{"title":"Exploring Complexity: An Extended Study of Formal Properties for Process Model Complexity Measures","authors":"Patrizia Schalk, Adam Burke, Robert Lorenz","doi":"arxiv-2408.09871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good process model is expected not only to reflect the behavior of the\nprocess, but also to be as easy to read and understand as possible. Because\npreferences vary across different applications, numerous measures provide ways\nto reflect the complexity of a model with a numeric score. However, this\nabundance of different complexity measures makes it difficult to select one for\nanalysis. Furthermore, most complexity measures are defined for BPMN or EPC,\nbut not for workflow nets. This paper is an extended analysis of complexity measures and their formal\nproperties. It adapts existing complexity measures to the world of workflow\nnets. It then compares these measures with a set of properties originally\ndefined for software complexity, as well as new extensions to it. We discuss\nthe importance of the properties in theory by evaluating whether matured\ncomplexity measures should fulfill them or whether they are optional. We find\nthat not all inspected properties are mandatory, but also demonstrate that the\nbehavior of evolutionary process discovery algorithms is influenced by some of\nthese properties. Our findings help analysts to choose the right complexity\nmeasure for their use-case.","PeriodicalId":501124,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.09871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
A good process model is expected not only to reflect the behavior of the
process, but also to be as easy to read and understand as possible. Because
preferences vary across different applications, numerous measures provide ways
to reflect the complexity of a model with a numeric score. However, this
abundance of different complexity measures makes it difficult to select one for
analysis. Furthermore, most complexity measures are defined for BPMN or EPC,
but not for workflow nets. This paper is an extended analysis of complexity measures and their formal
properties. It adapts existing complexity measures to the world of workflow
nets. It then compares these measures with a set of properties originally
defined for software complexity, as well as new extensions to it. We discuss
the importance of the properties in theory by evaluating whether matured
complexity measures should fulfill them or whether they are optional. We find
that not all inspected properties are mandatory, but also demonstrate that the
behavior of evolutionary process discovery algorithms is influenced by some of
these properties. Our findings help analysts to choose the right complexity
measure for their use-case.