Effect of depression treatment on health behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors in primary care patients with depression and elevated cardiovascular risk: data from the eIMPACT trial
Matthew D. Schuiling, Aubrey L. Shell, Christopher M. Callahan, John I. Nurnberger, Krysha L. MacDonald, Robert V. Considine, Wei Wu, Adam T. Hirsh, Christopher A. Crawford, Michelle K. Williams, Timothy C. Lipuma, Samir K. Gupta, Richard J. Kovacs, Bruce L. Rollman, Jesse C. Stewart
{"title":"Effect of depression treatment on health behaviors and cardiovascular risk factors in primary care patients with depression and elevated cardiovascular risk: data from the eIMPACT trial","authors":"Matthew D. Schuiling, Aubrey L. Shell, Christopher M. Callahan, John I. Nurnberger, Krysha L. MacDonald, Robert V. Considine, Wei Wu, Adam T. Hirsh, Christopher A. Crawford, Michelle K. Williams, Timothy C. Lipuma, Samir K. Gupta, Richard J. Kovacs, Bruce L. Rollman, Jesse C. Stewart","doi":"10.1017/s0033291724001429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Depression is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it is unknown if successful depression treatment reduces CVD risk. Methods Using eIMPACT trial data, we examined the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on indicators of CVD risk. A total of 216 primary care patients with depression and elevated CVD risk were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. CVD-relevant health behaviors (self-reported CVD prevention medication adherence, sedentary behavior, and sleep quality) and traditional CVD risk factors (blood pressure and lipid fractions) were assessed over 12 months. Incident CVD events were tracked over four years using a statewide health information exchange. Results The intervention group exhibited greater improvement in depressive symptoms (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.01) and sleep quality (<jats:italic>p <</jats:italic> 0.01) than the usual care group, but there was no intervention effect on systolic blood pressure (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.36), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.38), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.79), triglycerides (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.76), CVD prevention medication adherence (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.64), or sedentary behavior (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.57). There was an intervention effect on diastolic blood pressure that favored the usual care group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.02). The likelihood of an incident CVD event did not differ between the intervention (13/107, 12.1%) and usual care (9/109, 8.3%) groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.39). Conclusions Successful depression treatment alone is not sufficient to lower the heightened CVD risk of people with depression. Alternative approaches are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690","PeriodicalId":20891,"journal":{"name":"Psychological Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291724001429","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Depression is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD), but it is unknown if successful depression treatment reduces CVD risk. Methods Using eIMPACT trial data, we examined the effect of modernized collaborative care for depression on indicators of CVD risk. A total of 216 primary care patients with depression and elevated CVD risk were randomized to 12 months of the eIMPACT intervention (internet cognitive-behavioral therapy [CBT], telephonic CBT, and select antidepressant medications) or usual primary care. CVD-relevant health behaviors (self-reported CVD prevention medication adherence, sedentary behavior, and sleep quality) and traditional CVD risk factors (blood pressure and lipid fractions) were assessed over 12 months. Incident CVD events were tracked over four years using a statewide health information exchange. Results The intervention group exhibited greater improvement in depressive symptoms (p < 0.01) and sleep quality (p < 0.01) than the usual care group, but there was no intervention effect on systolic blood pressure (p = 0.36), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.38), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p = 0.79), triglycerides (p = 0.76), CVD prevention medication adherence (p = 0.64), or sedentary behavior (p = 0.57). There was an intervention effect on diastolic blood pressure that favored the usual care group (p = 0.02). The likelihood of an incident CVD event did not differ between the intervention (13/107, 12.1%) and usual care (9/109, 8.3%) groups (p = 0.39). Conclusions Successful depression treatment alone is not sufficient to lower the heightened CVD risk of people with depression. Alternative approaches are needed. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02458690
期刊介绍:
Now in its fifth decade of publication, Psychological Medicine is a leading international journal in the fields of psychiatry, related aspects of psychology and basic sciences. From 2014, there are 16 issues a year, each featuring original articles reporting key research being undertaken worldwide, together with shorter editorials by distinguished scholars and an important book review section. The journal''s success is clearly demonstrated by a consistently high impact factor.