Comparison of a new MR rapid wash-out map with MR perfusion in brain tumors

Abstract

MR perfusion is a standard marker to distinguish progression and therapy-associated changes after surgery and radiochemotherapy for glioblastoma. TRAMs (Treatment Response Assessment Maps) were introduced, which are intended to facilitate the differentiation of vital tumor cells and radiation necrosis by means of late (20–90 min) contrast clearance and enhancement. The differences of MR perfusion and late-enhancement are not fully understood yet. We have implemented and established a fully automated creation of rapid wash-out (15–20 min interval) maps in our clinic. We included patients with glioblastoma, CNS lymphoma or brain metastases who underwent our MR protocol with MR perfusion and rapid wash-out between 01/01/2024 and 30/06/2024. Since both wash-out and hyperperfusion are intended to depict the active tumor area, this study involves a quantitative and qualitative comparison of both methods. For this purpose, we volumetrically measured rCBV (relative cerebral blood volume) maps and rapid wash-out maps separately (two raters). Additionally, we rated the agreement between both maps on a Likert scale (0–10). Thirty-two patients were included in the study: 15 with glioblastoma, 7 with CNS lymphomas and 10 with brain metastasis. We calculated 36 rapid wash-out maps (9 initial diagnosis, 27 follow-up). Visual agreement of MR perfusion with rapid wash-out by rating were found in 44 ± 40% for initial diagnosis, and 75 ± 31% for follow-up. We found a strong correlation (Pearson coefficient 0.92, p < 0.001) between the measured volumes of MR perfusion and rapid wash-out. The measured volumes of MR perfusion and rapid wash-out did not differ significantly. Small lesions were often not detected by MR perfusion. Nevertheless, the measured volumes showed no significant differences in this small cohort. Rapid wash-out calculation is a simple tool that provides new information and, when used in conjunction with MR perfusion, may increase diagnostic accuracy. The method shows promising results, particularly in the evaluation of small lesions.