Addressing the implementation challenge of risk prediction model due to missing risk factors: The submodel approximation approach

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1002/sim.10184
Tianyi Sun, Allison B. McCoy, Alan B. Storrow, Dandan Liu
{"title":"Addressing the implementation challenge of risk prediction model due to missing risk factors: The submodel approximation approach","authors":"Tianyi Sun, Allison B. McCoy, Alan B. Storrow, Dandan Liu","doi":"10.1002/sim.10184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical prediction models have been widely acknowledged as informative tools providing evidence‐based support for clinical decision making. However, prediction models are often underused in clinical practice due to many reasons including missing information upon real‐time risk calculation in electronic health records (EHR) system. Existing literature to address this challenge focuses on statistical comparison of various approaches while overlooking the feasibility of their implementation in EHR. In this article, we propose a novel and feasible submodel approach to address this challenge for prediction models developed using the model approximation (also termed “preconditioning”) method. The proposed submodel coefficients are equivalent to the corresponding original prediction model coefficients plus a correction factor. Comprehensive simulations were conducted to assess the performance of the proposed method and compared with the existing “one‐step‐sweep” approach as well as the imputation approach. In general, the simulation results show the preconditioning‐based submodel approach is robust to various heterogeneity scenarios and is comparable to the imputation‐based approach, while the “one‐step‐sweep” approach is less robust under certain heterogeneity scenarios. The proposed method was applied to facilitate real‐time implementation of a prediction model to identify emergency department patients with acute heart failure who can be safely discharged home.","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Clinical prediction models have been widely acknowledged as informative tools providing evidence‐based support for clinical decision making. However, prediction models are often underused in clinical practice due to many reasons including missing information upon real‐time risk calculation in electronic health records (EHR) system. Existing literature to address this challenge focuses on statistical comparison of various approaches while overlooking the feasibility of their implementation in EHR. In this article, we propose a novel and feasible submodel approach to address this challenge for prediction models developed using the model approximation (also termed “preconditioning”) method. The proposed submodel coefficients are equivalent to the corresponding original prediction model coefficients plus a correction factor. Comprehensive simulations were conducted to assess the performance of the proposed method and compared with the existing “one‐step‐sweep” approach as well as the imputation approach. In general, the simulation results show the preconditioning‐based submodel approach is robust to various heterogeneity scenarios and is comparable to the imputation‐based approach, while the “one‐step‐sweep” approach is less robust under certain heterogeneity scenarios. The proposed method was applied to facilitate real‐time implementation of a prediction model to identify emergency department patients with acute heart failure who can be safely discharged home.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解决因风险因素缺失而导致的风险预测模型实施难题:子模型近似法
临床预测模型被广泛认为是为临床决策提供循证支持的信息工具。然而,由于电子健康记录(EHR)系统中实时风险计算信息缺失等多种原因,预测模型在临床实践中往往未得到充分利用。应对这一挑战的现有文献主要集中在各种方法的统计比较上,而忽略了在电子病历中实施这些方法的可行性。在本文中,我们提出了一种新颖可行的子模型方法,以应对使用模型近似(也称为 "预处理")方法开发的预测模型所面临的这一挑战。所提出的子模型系数等同于相应的原始预测模型系数加上一个校正系数。为评估所提方法的性能,我们进行了全面的模拟,并与现有的 "一步到位 "方法和估算方法进行了比较。总体而言,模拟结果表明,基于预处理的子模型方法对各种异质性情况具有鲁棒性,与基于估算的方法不相上下,而 "一步扫频 "方法在某些异质性情况下鲁棒性较差。所提出的方法被用于促进预测模型的实时实施,以确定急诊科急性心力衰竭患者可以安全出院回家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
期刊最新文献
Estimating Time-Varying Exposure Effects Through Continuous-Time Modelling in Mendelian Randomization. Regression Approaches to Assess Effect of Treatments That Arrest Progression of Symptoms. Latent Archetypes of the Spatial Patterns of Cancer. Pairwise Accelerated Failure Time Regression Models for Infectious Disease Transmission in Close-Contact Groups With External Sources of Infection. Weighted Expectile Regression Neural Networks for Right Censored Data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1