Uncertain seismic response and robustness analysis of isolated continuous girder bridges

IF 2.1 4区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Advances in Structural Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1177/13694332241281533
Xiaohong Long, Zonglin Li, Xiaopeng Gu, Xingwang Chen, Yongtao Ma
{"title":"Uncertain seismic response and robustness analysis of isolated continuous girder bridges","authors":"Xiaohong Long, Zonglin Li, Xiaopeng Gu, Xingwang Chen, Yongtao Ma","doi":"10.1177/13694332241281533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When calculating the seismic response of structures, conventional methods often neglect uncertainty and suffer from excessive computation. Although robustness metrics have been effective in evaluating structural safety, they are not suitable for isolated continuous girder bridges (ICGB). To address this issue, this paper introduces an uncertain seismic response and robustness assessment method tailored to ICGB: Firstly, the method considers uncertainty in material parameters and ground motion by constructing a data set using Monte Carlo simulation. Secondly, a genetic algorithm for parallel optimisation of radial basis function neural network (GAPO-RBFNN) is trained to predict the seismic responses of the bridges. Thirdly, a robustness metric specifically designed for bridges is derived and applied to bridge. Finally, the proposed robustness metric is validated on lead rubber bearing (LRB) and shape memory alloy-lead rubber bearing (SMA-LRB) bridges. Results indicate that the GAPO-RBFNN model accurately approximates the mapping relationship between structural parameters and seismic response, with an average error of only 0.32% and a 70% reduction in computation time compared with traditional methods. Moreover, the new robustness metric overcomes the limitations of the dismantled member method and is applicable to bridge. The robustness of the SMA-LRB-ICGB, strengthened by SMA, is improved, providing evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed robustness metric.","PeriodicalId":50849,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13694332241281533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When calculating the seismic response of structures, conventional methods often neglect uncertainty and suffer from excessive computation. Although robustness metrics have been effective in evaluating structural safety, they are not suitable for isolated continuous girder bridges (ICGB). To address this issue, this paper introduces an uncertain seismic response and robustness assessment method tailored to ICGB: Firstly, the method considers uncertainty in material parameters and ground motion by constructing a data set using Monte Carlo simulation. Secondly, a genetic algorithm for parallel optimisation of radial basis function neural network (GAPO-RBFNN) is trained to predict the seismic responses of the bridges. Thirdly, a robustness metric specifically designed for bridges is derived and applied to bridge. Finally, the proposed robustness metric is validated on lead rubber bearing (LRB) and shape memory alloy-lead rubber bearing (SMA-LRB) bridges. Results indicate that the GAPO-RBFNN model accurately approximates the mapping relationship between structural parameters and seismic response, with an average error of only 0.32% and a 70% reduction in computation time compared with traditional methods. Moreover, the new robustness metric overcomes the limitations of the dismantled member method and is applicable to bridge. The robustness of the SMA-LRB-ICGB, strengthened by SMA, is improved, providing evidence of the effectiveness of the proposed robustness metric.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
孤立连续梁桥的不确定地震响应和稳健性分析
在计算结构的地震响应时,传统方法通常会忽略不确定性,并存在计算量过大的问题。尽管稳健性指标在评估结构安全方面非常有效,但它们并不适用于孤立连续梁桥(ICGB)。针对这一问题,本文介绍了一种针对 ICGB 的不确定地震响应和鲁棒性评估方法:首先,该方法通过蒙特卡罗模拟构建数据集,考虑了材料参数和地面运动的不确定性。其次,对径向基函数神经网络并行优化遗传算法(GAPO-RBFNN)进行训练,以预测桥梁的地震响应。第三,得出专为桥梁设计的鲁棒性指标,并将其应用于桥梁。最后,在铅橡胶支座(LRB)和形状记忆合金-铅橡胶支座(SMA-LRB)桥梁上验证了所提出的鲁棒性指标。结果表明,GAPO-RBFNN 模型准确地近似了结构参数与地震响应之间的映射关系,与传统方法相比,平均误差仅为 0.32%,计算时间减少了 70%。此外,新的鲁棒性指标克服了拆卸构件法的局限性,适用于桥梁。通过 SMA 加固的 SMA-LRB-ICGB 的鲁棒性得到了改善,证明了所提鲁棒性指标的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Structural Engineering
Advances in Structural Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
230
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Advances in Structural Engineering was established in 1997 and has become one of the major peer-reviewed journals in the field of structural engineering. To better fulfil the mission of the journal, we have recently decided to launch two new features for the journal: (a) invited review papers providing an in-depth exposition of a topic of significant current interest; (b) short papers reporting truly new technologies in structural engineering.
期刊最新文献
Multi-experimental seismic analysis of low-rise thin reinforced concrete wall building with unconnected elastomeric isolators using real-time hybrid simulations Prediction and optimization framework of shear strength of reinforced concrete flanged shear wall based on machine learning and non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II Deep learning-based minute-scale digital prediction model for temperature induced deflection of a multi-tower double-layer steel truss bridge Experimental investigation on shear behavior of double-row perforated GFRP rib connectors in FRP-concrete hybrid beams Seismic response prediction method of train-bridge coupled system based on convolutional neural network-bidirectional long short-term memory-attention modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1