Establishing the Parallels and Differences Between Right-Censored and Missing Covariates

Jesus E. Vazquez, Marissa C. Ashner, Yanyuan Ma, Karen Marder, Tanya P. Garcia
{"title":"Establishing the Parallels and Differences Between Right-Censored and Missing Covariates","authors":"Jesus E. Vazquez, Marissa C. Ashner, Yanyuan Ma, Karen Marder, Tanya P. Garcia","doi":"arxiv-2409.04684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While right-censored time-to-event outcomes have been studied for decades,\nhandling time-to-event covariates, also known as right-censored covariates, is\nnow of growing interest. So far, the literature has treated right-censored\ncovariates as distinct from missing covariates, overlooking the potential\napplicability of estimators to both scenarios. We bridge this gap by\nestablishing connections between right-censored and missing covariates under\nvarious assumptions about censoring and missingness, allowing us to identify\nparallels and differences to determine when estimators can be used in both\ncontexts. These connections reveal adaptations to five estimators for\nright-censored covariates in the unexplored area of informative covariate\nright-censoring and to formulate a new estimator for this setting, where the\nevent time depends on the censoring time. We establish the asymptotic\nproperties of the six estimators, evaluate their robustness under incorrect\ndistributional assumptions, and establish their comparative efficiency. We\nconducted a simulation study to confirm our theoretical results, and then\napplied all estimators to a Huntington disease observational study to analyze\ncognitive impairments as a function of time to clinical diagnosis.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.04684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While right-censored time-to-event outcomes have been studied for decades, handling time-to-event covariates, also known as right-censored covariates, is now of growing interest. So far, the literature has treated right-censored covariates as distinct from missing covariates, overlooking the potential applicability of estimators to both scenarios. We bridge this gap by establishing connections between right-censored and missing covariates under various assumptions about censoring and missingness, allowing us to identify parallels and differences to determine when estimators can be used in both contexts. These connections reveal adaptations to five estimators for right-censored covariates in the unexplored area of informative covariate right-censoring and to formulate a new estimator for this setting, where the event time depends on the censoring time. We establish the asymptotic properties of the six estimators, evaluate their robustness under incorrect distributional assumptions, and establish their comparative efficiency. We conducted a simulation study to confirm our theoretical results, and then applied all estimators to a Huntington disease observational study to analyze cognitive impairments as a function of time to clinical diagnosis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定右删失变量和缺失变量之间的相似性和差异性
右删失时间到事件结果的研究已有几十年历史,而处理时间到事件协变量(也称为右删失协变量)现在越来越受到关注。迄今为止,相关文献一直将右删失协变量与缺失协变量区别对待,忽略了估计值在这两种情况下的潜在适用性。我们通过建立右删失协变量与缺失协变量之间的联系,弥补了这一不足,从而使我们能够找出两者之间的相似之处和不同之处,以确定何时可以在这两种情况下使用估计量。这些联系揭示了在信息协变量右删减这一尚未探索的领域中,五个右删减协变量估计器的适应性,并为这一环境提出了一个新的估计器,其中事件时间取决于删减时间。我们建立了六个估计器的渐近特性,评估了它们在不正确分布假设下的稳健性,并建立了它们的比较效率。我们进行了一项模拟研究来证实我们的理论结果,并将所有估计器应用到亨廷顿病的观察研究中,分析认知障碍与临床诊断时间的函数关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Poisson approximate likelihood compared to the particle filter Optimising the Trade-Off Between Type I and Type II Errors: A Review and Extensions Bias Reduction in Matched Observational Studies with Continuous Treatments: Calipered Non-Bipartite Matching and Bias-Corrected Estimation and Inference Forecasting age distribution of life-table death counts via α-transformation Probability-scale residuals for event-time data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1