The relations between soil hydrophobicity and vegetation in abandoned arable fields on sandy soil

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biologia Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s11756-024-01776-5
Edyta Hewelke, Piotr T. Zaniewski, Artur Pędziwiatr, Dariusz Gozdowski, Ewa B. Górska
{"title":"The relations between soil hydrophobicity and vegetation in abandoned arable fields on sandy soil","authors":"Edyta Hewelke, Piotr T. Zaniewski, Artur Pędziwiatr, Dariusz Gozdowski, Ewa B. Górska","doi":"10.1007/s11756-024-01776-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aimed to find the significant relations between the dominant plant species of secondary succession of lasting abandonment of agricultural fields on sandy soil in central Poland, and soil water repellency strength. The critical soil moisture content for hydrophobicity for individual sites ranged from 10.7 to 16.7%, and the differences were not statistically significant. After periods of prolonged drought, all abandonment agriculture fields indicated lower soil moisture content than critical threshold (10.7–16.7%) for soil water repellency. The soil water repellency was assessed as extreme class based on Water Drop Penetration Time (WDPT) test. The relationship between the main dominant species cover and WDPT test was diverse, with <i>Agrostis gigantea</i> agg<i>.</i> and <i>Avena sativa</i> as a species reaching highest cover within low values of WDPT. Inexpertly <i>Betula pendula</i> agg<i>.</i> (unexpectely<i>)</i> and <i>Pinus sylvestris</i> dominated sites with the highest values of WDPT test. The conducted research indicates that due to climate change, leaving sandy soils in warm temperate climate without an alternative management plan may pose a significant environmental risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":8978,"journal":{"name":"Biologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11756-024-01776-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study aimed to find the significant relations between the dominant plant species of secondary succession of lasting abandonment of agricultural fields on sandy soil in central Poland, and soil water repellency strength. The critical soil moisture content for hydrophobicity for individual sites ranged from 10.7 to 16.7%, and the differences were not statistically significant. After periods of prolonged drought, all abandonment agriculture fields indicated lower soil moisture content than critical threshold (10.7–16.7%) for soil water repellency. The soil water repellency was assessed as extreme class based on Water Drop Penetration Time (WDPT) test. The relationship between the main dominant species cover and WDPT test was diverse, with Agrostis gigantea agg. and Avena sativa as a species reaching highest cover within low values of WDPT. Inexpertly Betula pendula agg. (unexpectely) and Pinus sylvestris dominated sites with the highest values of WDPT test. The conducted research indicates that due to climate change, leaving sandy soils in warm temperate climate without an alternative management plan may pose a significant environmental risk.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沙质土壤上废弃耕地的土壤疏水性与植被之间的关系
该研究旨在发现波兰中部沙质土壤上农田长期废弃后次生演替的优势植物物种与土壤憎水性之间的重要关系。各个地点疏水性的临界土壤含水量从 10.7% 到 16.7% 不等,差异无统计学意义。在长期干旱之后,所有弃耕农田的土壤含水量都低于土壤憎水性的临界值(10.7%-16.7%)。根据水滴石穿时间(WDPT)测试,土壤憎水性被评估为极端等级。主要优势物种覆盖率与水滴石穿时间测试之间的关系多种多样,在水滴石穿时间低值范围内,芒草(Agrostis gigantea agg.在 WDPT 测试值最高的地块中,桦树(意外地)和欧洲赤松(Pinus sylvestris)占主导地位。研究结果表明,由于气候变化,在暖温带气候条件下留下沙质土壤而不采取替代管理计划,可能会造成严重的环境风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biologia
Biologia 生物-生物学
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.70%
发文量
290
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Established in 1946, Biologia publishes high-quality research papers in the fields of microbial, plant and animal sciences. Microbial sciences papers span all aspects of Bacteria, Archaea and microbial Eucarya including biochemistry, cellular and molecular biology, genomics, proteomics and bioinformatics. Plant sciences topics include fundamental research in taxonomy, geobotany, genetics and all fields of experimental botany including cellular, whole-plant and community physiology. Zoology coverage includes animal systematics and taxonomy, morphology, ecology and physiology from cellular to molecular level.
期刊最新文献
Antagonistic and molecular characterization of endophytic Trichoderma from sugarcane Antifungal activity of grape associated bacterial endophytes against pathogenic fungi First karyomorphological analysis of French and Russian tarragon (Artemisia dracunculus L.) Early morphological and histological development and allometric growth of Caspian kutum, Rutilus frisii Responses of macrobenthic invertebrates’ diversity to environmental factors in a tropical freshwater river in Edo State, Nigeria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1