The Light Switch and the Dimmer: Qualitative Observations to Improve Diagnostic Lacrimal Irrigation.

Abstract

PURPOSE To emphasise the importance of "soft" observations during lacrimal irrigation in diagnosing lacrimal outflow dysfunction and reporting outcomes of soft factors post-DCR. METHODS A retrospective study of patients with ≤ 20% of regurgitation on lacrimal irrigation who underwent DCR surgery. A comparative analysis of percentage reflux of saline (RFX), initial mucus in reflux (IMR), patient-reported transit time of saline (PR-TTS), and resistance encountered (RES) during LS was performed. Validated TEARS score was used. Subjective success was defined as ≥ 2-point improvement in T subscale of TEARS score. Objective success, as a decrease in RFX, RES, PR-TTS and absence of IMR, post-operatively. RESULTS From a total of 253 patients who underwent DCR surgery, 8 patients met the inclusion criteria. All patients were T4 (wiping >10× daily) indoors and outdoors. TEARS score improved after surgery with a mean reduction of T = 2.62, E = 1.63 and A = 1.35 (p < .05) with no significant change in R scores (p = .10). A mean reduction in RFX of 11.75 ± 6.74% and a median improvement of 1 point in PR-TTS and 2 point in RES was observed (p < .05). No significant changes of these parameters occurred in the contralateral side during this period. Subjective and objective success of DCR was 75% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to attempt to combine qualitative "soft" observations during lacrimal irrigation such as IMR, RES and PR-TTS for identifying nasolacrimal outflow dysfunction and reporting outcomes using these parameters of DCR in patients with epiphora and ≤ 20% of fluid regurgitation. These parameters were greater in the more symptomatic side and successfully improved after DCR, making them a valuable tool to reach a provisional diagnosis.