Effects of behavioral interventions on stress reactivity in adults with substance use disorders.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1037/adb0001032
R Kathryn McHugh,Megan D McCarthy,Juliette A Bichon,Minh Dung Nguyen,Elizabeth K Kneeland,Robyn A Ellis,Daniel G Dillon,Garrett M Fitzmaurice
{"title":"Effects of behavioral interventions on stress reactivity in adults with substance use disorders.","authors":"R Kathryn McHugh,Megan D McCarthy,Juliette A Bichon,Minh Dung Nguyen,Elizabeth K Kneeland,Robyn A Ellis,Daniel G Dillon,Garrett M Fitzmaurice","doi":"10.1037/adb0001032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nHeightened reactivity to stress is associated with poor treatment outcome in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Behavioral strategies can reduce stress reactivity; however, these strategies are understudied in people with SUDs. The objective of this study was to test the effect of two behavioral strategies (cognitive reappraisal and affect labeling) on stress reactivity in people with SUDs.\r\n\r\nMETHOD\r\nTreatment-seeking adults with SUDs (N = 119) were randomized to receive brief training in cognitive reappraisal, affect labeling, or a psychoeducational control, followed by a standardized stress induction. Markers of stress reactivity were collected before and following stress induction and included self-reported negative affect and substance craving, as well as salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalyses of covariance did not indicate a significant effect of treatment condition on negative affect, cortisol, or skin conductance response. Participants in the affect labeling condition had greater increase in craving than those in the cognitive reappraisal condition; neither condition differed from control.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nResults indicated that, although participants were able to implement behavioral skills following a brief training, training condition did not modify stress reactivity, on average, relative to control. Future directions include consideration of individual differences in response to training and determination of whether higher \"dosing\" of skills via multiple sessions or extended practice is needed to influence stress reactivity in people with SUDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":48325,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Addictive Behaviors","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0001032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Heightened reactivity to stress is associated with poor treatment outcome in people with substance use disorders (SUDs). Behavioral strategies can reduce stress reactivity; however, these strategies are understudied in people with SUDs. The objective of this study was to test the effect of two behavioral strategies (cognitive reappraisal and affect labeling) on stress reactivity in people with SUDs. METHOD Treatment-seeking adults with SUDs (N = 119) were randomized to receive brief training in cognitive reappraisal, affect labeling, or a psychoeducational control, followed by a standardized stress induction. Markers of stress reactivity were collected before and following stress induction and included self-reported negative affect and substance craving, as well as salivary cortisol, and skin conductance response. RESULTS Analyses of covariance did not indicate a significant effect of treatment condition on negative affect, cortisol, or skin conductance response. Participants in the affect labeling condition had greater increase in craving than those in the cognitive reappraisal condition; neither condition differed from control. CONCLUSIONS Results indicated that, although participants were able to implement behavioral skills following a brief training, training condition did not modify stress reactivity, on average, relative to control. Future directions include consideration of individual differences in response to training and determination of whether higher "dosing" of skills via multiple sessions or extended practice is needed to influence stress reactivity in people with SUDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为干预对药物使用障碍成人压力反应的影响。
目的压力反应性增高与药物使用障碍(SUDs)患者治疗效果不佳有关。行为策略可以降低压力反应性;然而,这些策略在药物滥用障碍患者中的应用还不充分。本研究的目的是测试两种行为策略(认知重评和情感标签)对药物滥用失调症患者压力反应性的影响。方法将寻求治疗的成年药物滥用失调症患者(119 人)随机分组,接受认知重评、情感标签或心理教育对照组的简短培训,然后进行标准化压力诱导。结果协方差分析表明,治疗条件对负性情绪、皮质醇或皮肤传导反应没有显著影响。结果表明,虽然参与者在短暂的训练后能够实施行为技能,但与对照组相比,训练条件并没有平均改变压力反应性。未来的研究方向包括考虑个体对训练的反应差异,以及确定是否需要通过多次训练或长时间练习来增加技能的 "剂量",以影响 SUD 患者的压力反应性。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Psychology of Addictive Behaviors publishes peer-reviewed original articles related to the psychological aspects of addictive behaviors. The journal includes articles on the following topics: - alcohol and alcoholism - drug use and abuse - eating disorders - smoking and nicotine addiction, and other excessive behaviors (e.g., gambling) Full-length research reports, literature reviews, brief reports, and comments are published.
期刊最新文献
Effects of behavioral interventions on stress reactivity in adults with substance use disorders. The lived experience of gambling-related harm in natural language. Social decision making in binge drinking: An exploration through moral dilemmas. Effect of menstrual cycle on rewarding properties of alcohol cues in women. Longitudinal measurement invariance of constructs derived from the addiction cycle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1