Multiple tests for restricted mean time lost with competing risks data

Merle Munko, Dennis Dobler, Marc Ditzhaus
{"title":"Multiple tests for restricted mean time lost with competing risks data","authors":"Merle Munko, Dennis Dobler, Marc Ditzhaus","doi":"arxiv-2409.07917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis.\nIn the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean\ntime lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence\nfunction up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the\ncumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing\nRMTL-based tests are limited to two-sample comparisons and mostly to two event\ntypes, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an\narbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic.\nFurthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption\non the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often\noccur in practical applications, e.g., when event times are measured in whole\ndays. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are\nbased on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a\nsecond step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several\nnull hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact\ndependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The\nsmall sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in\nsimulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real data example about\nleukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"398 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07917","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Easy-to-interpret effect estimands are highly desirable in survival analysis. In the competing risks framework, one good candidate is the restricted mean time lost (RMTL). It is defined as the area under the cumulative incidence function up to a prespecified time point and, thus, it summarizes the cumulative incidence function into a meaningful estimand. While existing RMTL-based tests are limited to two-sample comparisons and mostly to two event types, we aim to develop general contrast tests for factorial designs and an arbitrary number of event types based on a Wald-type test statistic. Furthermore, we avoid the often-made, rather restrictive continuity assumption on the event time distribution. This allows for ties in the data, which often occur in practical applications, e.g., when event times are measured in whole days. In addition, we develop more reliable tests for RMTL comparisons that are based on a permutation approach to improve the small sample performance. In a second step, multiple tests for RMTL comparisons are developed to test several null hypotheses simultaneously. Here, we incorporate the asymptotically exact dependence structure between the local test statistics to gain more power. The small sample performance of the proposed testing procedures is analyzed in simulations and finally illustrated by analyzing a real data example about leukemia patients who underwent bone marrow transplantation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用竞争风险数据对受限平均损失时间进行多重测试
在生存分析中,易于解释的效应估计值是非常可取的。在竞争风险框架中,一个很好的候选指标是受限时间损失(RMTL)。它被定义为截至预设时间点的累积发病率函数下的面积,因此,它将累积发病率函数概括为一个有意义的估计值。现有的基于 RMTL 的检验仅限于两个样本的比较,而且大多仅限于两种事件类型,而我们的目标是基于 Wald 类型的检验统计量,为因子设计和任意数量的事件类型开发通用的对比检验。这就允许了数据中的联系,而这种联系在实际应用中经常出现,例如,当事件时间以整日为单位进行测量时。此外,我们还开发了更可靠的 RMTL 比较检验,这些检验基于置换方法,以提高小样本性能。第二步,我们开发了 RMTL 比较的多重检验,以同时检验多个零假设。在这里,我们加入了局部检验统计量之间的渐近精确依赖结构,以获得更大的检验功率。我们通过模拟分析了所提出的检验程序的小样本性能,最后通过分析一个关于接受骨髓移植的白血病患者的真实数据示例进行了说明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisson approximate likelihood compared to the particle filter Optimising the Trade-Off Between Type I and Type II Errors: A Review and Extensions Bias Reduction in Matched Observational Studies with Continuous Treatments: Calipered Non-Bipartite Matching and Bias-Corrected Estimation and Inference Forecasting age distribution of life-table death counts via α-transformation Probability-scale residuals for event-time data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1