Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon

IF 2.5 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w
Raimundo Leonardo Lima de Oliveira, Mila Façanha Gomes, Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira, Débora Cristina Castellani, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Steel Silva Vasconcelos
{"title":"Oil palm agroforestry systems store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than monoculture in the Amazon","authors":"Raimundo Leonardo Lima de Oliveira, Mila Façanha Gomes, Arleu Barbosa Viana-Junior, Wenceslau Geraldes Teixeira, Débora Cristina Castellani, Osvaldo Ryohei Kato, Steel Silva Vasconcelos","doi":"10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup>). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":54387,"journal":{"name":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-024-10166-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agroforestry systems (AFSs) are known to store more carbon and nitrogen in the soil when compared with monocultures. However, studies involving carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates in oil palm plantations, an important global commodity, in AFSs and monocultures are still scarce. Therefore, the objective of this study was to examine whether oil palm AFSs are able to store more carbon and nitrogen in soil aggregates than when planted in monoculture. We collected soil samples in the 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm layers in an oil palm AFS (10 years old) and in an oil palm monoculture (9 years old) in Tomé-Açu, Eastern Amazon, Brazil. We determined soil aggregate stability, carbon and nitrogen contents in macro and microaggregates, and root biomass. Overall, more carbon was stored in the macroaggregates than in the microaggregates in the oil palm plantations. The carbon storage was higher in macro and microaggregates in the AFSs (macro: 12.97 ± 0.35 and micro: 0.53 ± 0.01) than in the monoculture (macro: 11.60 ± 0.19 e micro: 0.29 ± 0.01) in the 0–10 cm layer of the soil. The total soil carbon stock in the 0–30 cm layer was higher in the AFSs (38.08 ± 0.13 Mg ha−1) than in the monoculture (31.79 ± 1.23 Mg ha−1). The AFSs showed a trend towards greater aggregate stability (range throughout the soil profile 4.70 ± 0.07 to 3.31 ± 0.16 mm) compared to the monoculture (4.71 ± 0.02 to 2.71 ± 0.23 mm). Therefore, oil palm AFSs have a greater potential to store carbon in soil aggregates and, consequently, contribute more to climate change mitigation than oil palm monocultures. As such, our results have important implications for the sustainable cultivation and exploitation of the oil palm in the Amazon and in other regions of the world.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与亚马逊地区的单一种植相比,油棕榈树农林系统在土壤聚集体中储存了更多的碳和氮
众所周知,与单一种植相比,农林系统(AFSs)能在土壤中储存更多的碳和氮。然而,有关油棕种植园(全球重要商品)中农林复合系统和单一种植系统土壤团聚体中碳和氮含量的研究仍然很少。因此,本研究的目的是探讨与单一种植相比,油棕全缘种植是否能在土壤团聚体中储存更多的碳和氮。我们在巴西亚马逊东部托梅-阿库的油棕AFS(10年树龄)和油棕单一种植(9年树龄)的0-10、10-20和20-30厘米层采集了土壤样本。我们测定了土壤团聚体的稳定性、宏观和微观团聚体中的碳和氮含量以及根的生物量。总体而言,油棕种植园中大团聚体的碳储存量高于微团聚体。在 0-10 厘米的土壤层中,AFS 的宏观和微观团聚体碳储量(宏观:12.97 ± 0.35,微观:0.53 ± 0.01)高于单一种植(宏观:11.60 ± 0.19,微观:0.29 ± 0.01)。在 0-30 厘米土层中,全缘种植区的土壤总碳储量(38.08 ± 0.13 兆克/公顷-1)高于单一种植区(31.79 ± 1.23 兆克/公顷-1)。与单一种植(4.71 ± 0.02 至 2.71 ± 0.23 毫米)相比,全缘种植呈现出更高的聚合稳定性趋势(整个土壤剖面的范围为 4.70 ± 0.07 至 3.31 ± 0.16 毫米)。因此,与油棕单一种植相比,油棕AFS在土壤聚集体中储存碳的潜力更大,因此对减缓气候变化的贡献也更大。因此,我们的研究结果对亚马逊和世界其他地区油棕的可持续种植和开发具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth''s biosphere is being transformed by various anthropogenic activities. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change addresses a wide range of environment, economic and energy topics and timely issues including global climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, acid deposition, eutrophication of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, species extinction and loss of biological diversity, deforestation and forest degradation, desertification, soil resource degradation, land-use change, sea level rise, destruction of coastal zones, depletion of fresh water and marine fisheries, loss of wetlands and riparian zones and hazardous waste management. Response options to mitigate these threats or to adapt to changing environs are needed to ensure a sustainable biosphere for all forms of life. To that end, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change provides a forum to encourage the conceptualization, critical examination and debate regarding response options. The aim of this journal is to provide a forum to review, analyze and stimulate the development, testing and implementation of mitigation and adaptation strategies at regional, national and global scales. One of the primary goals of this journal is to contribute to real-time policy analysis and development as national and international policies and agreements are discussed and promulgated.
期刊最新文献
Trends in climate adaptation solutions for mountain regions Social networks can mitigate climate change-related food insecurity risks in dryland farming systems in Ghana Biochar-enhanced soilless farming: a sustainable solution for modern agriculture Exploiting time zone differences to harmonize electricity supplies: case study of the Central Asian Region Russia on the pathways to carbon neutrality: forks on roadmaps
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1