Lisdexamfetamine maintenance treatment for binge-eating disorder following successful treatments: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Psychological Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1017/s003329172400148x
Carlos M. Grilo, Valentina Ivezaj, Sydney Yurkow, Cenk Tek, Ashley A. Wiedemann, Ralitza Gueorguieva
{"title":"Lisdexamfetamine maintenance treatment for binge-eating disorder following successful treatments: randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial","authors":"Carlos M. Grilo, Valentina Ivezaj, Sydney Yurkow, Cenk Tek, Ashley A. Wiedemann, Ralitza Gueorguieva","doi":"10.1017/s003329172400148x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Controlled research examining maintenance treatments for responders to acute interventions for binge-eating disorder (BED) is limited. This study tested efficacy of lisdexamfetamine (LDX) maintenance treatment amongst acute responders. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled single-site trial, conducted March 2019 to September 2023, tested LDX as maintenance treatment for responders to acute treatments with LDX-alone or with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT + LDX) for BED with obesity. Sixty-one (83.6% women, mean age 44.3, mean BMI 36.1 kg/m<jats:sup>2</jats:sup>) acute responders were randomized to LDX (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 32) or placebo (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 29) for 12 weeks; 95.1% completed posttreatment assessments. Mixed-models and generalized-estimating equations comparing maintenance LDX <jats:italic>v.</jats:italic> placebo included main/interactive effects of acute (LDX or CBT + LDX) treatments to examine their predictive/moderating effects. Results Relapse rates (to diagnosis-level binge-eating frequency) following maintenance treatments were 10.0% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 3/30) for LDX and 17.9% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 5/28) for placebo; intention-to-treat binge-eating remission rates were 59.4% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 19/32) and 65.5% (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 19/29), respectively. Maintenance LDX and placebo did not differ significantly in binge-eating but differed in weight-loss and eating-disorder psychopathology. Maintenance LDX was associated with significant weight-loss (−2.3%) whereas placebo had significant weight-gain (+2.2%); LDX and placebo differed significantly in weight-change throughout treatment and at posttreatment. Eating-disorder psychopathology remained unchanged with LDX but increased significantly with placebo. Acute treatments did not significantly predict/moderate maintenance-treatment outcomes. Conclusions Adults with BED/obesity who respond to acute lisdexamfetamine treatment (regardless of additionally receiving CBT) had good maintenance during subsequent 12-weeks. Maintenance lisdexamfetamine, relative to placebo, did not provide further benefit for binge-eating but was associated with significantly better eating-disorder psychopathology outcomes and greater weight-loss.","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s003329172400148x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Controlled research examining maintenance treatments for responders to acute interventions for binge-eating disorder (BED) is limited. This study tested efficacy of lisdexamfetamine (LDX) maintenance treatment amongst acute responders. Methods This prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled single-site trial, conducted March 2019 to September 2023, tested LDX as maintenance treatment for responders to acute treatments with LDX-alone or with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT + LDX) for BED with obesity. Sixty-one (83.6% women, mean age 44.3, mean BMI 36.1 kg/m2) acute responders were randomized to LDX (N = 32) or placebo (N = 29) for 12 weeks; 95.1% completed posttreatment assessments. Mixed-models and generalized-estimating equations comparing maintenance LDX v. placebo included main/interactive effects of acute (LDX or CBT + LDX) treatments to examine their predictive/moderating effects. Results Relapse rates (to diagnosis-level binge-eating frequency) following maintenance treatments were 10.0% (N = 3/30) for LDX and 17.9% (N = 5/28) for placebo; intention-to-treat binge-eating remission rates were 59.4% (N = 19/32) and 65.5% (N = 19/29), respectively. Maintenance LDX and placebo did not differ significantly in binge-eating but differed in weight-loss and eating-disorder psychopathology. Maintenance LDX was associated with significant weight-loss (−2.3%) whereas placebo had significant weight-gain (+2.2%); LDX and placebo differed significantly in weight-change throughout treatment and at posttreatment. Eating-disorder psychopathology remained unchanged with LDX but increased significantly with placebo. Acute treatments did not significantly predict/moderate maintenance-treatment outcomes. Conclusions Adults with BED/obesity who respond to acute lisdexamfetamine treatment (regardless of additionally receiving CBT) had good maintenance during subsequent 12-weeks. Maintenance lisdexamfetamine, relative to placebo, did not provide further benefit for binge-eating but was associated with significantly better eating-disorder psychopathology outcomes and greater weight-loss.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
暴食症成功治疗后的利舍胺维持治疗:随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
背景 对暴饮暴食症(BED)急性期干预措施应答者进行维持治疗的对照研究十分有限。本研究测试了利血平(LDX)对急性期应答者进行维持治疗的疗效。方法 这项前瞻性随机双盲安慰剂对照单点试验于2019年3月至2023年9月进行,测试了LDX作为单独使用LDX或认知行为疗法(CBT + LDX)治疗暴食症合并肥胖症的急性期应答者的维持治疗。61名(83.6%为女性,平均年龄44.3岁,平均体重指数36.1 kg/m2)急性期应答者被随机分配到LDX(32人)或安慰剂(29人)治疗12周;95.1%完成了治疗后评估。混合模型和广义估计方程比较了LDX与安慰剂的维持治疗效果,包括急性期(LDX或CBT + LDX)治疗的主要/交互效应,以检查其预测/调节作用。结果 LDX维持治疗后的复发率(达到诊断水平的暴食频率)为10.0%(3/30),安慰剂为17.9%(5/28);意向治疗暴食缓解率分别为59.4%(19/32)和65.5%(19/29)。维持性 LDX 和安慰剂在暴食方面没有显著差异,但在体重减轻和进食障碍心理病理学方面存在差异。维持性 LDX 可显著降低体重(-2.3%),而安慰剂可显著增加体重(+2.2%);在整个治疗过程中和治疗后,LDX 和安慰剂在体重变化方面存在显著差异。进食障碍心理病理学在使用 LDX 后保持不变,但在使用安慰剂后则明显增加。急性治疗对维持治疗结果的预测/调节作用不明显。结论 对利血平急性治疗(无论是否同时接受了CBT治疗)有反应的成人暴食症/肥胖症患者在随后的12周内保持良好的治疗效果。相对于安慰剂,利司他敏的维持治疗对暴饮暴食没有进一步的益处,但对进食障碍的精神病理学结果和体重减轻有显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychological Medicine
Psychological Medicine 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
711
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.
期刊最新文献
Exposure-based cognitive behavioral therapy delivered by assertive community treatment teams for severe mental illness with symptoms of anxiety: a cluster randomized controlled trial. Effectiveness of attexis, a digital intervention based on cognitive behavioral therapy for adults with ADHD: a randomized controlled trial. Maternal adverse childhood experiences and prenatal stress: Intergenerational transmission and offspring mental health in the ECHO Cohort. Shared and distinct alterations in brain connectivity and cognitive function in subthreshold and major depression. Novel epigenetic loci identified from an epigenome-wide association study underlying brain structural changes in bipolar disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1