{"title":"Slope of Magnetic Field-Density Relation as An Indicator of Magnetic Dominance","authors":"Mengke Zhao, Guang-Xing Li, Keping Qiu","doi":"arxiv-2409.02786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The electromagnetic field is a fundamental force in nature that regulates the\nformation of stars in the universe. Despite decades of efforts, a reliable\nassessment of the importance of the magnetic fields in star formation relations\nremains missing. In star-formation research, our acknowledgment of the\nimportance of magnetic field is best summarized by the Cruther+ 2010 B-rho\nrelation. The relation is either interpreted as proof of the importance of a\nmagnetic field in the collapse, or the result of self-similar collapse where\nthe role of the magnetic is secondary to gravity. Using simulations, we find a\nfundamental relation, ${\\cal M}_{\\rm A}$-k$_{B-\\rho}$(slope of $B-\\rho$\nrelation) relation. This fundamental B-$\\rho$-slope relation enables one to\nmeasure the Alfv\\'enic Mach number, a direct indicator of the importance of the\nmagnetic field, using the distribution of data in the B-$\\rho$ plane. It allows\nus to drive the following empirical $B-\\rho$ relation \\begin{equation} \\frac{B}{B_c} = {\\rm exp}\\left(\\left(\\frac{\\gamma}{{\\cal\nK}}\\right)^{-1}\\left( \\frac{\\rho}{\\rho_c}\\right)^\\frac{\\gamma}{{\\cal\nK}}\\right)\\nonumber, \\end{equation} which offers an excellent fit to the\nCruther et al. data, where we assume ${\\cal M}_{\\rm A}-\\rho$ relation. The\nfoundational ${\\cal M}_{\\rm A}-{\\rm k}_{B-\\rho}$ relation provides an\nindependent way to measure the importance of magnetic field against the\nkinematic motion using multiple magnetic field measurements. Our approach\noffers a new interpretation of Cruther+2010, where a gradual decrease in the\nimportance of B at higher densities is implied.","PeriodicalId":501274,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Plasma Physics","volume":"62 6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Plasma Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.02786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The electromagnetic field is a fundamental force in nature that regulates the
formation of stars in the universe. Despite decades of efforts, a reliable
assessment of the importance of the magnetic fields in star formation relations
remains missing. In star-formation research, our acknowledgment of the
importance of magnetic field is best summarized by the Cruther+ 2010 B-rho
relation. The relation is either interpreted as proof of the importance of a
magnetic field in the collapse, or the result of self-similar collapse where
the role of the magnetic is secondary to gravity. Using simulations, we find a
fundamental relation, ${\cal M}_{\rm A}$-k$_{B-\rho}$(slope of $B-\rho$
relation) relation. This fundamental B-$\rho$-slope relation enables one to
measure the Alfv\'enic Mach number, a direct indicator of the importance of the
magnetic field, using the distribution of data in the B-$\rho$ plane. It allows
us to drive the following empirical $B-\rho$ relation \begin{equation} \frac{B}{B_c} = {\rm exp}\left(\left(\frac{\gamma}{{\cal
K}}\right)^{-1}\left( \frac{\rho}{\rho_c}\right)^\frac{\gamma}{{\cal
K}}\right)\nonumber, \end{equation} which offers an excellent fit to the
Cruther et al. data, where we assume ${\cal M}_{\rm A}-\rho$ relation. The
foundational ${\cal M}_{\rm A}-{\rm k}_{B-\rho}$ relation provides an
independent way to measure the importance of magnetic field against the
kinematic motion using multiple magnetic field measurements. Our approach
offers a new interpretation of Cruther+2010, where a gradual decrease in the
importance of B at higher densities is implied.