{"title":"Multiple tests for restricted mean time lost with competing risks data","authors":"Merle Munko, Dennis Dobler, Marc Ditzhaus","doi":"arxiv-2409.07917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis.\nIn the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean\ntime lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence\nfunction up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the\ncumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing\nRMTL-based tests are limited to two-sample comparisons and mostly to two event\ntypes, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an\narbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic.\nFurthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption\non the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often\noccur in practical applications, e.g., when event times are measured in whole\ndays. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are\nbased on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a\nsecond step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several\nnull hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact\ndependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The\nsmall sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in\nsimulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real data example about\nleukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"398 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis.
In the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean
time lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence
function up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the
cumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing
RMTL-based tests are limited to two-sample comparisons and mostly to two event
types, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an
arbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic.
Furthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption
on the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often
occur in practical applications, e.g., when event times are measured in whole
days. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are
based on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a
second step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several
null hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact
dependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The
small sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in
simulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real data example about
leukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.