A Systematic Review of Anthropogenic Noise Impact on Avian Species

IF 6.4 2区环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Pollution Reports Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s40726-024-00329-3

Margret S. Engel, Robert J. Young, William J. Davies, David Waddington, Michael D. Wood

{"title":"A Systematic Review of Anthropogenic Noise Impact on Avian Species","authors":"Margret S. Engel, Robert J. Young, William J. Davies, David Waddington, Michael D. Wood","doi":"10.1007/s40726-024-00329-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose of review</h3><p>This study aims to investigate anthropogenic noise impact on avian species by means of a systematic review of literature.</p><h3>Recent findings</h3><p>Based on previous anthropogenic noise impact frameworks, it was possible to: clarify the impacts of noise on birds; optimise the existing frameworks with findings produced over 44 years; recategorise noise impacts into more appropriate categories, indicating which are the positive and negatives, as well as acute and chronic impacts caused by anthropogenic noise; provide a significant cluster model of anthropogenic noise impacts on avian species subdivided into impacts on ‘Behaviour’ and ‘Communication/Perception’ (Cluster 1) and ‘Physiology’ (Cluster 2); and show how avian hearing frequency range overlaps noise source frequency range.</p><h3>Summary</h3><p>This research adopted the database of Peacock et al. [1, 2] regarding avian species due to its vast coverage across taxa. A systematic literature review of 50 peer-reviewed papers about anthropogenic noise impact on birds was undertaken. A Two-Step Cluster analysis was calculated, showing the data subdivided into two clusters. Cluster 1 (76.9%) showed behavioural responses mainly composed of negative and auditory perception and communication impacts, presenting positive or negative noise impacts. Cluster 2 (23.1%) mainly showed negative impacts on physiological outcomes caused by traffic, anthropogenic, and background noise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":528,"journal":{"name":"Current Pollution Reports","volume":"10 4","pages":"684 - 709"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40726-024-00329-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pollution Reports","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40726-024-00329-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review

This study aims to investigate anthropogenic noise impact on avian species by means of a systematic review of literature.

Recent findings

Based on previous anthropogenic noise impact frameworks, it was possible to: clarify the impacts of noise on birds; optimise the existing frameworks with findings produced over 44 years; recategorise noise impacts into more appropriate categories, indicating which are the positive and negatives, as well as acute and chronic impacts caused by anthropogenic noise; provide a significant cluster model of anthropogenic noise impacts on avian species subdivided into impacts on ‘Behaviour’ and ‘Communication/Perception’ (Cluster 1) and ‘Physiology’ (Cluster 2); and show how avian hearing frequency range overlaps noise source frequency range.

Summary

This research adopted the database of Peacock et al. [1, 2] regarding avian species due to its vast coverage across taxa. A systematic literature review of 50 peer-reviewed papers about anthropogenic noise impact on birds was undertaken. A Two-Step Cluster analysis was calculated, showing the data subdivided into two clusters. Cluster 1 (76.9%) showed behavioural responses mainly composed of negative and auditory perception and communication impacts, presenting positive or negative noise impacts. Cluster 2 (23.1%) mainly showed negative impacts on physiological outcomes caused by traffic, anthropogenic, and background noise.

Abstract Image

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

人类活动噪声对鸟类物种影响的系统回顾

综述目的本研究旨在通过系统性的文献综述，调查人为噪声对鸟类物种的影响。最新研究结果在以往人为噪声影响框架的基础上，我们可以明确噪声对鸟类的影响；根据 44 年来的研究结果优化现有框架；将噪声影响重新归类为更合适的类别，指出人为噪声造成的积极和消极影响以及急性和慢性影响；提供人为噪声对鸟类物种影响的重要群集模型，细分为对 "行为 "和 "交流/感知"（群集 1）以及 "生理"（群集 2）的影响；并说明鸟类听力频率范围如何与噪声源频率范围重叠。摘要本研究采用了 Peacock 等人[1, 2]关于鸟类物种的数据库，因为该数据库涵盖了大量类群。对 50 篇关于人为噪声对鸟类影响的同行评审论文进行了系统的文献综述。计算得出的两步聚类分析结果显示，数据被细分为两个聚类。聚类 1（76.9%）显示的行为反应主要由负面和听觉感知及交流影响组成，呈现出正面或负面的噪声影响。第 2 组（23.1%）主要显示交通噪音、人为噪音和背景噪音对生理结果的负面影响。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Current Pollution Reports Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology

CiteScore

12.10

自引率

1.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： Current Pollution Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field of environmental pollution.By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to identification, characterization, treatment, management of pollutants and much more.