative causal evidence map. Inclusion criteria: All populations in high-income countries are included, as defined by the World Bank in 2023/24. Included concepts are decarbonisation of home energy, and health and health inequalities. Context for this review comprises of the inclusion of a clear theory linking the concepts. All study designs are included. Methods: This protocol is for a review of theories rather than of intervention effectiveness. Medline/OVID, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched, with no limitation on date. Relevant international policy websites will also be searched. The search is limited to papers in English. Citation tracing may identify further relevant papers. Abstracts and full texts will be screened using Rayyan. At least 10% will be double-screened, and the rest screened by one author, and included full texts will be screened until data saturation is reached. Study inclusion is based on consistency with the inclusion criteria, with some flexibility allowed due to the theoretical nature of this review. Data extracted from papers will be used to develop a diagrammatic map of pathways.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对家庭能源去碳化与健康和健康不平等之间的理论路径进行范围界定审查的议定书
导言:获得充足的家庭能源是健康和美好生活的必要条件,但目前的能源使用,尤其是在高收入国家,是不可持续的。家庭能源去碳化有利于减缓气候变化和促进健康,但如果不能公平实施,有可能造成新的健康不平等,或加剧现有的健康不平等。绘制家庭能源去碳化与健康之间的理论因果路径图将有助于进一步了解这些机制。目的:首先,在高收入国家确定家庭能源去碳化与健康和健康不平等之间的理论路径;其次,将这些路径综合为一个推定的因果证据图。纳入标准:根据世界银行 2023/24 年的定义,高收入国家的所有人口都包括在内。包括的概念有家庭能源去碳化、健康和健康不平等。本综述的背景包括将这些概念联系起来的明确理论。所有研究设计均包括在内。方法:本协议是对理论而非干预效果的综述。将检索 Medline/OVID、Scopus 和 EconLit,日期不限。还将搜索相关的国际政策网站。搜索仅限于英文论文。引文追踪可能会发现更多相关论文。将使用 Rayyan 对摘要和全文进行筛选。至少 10%的论文将进行双重筛选,其余论文由一位作者筛选,并将对收录的全文进行筛选,直到数据达到饱和为止。纳入研究的依据是是否符合纳入标准,但由于本综述的理论性质,允许有一定的灵活性。从论文中提取的数据将用于绘制路径图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of User Experiences in Harm Reduction Programs Development and validation of a 5-year risk model using mammogram risk scores generated from screening digital breast tomosynthesis Causes of Pediatric Deaths in Lusaka, Zambia: A Quantitative Geographic Information Systems Approach Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review A systematic review of psychological factors influencing attitudes and intentions toward, and uptake of, Covid-19 vaccines in adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1