The Practice of Gender and Protection Mainstreaming in Health Response in Humanitarian Crisis - A Case Study from the Refugee Camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh

Charls Erik Halder
{"title":"The Practice of Gender and Protection Mainstreaming in Health Response in Humanitarian Crisis - A Case Study from the Refugee Camps in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh","authors":"Charls Erik Halder","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.10.24313420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The health system is required to be safe, equitable, and accessible to all ages, gender, and vulnerable groups, including older persons and persons with disability, and address their specific needs and concerns. However, limited evidence is available on the effectiveness and practicality of gender and protection mainstreaming interventions in health response in humanitarian crises.\nObjective: The overall objective of the research was to explore practices, gaps, and challenges and generate recommendations regarding gender and protection mainstreaming in health response to the Rohingya refugee crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Methodology: The research employed a qualitative case study design to explore the practice of gender and protection mainstreaming in health response in Cox’s Bazar. Data collection methods include an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with professionals.\nResult: The study found a range of good practices on gender and protection mainstreaming in health response, e.g. placement of a gender action plan, monitoring system for gender and disability inclusion, emergency preparedness and response system, availability of sex-segregated toilets and waiting spaces, availability of gender-based violence service and engagement of female community health workers. The study also revealed some best practices which have the potential to scale up, e,g. psycho-social spaces at health facilities for children, palliative care for terminally ill patients, integrated medical and protection services, and facilitation of community health facility support groups. Critical gaps were found in the areas of women’s leadership, coordination, capacity building, targeted interventions for vulnerable groups, infrastructural adaptation and consultation with the community on their concerns.\nConclusion: We urge policymakers, sector coordinators, health program management, healthcare workers, and global stakeholders to address the gaps and challenges, learn and scale up the best practices, and take action to implement the study's recommendations to maximise gender and protection mainstreaming in health response.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.10.24313420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The health system is required to be safe, equitable, and accessible to all ages, gender, and vulnerable groups, including older persons and persons with disability, and address their specific needs and concerns. However, limited evidence is available on the effectiveness and practicality of gender and protection mainstreaming interventions in health response in humanitarian crises. Objective: The overall objective of the research was to explore practices, gaps, and challenges and generate recommendations regarding gender and protection mainstreaming in health response to the Rohingya refugee crisis in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh. Methodology: The research employed a qualitative case study design to explore the practice of gender and protection mainstreaming in health response in Cox’s Bazar. Data collection methods include an extensive literature review and in-depth interviews with professionals. Result: The study found a range of good practices on gender and protection mainstreaming in health response, e.g. placement of a gender action plan, monitoring system for gender and disability inclusion, emergency preparedness and response system, availability of sex-segregated toilets and waiting spaces, availability of gender-based violence service and engagement of female community health workers. The study also revealed some best practices which have the potential to scale up, e,g. psycho-social spaces at health facilities for children, palliative care for terminally ill patients, integrated medical and protection services, and facilitation of community health facility support groups. Critical gaps were found in the areas of women’s leadership, coordination, capacity building, targeted interventions for vulnerable groups, infrastructural adaptation and consultation with the community on their concerns. Conclusion: We urge policymakers, sector coordinators, health program management, healthcare workers, and global stakeholders to address the gaps and challenges, learn and scale up the best practices, and take action to implement the study's recommendations to maximise gender and protection mainstreaming in health response.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将性别和保护问题纳入人道主义危机卫生响应主流的实践--孟加拉国考克斯巴扎尔难民营的案例研究
背景:卫生系统必须安全、公平,所有年龄段、性别和弱势群体(包括老年人和残疾人)都能使用,并满足他们的特殊需求和关切。然而,关于在人道主义危机中将性别和保护问题纳入医疗卫生应对措施主流的有效性和实用性的证据却很有限:本研究的总体目标是探讨孟加拉国科克斯巴扎尔地区罗辛亚难民危机卫生响应中性别和保护主流化的实践、差距和挑战,并提出相关建议。研究方法:本研究采用定性案例研究设计,探讨将性别和保护问题纳入科克斯巴扎尔卫生应急工作主流的做法。数据收集方法包括广泛的文献综述和对专业人员的深入访谈:研究发现了一系列将性别和保护问题纳入卫生应急工作主流的良好做法,例如制定性别行动计划、建立性别和残疾融入监测系统、建立应急准备和响应系统、提供男女分开的厕所和候诊空间、提供性别暴力服务以及聘用女性社区卫生工作者。这项研究还揭示了一些有可能推广的最佳做法,例如在医疗卫生机构为儿童提供社会心理空间、为临终病人提供姑息治疗、提供综合医疗和保护服务,以及为社区医疗卫生机构支助小组提供便利。在妇女领导力、协调、能力建设、针对弱势群体的干预措施、基础设施改造以及就社区关切的问题与社区协商等方面,我们发现存在严重不足:我们敦促政策制定者、部门协调员、卫生项目管理人员、卫生保健工作者和全球利益相关者应对差距和挑战,学习和推广最佳实践,并采取行动落实研究建议,最大限度地将性别和保护问题纳入卫生应对措施的主流。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Qualitative Study of User Experiences in Harm Reduction Programs Development and validation of a 5-year risk model using mammogram risk scores generated from screening digital breast tomosynthesis Causes of Pediatric Deaths in Lusaka, Zambia: A Quantitative Geographic Information Systems Approach Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review A systematic review of psychological factors influencing attitudes and intentions toward, and uptake of, Covid-19 vaccines in adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1