The maximum geometric mean criterion: revisiting the Markowitz–Samuelson debate: survey and analysis

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Annals of Operations Research Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1007/s10479-024-06250-8
Haim Levy
{"title":"The maximum geometric mean criterion: revisiting the Markowitz–Samuelson debate: survey and analysis","authors":"Haim Levy","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06250-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>By the Almost First-degree Stochastic Dominance (AFSD) rule, corresponding only to <i>economically relevant</i> preferences, for an infinite horizon the <span>\\(theoretical\\)</span> claim of both Markowitz and Samuelson is not intact. However, for the practically more relevant case of the long but finite horizon, with stocks-bonds portfolios, Markowitz <span>\\(empirically\\)</span> is right as we find that the MGM portfolio coincides with the optimal myopic portfolio for all risk aversion parameters <span>\\(\\alpha &lt; 1.7\\)</span>. For <span>\\(\\alpha \\ge 1.7\\)</span> the MGM portfolio dominates by AFSD rule all optimal myopic portfolios, as long as the investment horizon is 12–15 years or longer.</p>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-06250-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

By the Almost First-degree Stochastic Dominance (AFSD) rule, corresponding only to economically relevant preferences, for an infinite horizon the \(theoretical\) claim of both Markowitz and Samuelson is not intact. However, for the practically more relevant case of the long but finite horizon, with stocks-bonds portfolios, Markowitz \(empirically\) is right as we find that the MGM portfolio coincides with the optimal myopic portfolio for all risk aversion parameters \(\alpha < 1.7\). For \(\alpha \ge 1.7\) the MGM portfolio dominates by AFSD rule all optimal myopic portfolios, as long as the investment horizon is 12–15 years or longer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
最大几何平均数标准:重温马科维茨-萨缪尔森之争:调查与分析
根据几乎一级随机支配(AFSD)规则,只对应于经济上相关的偏好,对于无限期限,马科维茨和萨缪尔森的(理论上的)主张是不完整的。然而,对于长期但有限期限的实际情况,即股票-债券投资组合,马科维茨是正确的,因为我们发现在所有风险厌恶参数下,MGM投资组合都与最优近视投资组合相吻合。对于(α大于1.7),只要投资期限是12-15年或更长,MGM投资组合就会通过AFSD规则支配所有最优近视投资组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
期刊最新文献
Digital operations research models for intelligent machines (industry 4.0) and man-machine (industry 5.0) systems AI-based decision support systems for sustainable business management under circular economy Leveraging interpretable machine learning in intensive care Correction: Power utility maximization with expert opinions at fixed arrival times in a market with hidden gaussian drift Designing resilient supply chain networks: a systematic literature review of mitigation strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1