Predictors of outcomes in conservative management of high-grade renal trauma

IF 0.5 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY African Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-09-06 DOI:10.1186/s12301-024-00448-9
K. R. Surag, Kasi Viswanath Gali, Abhijit Shah, A. V. B. Krishnakanth, Anshuman Singh, Abhishek Goli, Arun Chawla, Padmaraj Hegde, Anupam Choudhary
{"title":"Predictors of outcomes in conservative management of high-grade renal trauma","authors":"K. R. Surag, Kasi Viswanath Gali, Abhijit Shah, A. V. B. Krishnakanth, Anshuman Singh, Abhishek Goli, Arun Chawla, Padmaraj Hegde, Anupam Choudhary","doi":"10.1186/s12301-024-00448-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management of high-grade renal trauma is debatable, with the recent evidence embracing a conservative approach in the management of even grade 5 renal injuries. The study aimed to analyze the clinical profile of patients with high-grade renal trauma, assessing their management strategies, outcomes, complications, and need for ancillary procedures. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data was performed involving blunt abdominal trauma patients with high-grade renal injuries (Grade 4 and 5) presenting to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. Patient data analyzed included demographics, clinical presentation, injury characteristics, complications, ancillary procedures, and mortality rates. All patients underwent renal functional assessment using an isotope renogram scan at the 3-month follow-up. Data collected were entered into a database and subjected to descriptive analysis using Jamovi version 2.3.28. The study included 45 patients with a mean age of 29 years and a male-to-female ratio of 41:4. Most patients (n = 42) were managed conservatively. Thirty-eight patients had grade 4 injuries, and seven had grade 5 injuries. Twenty-six patients suffered renal parenchymal injuries alone, three patients had renal vascular injuries alone, and 16 patients had both parenchymal and vascular injuries. Grade 5 renal injury (p < 0.001), vascular high-grade injury (p < 0.001), angioembolization (p < 0.001), and blood transfusions (p = 0.021) were significantly associated with the incidence of poorly functioning kidney in high-grade renal trauma patients managed conservatively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed angioembolization (p < 0.001), poorly functioning kidney post-trauma (p < 0.001), and blood transfusions (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with high-grade renal vascular injuries compared to high-grade renal parenchymal injuries. Conservative management is advisable for high-grade renal trauma in hemodynamically stable patients. High-grade vascular injuries are more severe than parenchymal injuries and correlate with poorer renal functional outcomes. Grade 5 renal injury, predominantly vascular high-grade injury, and the requirement for angioembolization and blood transfusions serve as significant predictors of poorly functioning kidneys post-trauma. Urologists should consider these predictors when counseling patients regarding potential outcomes following conservative management of high-grade renal trauma.","PeriodicalId":7432,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12301-024-00448-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Management of high-grade renal trauma is debatable, with the recent evidence embracing a conservative approach in the management of even grade 5 renal injuries. The study aimed to analyze the clinical profile of patients with high-grade renal trauma, assessing their management strategies, outcomes, complications, and need for ancillary procedures. A retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained data was performed involving blunt abdominal trauma patients with high-grade renal injuries (Grade 4 and 5) presenting to our hospital from January 2018 to December 2022. Patient data analyzed included demographics, clinical presentation, injury characteristics, complications, ancillary procedures, and mortality rates. All patients underwent renal functional assessment using an isotope renogram scan at the 3-month follow-up. Data collected were entered into a database and subjected to descriptive analysis using Jamovi version 2.3.28. The study included 45 patients with a mean age of 29 years and a male-to-female ratio of 41:4. Most patients (n = 42) were managed conservatively. Thirty-eight patients had grade 4 injuries, and seven had grade 5 injuries. Twenty-six patients suffered renal parenchymal injuries alone, three patients had renal vascular injuries alone, and 16 patients had both parenchymal and vascular injuries. Grade 5 renal injury (p < 0.001), vascular high-grade injury (p < 0.001), angioembolization (p < 0.001), and blood transfusions (p = 0.021) were significantly associated with the incidence of poorly functioning kidney in high-grade renal trauma patients managed conservatively. Multinomial logistic regression analysis revealed angioembolization (p < 0.001), poorly functioning kidney post-trauma (p < 0.001), and blood transfusions (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with high-grade renal vascular injuries compared to high-grade renal parenchymal injuries. Conservative management is advisable for high-grade renal trauma in hemodynamically stable patients. High-grade vascular injuries are more severe than parenchymal injuries and correlate with poorer renal functional outcomes. Grade 5 renal injury, predominantly vascular high-grade injury, and the requirement for angioembolization and blood transfusions serve as significant predictors of poorly functioning kidneys post-trauma. Urologists should consider these predictors when counseling patients regarding potential outcomes following conservative management of high-grade renal trauma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高位肾创伤保守治疗效果的预测因素
对高级别肾创伤的处理尚存在争议,最近的证据表明,即使是 5 级肾损伤也应采取保守的处理方法。该研究旨在分析高级别肾创伤患者的临床概况,评估他们的治疗策略、疗效、并发症以及对辅助手术的需求。该研究对前瞻性保存的数据进行了回顾性分析,涉及2018年1月至2022年12月到我院就诊的高级别肾损伤(4级和5级)腹部钝性创伤患者。分析的患者数据包括人口统计学、临床表现、损伤特征、并发症、辅助手术和死亡率。所有患者在 3 个月随访时都接受了同位素肾图扫描肾功能评估。收集到的数据被输入数据库,并使用 Jamovi 2.3.28 版进行描述性分析。该研究包括 45 名患者,平均年龄为 29 岁,男女比例为 41:4。大多数患者(n = 42)接受了保守治疗。38 名患者为 4 级损伤,7 名患者为 5 级损伤。26名患者仅有肾实质损伤,3名患者仅有肾血管损伤,16名患者同时有肾实质和血管损伤。5级肾损伤(p < 0.001)、血管高级别损伤(p < 0.001)、血管栓塞(p < 0.001)和输血(p = 0.021)与保守治疗的高级别肾创伤患者肾功能不全的发生率显著相关。多项式逻辑回归分析显示,与高级别肾实质损伤相比,血管栓塞(p < 0.001)、创伤后肾功能不良(p < 0.001)和输血(p < 0.001)与高级别肾血管损伤显著相关。对于血流动力学稳定的高级别肾创伤患者,保守治疗是可取的。高级别血管损伤比肾实质损伤更为严重,与较差的肾功能预后相关。5 级肾损伤、主要是血管性高级损伤、需要血管栓塞和输血是预测创伤后肾功能不良的重要因素。泌尿科医生在指导患者保守治疗高级别肾创伤后可能出现的结果时,应考虑这些预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Urology
African Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Digital rectal exam in prostate cancer screening: a critical review of the ERSPC Rotterdam study Outcome of perioperative immune enhancing nutrition in patients undergoing radical cystectomy A prospective study of the association between varicoceles and semen quality in men with infertility Comparison of combination therapy with tamsulosin and dutasteride or finasteride in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized clinical trial Can the parameters of penile duplex assessment predict the success of urethroplasty?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1