{"title":"Estimation of Compressive Strength of Rubberised Slag Based Geopolymer Concrete Using Various Machine Learning Techniques Based Models","authors":"Sesha Choudary Yeluri, Karan Singh, Akshay Kumar, Yogesh Aggarwal, Parveen Sihag","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01569-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the quest for sustainable construction practices, researchers have been exploring alternative materials that can reduce the reliance on traditional cement in concrete production. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has surfaced as a promising alternative due to its potential ecological benefits. The formulation of GPC mixtures is a challenging task as there is no specific code provision to determine the mix design. The complexity of determining the optimal mix proportions is compounded by the influence of various factors, including the Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>/NaOH ratio, the quantities of sodium silicate (Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub>) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and differing curing periods, all of which significantly impact the concrete’s mechanical properties. A variety of predictive modeling techniques, including multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), group method of data handling (GMDH), M5P, and linear regression (LR), are used in the estimation of the compressive strength of rubberized slag-based GPC. This study utilizes a dataset comprising 186 observations, which are divided into a training dataset of 130 observations and a testing dataset of 56 observations. The investigation considers various input parameters such as the molarity of NaOH (S), Na<sub>2</sub>SiO<sub>3</sub> quantity (SS), sand quantity (S), coarse aggregate quantity (CA), NaOH quantity (M), the quantity of copper slag (C), rubber aggregate quantity (RA), curing period (D), and fly ash (FA), with the compressive strength serving as the output constraint. The efficacy of these approaches is assessed using performance indices such as the coefficient of correlation (CC), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and scattering index (SI). The findings indicate that the MARS model outperforms the other soft computing techniques, with a testing CC of 0.9634, MAE of 1.4509, RMSE of 1.8465, SI of 0.0480, and NSE of 0.9265. Conversely, the LR model exhibits the least favourable performance, with testing values of CC at 0.8640, MAE at 3.0411, RMSE at 3.5375, SI at 0.0920, and NSE at 0.7303. These results emphasize the potential of MARS as a suitable method for predicting the compressive strength of rubberized slag-based GPC, leading to more sustainable construction methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01569-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the quest for sustainable construction practices, researchers have been exploring alternative materials that can reduce the reliance on traditional cement in concrete production. Geopolymer concrete (GPC) has surfaced as a promising alternative due to its potential ecological benefits. The formulation of GPC mixtures is a challenging task as there is no specific code provision to determine the mix design. The complexity of determining the optimal mix proportions is compounded by the influence of various factors, including the Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio, the quantities of sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) and sodium hydroxide (NaOH), and differing curing periods, all of which significantly impact the concrete’s mechanical properties. A variety of predictive modeling techniques, including multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), group method of data handling (GMDH), M5P, and linear regression (LR), are used in the estimation of the compressive strength of rubberized slag-based GPC. This study utilizes a dataset comprising 186 observations, which are divided into a training dataset of 130 observations and a testing dataset of 56 observations. The investigation considers various input parameters such as the molarity of NaOH (S), Na2SiO3 quantity (SS), sand quantity (S), coarse aggregate quantity (CA), NaOH quantity (M), the quantity of copper slag (C), rubber aggregate quantity (RA), curing period (D), and fly ash (FA), with the compressive strength serving as the output constraint. The efficacy of these approaches is assessed using performance indices such as the coefficient of correlation (CC), Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE), mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and scattering index (SI). The findings indicate that the MARS model outperforms the other soft computing techniques, with a testing CC of 0.9634, MAE of 1.4509, RMSE of 1.8465, SI of 0.0480, and NSE of 0.9265. Conversely, the LR model exhibits the least favourable performance, with testing values of CC at 0.8640, MAE at 3.0411, RMSE at 3.5375, SI at 0.0920, and NSE at 0.7303. These results emphasize the potential of MARS as a suitable method for predicting the compressive strength of rubberized slag-based GPC, leading to more sustainable construction methodologies.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering
and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following:
-Structural engineering-
Earthquake engineering-
Concrete engineering-
Construction management-
Steel structures-
Engineering mechanics-
Water resources engineering-
Hydraulic engineering-
Hydraulic structures-
Environmental engineering-
Soil mechanics-
Foundation engineering-
Geotechnical engineering-
Transportation engineering-
Surveying and geomatics.