{"title":"Same-day service: why healthcare cannot continue to be the exception","authors":"Allen M Chen","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Access to care—defined by the National Academy of Medicine as ‘the timely use of personal health services to achieve the best health outcome’—represents one of the critical public health issues facing society across all populations.1 While barriers to access include those related to logistical coordination, insurance coverage, financial resources, social determinants and/or provider availability, the expedient delivery of healthcare has been well established as a key performance indicator of quality. However, data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality continue to show that approximately 15% of adults in the USA cannot access healthcare in a reasonably rapid fashion.2 Indeed, wait times for appointments are not only frustrating and anxiety-provoking for patients but can adversely impact health outcomes. According to one survey from 2022, the average wait time for a new physician appointment in large metropolitan markets in the USA was a staggering 26 days.3 In areas plagued by physician shortages such as rural communities, the wait times are naturally even more pronounced. Moreover, data from other industrialised countries within the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development seem to suggest that the observed delays in obtaining health services may in fact be worsening.4–6 Due to the practical challenges and inconveniences inherently involved in scheduling appointments, same-day visits have been proposed as a patient-centric means of increasing access to care. On the surface, the proposition is an appealing one—it provides patients with an unprecedented opportunity to be seen by a provider seemingly within hours. In a world where everything from laundry cleaning, food delivery, automobile repairs, hair appointments and entertainment, among a litany of other services, can be scheduled at a moment’s notice, it makes fundamental sense that the one entity that individuals value more than anything— their health—should be prioritised in such a similar fashion. Considering …","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"170 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Access to care—defined by the National Academy of Medicine as ‘the timely use of personal health services to achieve the best health outcome’—represents one of the critical public health issues facing society across all populations.1 While barriers to access include those related to logistical coordination, insurance coverage, financial resources, social determinants and/or provider availability, the expedient delivery of healthcare has been well established as a key performance indicator of quality. However, data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality continue to show that approximately 15% of adults in the USA cannot access healthcare in a reasonably rapid fashion.2 Indeed, wait times for appointments are not only frustrating and anxiety-provoking for patients but can adversely impact health outcomes. According to one survey from 2022, the average wait time for a new physician appointment in large metropolitan markets in the USA was a staggering 26 days.3 In areas plagued by physician shortages such as rural communities, the wait times are naturally even more pronounced. Moreover, data from other industrialised countries within the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development seem to suggest that the observed delays in obtaining health services may in fact be worsening.4–6 Due to the practical challenges and inconveniences inherently involved in scheduling appointments, same-day visits have been proposed as a patient-centric means of increasing access to care. On the surface, the proposition is an appealing one—it provides patients with an unprecedented opportunity to be seen by a provider seemingly within hours. In a world where everything from laundry cleaning, food delivery, automobile repairs, hair appointments and entertainment, among a litany of other services, can be scheduled at a moment’s notice, it makes fundamental sense that the one entity that individuals value more than anything— their health—should be prioritised in such a similar fashion. Considering …
美国国家医学院将获得医疗服务定义为 "及时使用个人医疗服务以达到最佳健康效果",这是全社会所有人群面临的关键公共卫生问题之一。1 虽然获得医疗服务的障碍包括与后勤协调、保险范围、财政资源、社会决定因素和/或医疗服务提供者的可用性有关的障碍,但快速提供医疗服务已被公认为是衡量医疗质量的关键绩效指标。然而,美国医疗保健研究与质量机构(Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality)的数据继续显示,美国约有 15%的成年人无法以合理的方式快速获得医疗保健服务。2 事实上,预约等候时间不仅让患者感到沮丧和焦虑,而且会对健康结果产生不利影响。根据 2022 年的一项调查,在美国大都市,预约新医生的平均等待时间达到了惊人的 26 天。3 在农村社区等医生短缺的地区,等待时间自然会更长。此外,经济合作与发展组织(Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)内其他工业化国家的数据似乎表明,人们所观察到的获得医疗服务的延迟实际上可能正在恶化。4-6 由于预约时间本身所涉及的实际挑战和不便,人们提出了当天出诊作为一种以病人为中心的手段,以增加获得医疗服务的机会。从表面上看,这一提议很有吸引力--它为患者提供了前所未有的机会,让他们在数小时内就能得到医疗服务提供者的诊治。在这个世界上,洗衣、送餐、汽车修理、预约美发和娱乐等一系列服务都可以在接到通知后立即安排,因此,个人最重视的实体--他们的健康--也应该以类似的方式得到优先考虑。考虑到...