{"title":"Disentangling bottom-up and top-down controls on fish consumption of key prey in the Northeast US Shelf ecosystem","authors":"James Gartland, Robert J Latour","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsae115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Exploited forage fishes serve a dual role in marine ecosystems by supporting directed fisheries and predator productivity, and thus both harvest and predatory removals should be accounted for when developing stock assessments and evaluating management trade-offs. Predator catch and stomach content data collected on the Northeast US Shelf from 1978 to 2019 by two fisheries-independent surveys were combined within multivariate spatiotemporal models to estimate time-series of consumptive removals during spring and fall for four commercially exploited prey; Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis), butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus), and longfin squid (Doryteuthis pealeii). Seasonal consumption trends were mostly synchronous for Atlantic herring and silver hake, asynchronous for butterfish and longfin squid, and predatory removals were generally greater during fall. Consumption has increased since the 1990s for all prey except Atlantic herring and butterfish during fall, which coincides with the widespread implementation of harvest constraints meant to rebuild predator and prey populations. These time-series were linked to hypothesized drivers using state-space regression models; prey availability (bottom-up; positive relationships) and commercial catch (top-down; primarily negative relationships) were the strongest predictors of consumption. Although the mechanisms underlying these relationships remain unresolved, these linkages highlight connections among the systemic drivers of productivity on the Northeast Shelf.","PeriodicalId":51072,"journal":{"name":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICES Journal of Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Exploited forage fishes serve a dual role in marine ecosystems by supporting directed fisheries and predator productivity, and thus both harvest and predatory removals should be accounted for when developing stock assessments and evaluating management trade-offs. Predator catch and stomach content data collected on the Northeast US Shelf from 1978 to 2019 by two fisheries-independent surveys were combined within multivariate spatiotemporal models to estimate time-series of consumptive removals during spring and fall for four commercially exploited prey; Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus), silver hake (Merluccius bilinearis), butterfish (Peprilus triacanthus), and longfin squid (Doryteuthis pealeii). Seasonal consumption trends were mostly synchronous for Atlantic herring and silver hake, asynchronous for butterfish and longfin squid, and predatory removals were generally greater during fall. Consumption has increased since the 1990s for all prey except Atlantic herring and butterfish during fall, which coincides with the widespread implementation of harvest constraints meant to rebuild predator and prey populations. These time-series were linked to hypothesized drivers using state-space regression models; prey availability (bottom-up; positive relationships) and commercial catch (top-down; primarily negative relationships) were the strongest predictors of consumption. Although the mechanisms underlying these relationships remain unresolved, these linkages highlight connections among the systemic drivers of productivity on the Northeast Shelf.
期刊介绍:
The ICES Journal of Marine Science publishes original articles, opinion essays (“Food for Thought”), visions for the future (“Quo Vadimus”), and critical reviews that contribute to our scientific understanding of marine systems and the impact of human activities on them. The Journal also serves as a foundation for scientific advice across the broad spectrum of management and conservation issues related to the marine environment. Oceanography (e.g. productivity-determining processes), marine habitats, living resources, and related topics constitute the key elements of papers considered for publication. This includes economic, social, and public administration studies to the extent that they are directly related to management of the seas and are of general interest to marine scientists. Integrated studies that bridge gaps between traditional disciplines are particularly welcome.