An unbiased rank-based estimator of the Mann-Whitney variance including the case of ties

Edgar Brunner, Frank Konietschke
{"title":"An unbiased rank-based estimator of the Mann-Whitney variance including the case of ties","authors":"Edgar Brunner, Frank Konietschke","doi":"arxiv-2409.05038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many estimators of the variance of the well-known unbiased and uniform most\npowerful estimator $\\htheta$ of the Mann-Whitney effect, $\\theta = P(X < Y) +\n\\nfrac12 P(X=Y)$, are considered in the literature. Some of these estimators\nare only valid in case of no ties or are biased in case of small sample sizes\nwhere the amount of the bias is not discussed. Here we derive an unbiased\nestimator that is based on different rankings, the so-called 'placements'\n(Orban and Wolfe, 1980), and is therefore easy to compute. This estimator does\nnot require the assumption of continuous \\dfs\\ and is also valid in the case of\nties. Moreover, it is shown that this estimator is non-negative and has a sharp\nupper bound which may be considered an empirical version of the well-known\nBirnbaum-Klose inequality. The derivation of this estimator provides an option\nto compute the biases of some commonly used estimators in the literature.\nSimulations demonstrate that, for small sample sizes, the biases of these\nestimators depend on the underlying \\dfs\\ and thus are not under control. This\nmeans that in the case of a biased estimator, simulation results for the type-I\nerror of a test or the coverage probability of a \\ci\\ do not only depend on the\nquality of the approximation of $\\htheta$ by a normal \\db\\ but also an\nadditional unknown bias caused by the variance estimator. Finally, it is shown\nthat this estimator is $L_2$-consistent.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.05038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many estimators of the variance of the well-known unbiased and uniform most powerful estimator $\htheta$ of the Mann-Whitney effect, $\theta = P(X < Y) + \nfrac12 P(X=Y)$, are considered in the literature. Some of these estimators are only valid in case of no ties or are biased in case of small sample sizes where the amount of the bias is not discussed. Here we derive an unbiased estimator that is based on different rankings, the so-called 'placements' (Orban and Wolfe, 1980), and is therefore easy to compute. This estimator does not require the assumption of continuous \dfs\ and is also valid in the case of ties. Moreover, it is shown that this estimator is non-negative and has a sharp upper bound which may be considered an empirical version of the well-known Birnbaum-Klose inequality. The derivation of this estimator provides an option to compute the biases of some commonly used estimators in the literature. Simulations demonstrate that, for small sample sizes, the biases of these estimators depend on the underlying \dfs\ and thus are not under control. This means that in the case of a biased estimator, simulation results for the type-I error of a test or the coverage probability of a \ci\ do not only depend on the quality of the approximation of $\htheta$ by a normal \db\ but also an additional unknown bias caused by the variance estimator. Finally, it is shown that this estimator is $L_2$-consistent.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包括并列情况在内的曼-惠特尼方差无偏等级估计器
文献中考虑了许多著名的曼-惠特尼效应无偏且统一的最有力估计值 $\htheta$ 的方差估计值,即 $\theta = P(X < Y) +\nfrac12 P(X=Y)$ 。其中一些估计值仅在无并列情况下有效,或者在样本量较小的情况下有偏差,而偏差的大小没有讨论。在此,我们根据不同的排名,即所谓的 "位置"(Orban 和 Wolfe,1980 年),推导出一个无偏估计器,因此很容易计算。这个估计值不需要连续的假设,而且在排名的情况下也是有效的。此外,研究还表明,这个估计值是非负的,并且有一个尖锐的上界,可以看作是著名的伯恩鲍姆-克洛泽不等式的经验版本。该估计器的推导为计算文献中一些常用估计器的偏差提供了一个选项。模拟证明,对于小样本量,这些估计器的偏差依赖于基础数据,因此不受控制。这意味着,在有偏差估计器的情况下,检验的类型误差或覆盖概率的模拟结果不仅取决于正态分布对 $\htheta$ 的近似质量,还取决于方差估计器引起的额外未知偏差。最后,研究表明该估计器与 $L_2$ 是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisson approximate likelihood compared to the particle filter Optimising the Trade-Off Between Type I and Type II Errors: A Review and Extensions Bias Reduction in Matched Observational Studies with Continuous Treatments: Calipered Non-Bipartite Matching and Bias-Corrected Estimation and Inference Forecasting age distribution of life-table death counts via α-transformation Probability-scale residuals for event-time data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1